PHILIPPIANS CHAPTER II.
ANALYSIS OF THE CHAPTER.
THIS chapter is made up principally of exhortations to the performance
of various Christian duties, and the exhibition of Christian virtues.
The apostle first exhorts the Philippians, in the most tender manner, so
to live as to give him joy, by evincing among themselves unity and
concord. He entreats them to do nothing by strife and a desire of
distinction, but to evince that humility which is manifested when we
regard others as more worthy than we are, Philippians 2:1-4. This
exhortation he enforces in a most impressive manner by a reference to
the example of Christian example of condescension and humiliation fitted
to repress in us all the aspirings of ambition and to make us ready to
submit to the most humble offices to benefit others, Philippians 2:5-11. He
then exhorts them to work out their salvation with diligence, assuring
them, for their encouragement, that God worketh in them to will and to
do of his good pleasure, Philippians 2:12,13. To this he adds an
exhortation, that they would avoid everything like murmuring and
disputing that they would be blameless and harmless in their walk,
showing the excellency of the religion which they loved to all around
them, and exerting such an influence on others that Paul might feel that
he had not laboured in vain, Philippians 2:14-16. To excite them to this,
he assures them that he was ready himself to be sacrificed for their
welfare, and should rejoice if, by his laying down his life, their
happiness would be promoted. He asked the same thing in return from
them, Philippians 2:17,18. He then tells them, in expressing his interest
in them, that he hoped soon to be able to send Timothy to them again a
man who felt a deep interest in their welfare, and whose going to them
would be one of the highest proofs of the apostle's love,
Philippians 2:19-24. The same love for them, he says, he had now shown to
them by sending to them Epaphroditus--a man to whom he was tenderly
attached, and who had an earnest desire again to return to the church
from which he had been sent. Paul sent him, therefore, again to
Philippi, that he might be with them and comfort them, and he asked for
him a kind reception and affectionate treatment, in view of the
sufferings which he had experienced in the cause of the Redeemer,
Philippians 2:25-30.
Verse 1. If there be therefore any consolation in Christ. This, with
what is said in the remainder of the verse, is designed as a motive
for what he exhorts them to in Philippians 2:2--that they would be of the
same mind, and would thus fulfil his joy. To urge them to this,
he appeals to the tender considerations which religion furnished--
and begins by a reference to the consolation which there was in
Christ. The meaning here may be this: "I am now persecuted and
afflicted. In my trials it will give me the highest joy to learn
that you act as become Christians. You also are persecuted and
afflicted, Philippians 1:28-30; and, in these circumstances, I entreat
that the highest consolation may be sought; and by all that is tender
and sacred in the Christian religion, I conjure you so to live as not
to dishonour the gospel. So live as to bring down the highest
consolation which can be obtained--the consolation which Christ
alone can impart." We are not to suppose that Paul doubted whether
there was any consolation in Christ, but the form of expression here
is one that is designed to urge upon them the duty of seeking the
highest possible. The consolation in Christ is that which
Christ furnishes or imparts. Paul regarded him as the source of
all comfort, and earnestly prays that they might so live that he and
they might avail themselves in the fullest sense of that unspeakable
enjoyment. The idea is, that Christians ought at all times, and
especially in affliction, so to act as to secure the highest possible
happiness which their Saviour can impart to them. Such an object is
worth their highest effort; and if God sees it needful, in order to
that, that they should endure much affliction, still it is gain.
Religious consolation is always worth all which it costs to secure
it.
If any comfort of love. If there be any comfort in the exercise of
tender affection. That there is, no one can doubt. Our happiness is
almost all centred in love. It is when we love a parent, a wife, a
child, a sister, a neighbour, that we have the highest earthly
enjoyment. It is in the love of God, of Christ, of Christians, of the
souls of men, that the redeemed find their highest happiness. Hatred is
a passion full of misery; love an emotion full of joy. By this
consideration, Paul appeals to them, and the motive here is drawn from
all the joy which mutual love and sympathy are fitted to produce in the
soul. Paul would have that love exercised in the highest degree, and
would have them enjoy all the happiness which its mutual exercise could
furnish.
