The New John Gill Exposition of the Entire Bible Nahum 1:1
The burden of Nineveh… Of the city of Nineveh, and the
greatness of it, (See Gill on 1:2);
(See Gill on 3:3); Jonah was sent to this city to threaten it with
ruin for its sins; at that time the king and all his people humbled
themselves and repented, and the threatened destruction was averted;
but they relapsing to their former iniquities, this prophet foretells
what would be their certain fate; very rightly therefore the Targum,
and some other Jewish writings F13, observe, that Jonah prophesied
against this city of old; and that Nahum prophesied after him a
considerable time, perhaps at a hundred years distance. This prophecy
is called a burden; it was taken up by the prophet at the command of
the Lord, and was carried or sent by him to Nineveh; and was a hard,
heavy, grievous, and burdensome prophecy to that city, predicting its
utter ruin and desolation; and which, as Josephus F14 says, came to
pass hundred fifteen years after this prophecy; and which event is
placed by the learned Usher F15 in the year of the world 3378 A.M., and
which was 626 B.C.; and by others F16 in the year of the world 3403
A.M., of the flood 1747, in 601 B.C.; but by Dean Prideaux F17 and Mr.
Whiston F18, in 612 B.C.;
the book of the vision of Nahum the Elkoshite; no other prophecy is
called, a book but this, as Abarbinel observes; and gives this reason
for it, because the other prophets immediately declared their
prophecies, as Jonah; but Nahum never went to the Ninevites, but wrote
his prophecy in a book, and sent it to them. It is called "the book of
the vision"; what it contains being made known to him by the Lord in a
vision, as was common; hence the prophets are called seers; and the
prophet is described by the place of his birth, an Elkoshite; though
some think he is so called from his father, whose name was Helkesi, and
said to be a prophet too, as Jerom relates; and with this agrees the
Targum, which calls him Nahum of the house or family of Koshi; but
Jarchi says that Elkosh was the name of his city; Aben Ezra and Kimchi
are in doubt which to refer it to, whether to his city, or to his
ancestors; but there seems no reason to doubt but that he is so called
from his native place; since Jerom F19 says, that there was a village in
Galilee called Helkesi in his days, and which he had seen; though scarce
any traces of the old buildings could be discerned, it was so fallen to
ruin, yet known, to the Jews; and was shown him by one that went about
with him; and which is, by Hesychius F20 the presbyter, placed in the
tribe of Simeon. This is another instance, besides that of Jonah,
disproving the assertion of the Jews, that no prophet rose out of Galilee,
(John 7:52) .
FOOTNOTES:
F13 Tzemach David, fol. 15. 1.
F14 Antiqu. l. 9. c. 11. sect. 3.
F15 Annales Vet. Test. A. M. 3378.
F16 Universal History, vol. 4. p. 331.
F17 Connexion… par. 1. B. 1. p. 47, 48.
F18 Chronological Table, cent. 9.
F19 Proem. in Nahum.
F20 Apud Reland. Palestina Illustrata, tom. 2. p. 748.
| Copyright Statement
The New John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible Modernised and adapted for the computer by Larry Pierce of Online Bible. All Rightes Reserved, Larry Pierce, Winterbourne, Ontario. A printed copy of this work can be ordered from: The Baptist Standard Bearer, 1 Iron Oaks Dr, Paris, AR, 72855
Bibliography Information
Gill, John. "Commentary on Nahum 1:1". "The New John Gill Exposition of the Entire Bible". <http://www.studylight.org/com/geb/view.cgi?book=na&chapter=001&verse=001>. 1999.
|
|