If any fellowship of the Spirit. The word "fellowship"
\~koinwnia\~--means that which is common to two or more; that of
which they partake together. See Barnes "Ephesians 3:9";
See Barnes "Philippians 1:5". The idea here is, that among Christians there
was a participation in the influences of the Holy Ghost; that they
shared, in some degree, the feelings, views, and joys of the sacred
Spirit himself; and that this was a privilege of the highest order. By
this fact, Paul now exhorts them to unity, love, and zeal--so to live
that they might partake, in the highest degree, of the consolations
of the Spirit.
If any bowels and mercies. If there is any affectionate bond by
which you are united to me, and any regard for my sorrows, and any
desire to fill up my joys, so live as to impart to me, your spiritual
father and friend, the consolation which I seek.
{a} "any bowels" Colossians 3:12
{*} "bowels" "tender regards"
Verse 2. Fulfil ye my joy. Fill up my joy so that nothing shall be
wanting to complete it. This, he says, would be done by their union,
zeal, and humility. Comp. John 3:29.
That ye be likeminded. Gr., That ye think the same thing.
See Barnes "2 Corinthians 13:11". Perfect unity of sentiment, opinion, and
plan would be desirable, if it could be attained. It may be, so far as
to prevent discord, schism, contention, and strife in the church, and so
that Christians may be harmonious in promoting the same great work--the
salvation of souls.
Having the same love. Love to the same objects, and the same love
one for another. Though their opinions might differ on some points, yet
they might be united in love. See Barnes "1 Corinthians 1:10".
Being of one accord, \~sumqucoi\~-- of one soul; having your souls
joined together. The word used here does not occur elsewhere in the
New Testament. It means a union of soul; or an acting together as if but
one soul actuated them.
Of one mind. Gr., Thinking the same thing. The apostle here uses
a great variety of expressions to denote the same thing. The object
which he aimed at was union of heart, of feeling, of plan, of purpose.
He wished them to avoid all divisions and strifes; and to show the
power of religion by being united in the common cause. Probably
there is no single thing so much insisted on in the New Testament
as the importance of harmony among Christians. Now, there is
almost nothing so little known; but if it prevailed, the world
would soon be converted to God. See Barnes "John 17:21" or
John 17:21.
{+} "fulfil" "Fill up"
{b} "ye my joy" John 3:29
{c} "be like minded" 2 Corinthians 13:11; 1 Peter 3:8
Verse 3. Let nothing be done through strife. With a spirit of
contention. This command forbids us to do anything, or attempt anything,
as the mere result of strife. This is not the principle from
which we are to act, or by which we are to be governed. We are
to form no plan, and aim at no object, which is to be secured in this
way. The command prohibits all attempts to secure anything over
others by mere physical strength, or by superiority of intellect or
numbers, or as the result of dark schemes and plans formed by
rivalry, or by the indulgence of angry passions, or with the spirit
of ambition. We are not to attempt to do anything merely by
outstripping others, or by showing that we have more talent, courage,
or zeal. What we do is to be by principle, and with a desire to
maintain the truth, and to glorify God. And yet how often is this
rule violated! How often do Christian denominations attempt to
outstrip each other, and to see which shall be the greatest! How
often do ministers preach with no better aim! How often do we
attempt to outdo others in dress, and in the splendour of furniture
and equipage! How often, even in plans of benevolence, and in
the cause of virtue and religion, is the secret aim to outdo others.
This is all wrong. There is no holiness in such efforts. Never
once did the Redeemer act from such a motive, and never once
should this motive be allowed to influence us. The conduct of
others may be allowed to show us what we can do, and ought to
do; but it should not be our sole aim to outstrip them. Comp.
2 Corinthians 9:2-4.
Or vainglory. The word here used --\~kenodozia\~
kenodoxia, occurs nowhere else in the New Testament, though the
adjective--\~kenodoxov\~ kenedoxos, occurs once in Galatians 5:26.
See Barnes "Galatians 5:26". It means, properly, empty pride, or glory,
and is descriptive of vain and hollow parade and show. Suidas
renders it, "any vain opinion about one's self"--\~mataia tiv peri\~
\~eautou oihsiv\~. The idea seems to be that of mere self-esteem; a mere
desire to honour ourselves, to attract attention, to win praise, to make
ourselves uppermost, or foremost, or the main object. The command here
solemnly forbids our doing anything with such an aim--no matter whether
it be in intellectual attainments, in physical strength, in skill in music,
in eloquence or song, in dress, furniture, or religion. Self is not to
be foremost; selfishness is not to be the motive. Probably there is no
command of the Bible which would have a wider sweep than this, or would
touch on more points of human conduct, if fairly applied. Who is there
who passes a single day without, in some respect, desiring to display
himself? What minister of the gospel preaches, who never has
any wish to exhibit his talents, eloquence, or learning? How few
make a gesture, but with some wish to display the grace or power
witch which it is done! Who, in conversation, is always free from
a desire to show his wit, or his power in argumentation, or his skill
in repartee? Who plays at the piano without the desire of commendation?
Who thunders in the senate, or goes to the field of battle; who builds a
house, or purchases an article of apparel; who writes a book, or
performs a deed of benevolence, altogether uninfluenced by this desire?
If all could be taken out of human conduct which is performed merely
from "strife," or from "vain-glory," how small a portion would be left!
But in lowliness of mind. Modesty, or humility. The word here used
is the same which is rendered humility in Acts 20:19; Colossians 2:18,23;
1 Peter 5:5; humbleness in Colossians 3:12; and lowliness in
Ephesians 4:2;; Philippians 2:3. It does not elsewhere occur in the New Testament.
It here means humility, and it stands opposed to that pride or
self-valuation which would lead us to strive for the ascendancy, or
which acts from a wish for flattery or praise. The best and the only
true correction of these faults is humility. This virtue consists in
estimating ourselves according to truth. It is a willingness to take
the place which we ought to take in the sight of God and man; and,
having the low estimate of our own importance and character which
the truth about our insignificance as creatures and vileness as
sinners would produce, it will lead us to a willingness to perform
lowly and humble offices that we may benefit others.
Let each esteem other better than themselves. Comp. 1 Peter 5:5.
This is one of the effects produced by true humility, and it naturally
exists in every truly modest mind. The reasons are these:
(1.) We are sensible of our own defects, but we have not the same clear
view of the defects of others. We see our own hearts; we are conscious
of the great corruption there; we have painful evidence of the
impurity of the motives which often actuate us-- the evil thoughts
and corrupt desires in our own souls; but we have not the same
view of the errors, defects, and follies of others. We can see only
their outward conduct; but, in our own case, we can look within.
It is natural for those who have any just sense of the depravity of
their own souls, charitably to hope that it is not so with others,
and to believe that they have purer hearts. This will lead us to
feel that they are worthy of more respect than we are. Hence this
is always the characteristic of modesty and humility--graces which
the gospel is fitted eminently to produce. A truly pious man will
be always, therefore, an humble man, and will wish that others
should be preferred in office and honour to himself. Of course,
this will not make him blind to the defects of others when they are
manifested; but he will be himself retiring, modest, unambitious,
unobtrusive. This rule of Christianity would strike a blow at all
the ambition of the world. It would rebuke the love of office, and
would produce universal contentment in any low condition of life
where the providence of God may have cast our lot.
See Barnes "1 Corinthians 7:21".
{d} "nothing be done" Galatians 5:26; James 3:14
{a} "each esteem" 1 Peter 5:5
Verse 4. Look not every man on his own things. That is, be not
selfish. Do not let your care and attention be wholly absorbed by your
own concerns, or by the concerns of your own family. Evince a tender
interest for the happiness of the whole, and let the welfare of others
lie near your hearts. This, of course, does not mean that there is
to be any improper interference in the business of others, or that
we are to have the character of "busy-bodies in other men's matters,"
See Barnes "2 Thessalonians 3:11"; See Barnes "1 Timothy 5:13";
See Barnes "1 Peter 4:15"; but that we are to regard, with appropriate
solicitude, the welfare of others, and to strive to do them good.
But every man also on the things of others. It is the duty of every
man to do this. No one is at liberty to live for himself, or to
disregard the wants of others. The object of this rule is to break up
the narrow spirit of selfishness, and to produce a benevolent regard for
the happiness of others. In respect to the rule we may observe: (1.) We
are not to be "busy-bodies" in the concerns of others. See the
references above. We are not to attempt to pry into their secret
purposes. Every man has his own plans, and thoughts, and intentions,
which no other one has a right to look into. Nothing is more odious than
an intermeddler in the concerns of others.
(2.) We are not to obtrude our advice where it is not sought, or at
unseasonable times and places, even if the advice is in itself good. No
man likes to be interrupted to hear advice; and I have no right to
require that he should suspend his business in order that I may give him
counsel.
(3.) We are not to find fault with what pertains exclusively to
him. We are to remember that there are some things which are
his business, not ours; and we are to learn to "possess our
souls in patience," if he does not give just as much as we think he
ought to benevolent objects, or if he dresses in a manner not to please
our taste, or if he indulges in things which do not accord exactly with
our views. He may see reasons for his conduct which we do not;
and it is possible that he may be right, and that, if we understood
the whole case, we should think and act as he does. We often
complain of a man because he does not give as much as we think
he ought to objects of charity; and it is possible that he may be
miserably niggardly and narrow. But it is also possible that he
may be more embarrassed than we know of; or that he may just
then have demands against him of which we are ignorant; or that
he may have numerous poor relatives dependant on him; or that
he gives much with "the left hand" which is not known by "the
right hand." At any rate, it is his business, not ours; and we are
not qualified to judge until we understand the whole case.
(4.) We are not to be gossips about the concerns of others. We are
not to hunt up small stories and petty scandals respecting their
families; we are not to pry into domestic affairs, and divulge them
abroad, and find pleasure in circulating such things from house to
house. There are domestic secrets which are not to be betrayed;
and there is scarcely an offence of a meaner or more injurious
character than to divulge to the public what we have seen in a family
whose hospitality we have enjoyed.
(5.) Where Christian duty and kindness require us to look into the
concerns of others, there should be the utmost delicacy. Even children
have their own secrets, and their own plans and amusements, on a small
scale, quite as important to them as the greater games which we are
playing in life; and they will feel the meddlesomeness of a busy-body
to be as odious to them as we should in our plans. A delicate parent,
therefore, who has undoubtedly a right to know all about his
children, will not rudely intrude into their privacies, or meddle with
their concerns. So, when we visit the sick, while we show a tender
sympathy for them, we should not be too particular in inquiring into
their maladies or their feelings. So, when those with whom we sympathize
have brought their calamities on themselves by their own fault, we
should not ask too many questions about it. We should not too closely
examine one who is made poor by intemperance, or who is in prison for
crime. And so, when we go to sympathize with those who have been, by a
reverse of circumstances, reduced from affluence to penury, we should
not ask too many questions. We should let them tell their own story.
If they voluntarily make us their confidants, and tell us all about
their circumstances, it is well; but let us not drag out the
circumstances, or wound their feelings by our impertinent inquiries, or
our indiscreet sympathy in their affairs. There are always secrets
which the sons and daughters of misfortune would wish to keep to
themselves. But, while these things are true, it is also true that
the rule before us positively requires us to show an interest in the
concerns of others; and it may be regarded as implying the following
things:
(1.) We are to feel that the spiritual interests of every one in the
church is, in a certain sense, our own interest. The church is one. It
is confederated together for a common object. Each one is intrusted with
a portion of the honour of the whole, and the conduct of one member
affects the character of all. We are therefore to promote, in every way
possible, the welfare of every other member of the church. If they go
astray, we are to admonish and entreat them; if they are in error, we
are to instruct them; if they are in trouble, we are to aid them. Every
member of the church has a claim on the sympathy of his brethren, and
should be certain of always finding it when his circumstances are such
as to demand it.
(2.) There are circumstances where it is proper to look with special
interest on the temporal concerns of others. It is when the poor, the
fatherless, and the afflicted must be sought out in order to be aided
and relieved. They are too retiring and modest to press their situation
on the attention of others, and they need that others should manifest a
generous care in their welfare in order to relieve them. This is not
improper interference in their concerns, nor will it be so regarded.
(3.) For a similar reason, we should seek the welfare of all others in a
spiritual sense. We should seek to arouse the sinner, and lead him to
the Saviour. He is blind, and will not come himself; unconcerned, and
will not seek salvation; filled with the love of this world, and will
not seek a better; devoted to pursuits that will lead him to ruin, and
he ought to be apprized of it. It is no more an improper interference in
his concerns to apprize him of his condition, and to attempt to lead him
to the Saviour, than it is to warn a man in a dark night, who walks
on the verge of a precipice, of his peril; or to arouse one from sleep
whose house is in flames. In like manner, it is no more intermeddling
with the concerns of another to tell him that there is a glorious heaven
which may be his, than it is to apprize a man that there is a mine of
golden ore on his farm. It is for the man's own interest, and it is the
office of a friend to remind him of these things. Hie does a man a
favour who tells him that he has a Redeemer, and that there is a heaven
to which he may rise; he does his neighbour the greatest possible
kindness who apprizes him that there is a world of infinite woe, and
tells him of an easy way by which he may escape it. The world around is
dependant on the church of Christ to be apprized of these truths. The
gay will not warn the gay of their danger; the crowd that presses to the
theatre or the ball-room will not apprize those who are there that they
are in the broad way to hell; and every one who loves his neighbour
should feel sufficient interest in him to tell him that he may be
eternally happy in heaven.
{b} "his own things" 1 Corinthians 13:5
Verse 5. Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus.
The object of this reference to the example of the Saviour is
particularly to enforce the duty of humility. This was the highest
example which could be furnished, and it would illustrate and confirm
all the apostle had said of this virtue. The principle in the case
is that we are to make the Lord Jesus our model, and are in all
respects to frame our lives, as far as possible, in accordance with this
great example. The point here is, that he left a state of inexpressible
glory, and took upon him the most humble form of humanity, and performed
the most lowly offices, that he might benefit us.
{a} "mind" John 13:14; 1 Peter 2:21
Verse 6. Who being in the form of God. There is scarcely any passage
in the New Testament which has given rise to more discussion
than this. The importance of the passage on the question of the
Divinity of the Saviour will be perceived at once; and no small
part of the point of the appeal by the apostle depends, as will be
seen, in the fact that Paul regarded the Redeemer as equal with
God. If he was truly Divine, then his consenting to become a man
was the most remarkable of all possible acts of humiliation. The
word rendered form \~morfh\~ morphe, occurs only in three places
in the New Testament, and in each place is rendered form,
Mark 16:12; Philippians 2:6,7. In Mark it is applied to the form which
Jesus assumed after his resurrection, and in which he appeared to
two of his disciples on his way to Emmaus. "After that he appeared in
another form unto two of them." This "form" was so unlike his usual
appearance, that they did not know him. The word properly means,
form, shape, bodily shape, especially a beautiful form, beautiful
bodily appearance. Passow. In Philippians 2:7, it is applied to the
appearance of a servant-- "and took upon him the form of a servant;"
that is, he was in the condition of a servant-- or of the lowest
condition. The word form is often applied to the gods by the classic
writers, denoting their aspect or appearance when they became visible to
men. See Cic. de Nat. Deor. ii. 2; Ovid, Meta. i. 73; Silius xiii. 643;
Xeno. Memora. ix; 2Eniad, iv. 556, and other places cited by Wetstein,
in loc. Hesychius explains it by \~idea, eidov\~. The word occurs often in
the Septuagint,
(1.) as the translation of the word \^HEBREW\^ Ziv splendour,
Daniel 4:33; 5:6,9,10; 7:28;
(2.) as the translation of the word \^HEBREW\^. Tabnith--structure,
model, pattern--as in building, Isaiah 44:13;
(3.) as the translation of \^HEBREW\^ temuna--appearance, form,
shape, image, likeness, Job 4:16. See also the Book of Wisdom
xviii. 1. The word can have here only one of two meanings, either
(1.) splendour, majesty, glory--referring to the honour which the
Redeemer had, his power to work miracles, etc.; or
(2.) nature, or essence--meaning the same as \~fusiv\~, nature, or
\~ousia\~, being. The first is the opinion adopted by Crellus,
Grotius, and others, and substantially by Calvin. Calvin says,
"The form of God here denotes majesty. For as a man is known from the
appearance of his form, so the majesty which shines in God is his
figure. Or, to use a more appropriate similitude, the form of a king
consists of the external marks which indicate a king --as his sceptre,
diadem, coat of mail, attendants, throne, and other insignia of royalty;
the form of a consul is the toga, ivory chair, attending lictors, etc.
Therefore Christ, before the foundation of the world, was in the form of
God, because he had glory with the Father before the world was,
John 17:5. For in the wisdom of God, before he put on our nature,
there was nothing humble or abject, but there was magnificence worthy of
God." --Comm. in loc. The second opinion is, that the word is
equivalent to nature, or being; that is, that he was in the nature
of God, or his mode of existence was that of God, or was Divine. This is
the opinion adopted by Schleusner (Lex.;) Prof. Stuart (Letters to Dr.
Channing, p. 40;) Doddridge, and by orthodox expositors in general,
and seems to me to be the correct interpretation. In support of
this interpretation, and in opposition to that which refers it to his
power of working miracles, or his divine appearance when on earth,
we may adduce the following considerations.
(1.) The "form" here referred to must have been something before he
became a man, or before he took upon him the form of a servant. It was
something from which he humble& himself by making "himself of no
reputation;" by taking upon himself" the form of a servant;" and
by being made "in the likeness of men." Of course, it must have
been something which existed when he had not the likeness of
men; that is, before he became incarnate, he must therefore have
had an existence before he appeared on earth as a man, and in that
previous state of existence there must have been something which
rendered it proper to say that he was "in the form of God."
(2.) That it does not refer to any moral qualities, or to his power of
working miracles on earth, is apparent from the fact that these
were not laid aside. When did he divest himself of these in order
that he might humble himself ? There was something which he
possessed which made it proper to say of him that he was "in the
form of God," which he laid aside when he appeared in the form
of a servant, and in the likeness of men. But assuredly that could
not have been his moral qualities, nor is there any conceivable
sense in which it can be said that he divested himself of the power
of working miracles in order that he might take upon himself the
"form of a servant." All the miracles which he ever wrought
were performed when he sustained the form of a servant, in his
lowly and humble condition. These considerations make it certain
that the apostle refers to a period before the incarnation. It may
be added,
(3.) that the phrase "form of God" is one that naturally
conveys the idea that he was God. When it is said that he was
"in the form of a servant," the idea is, that he was actually in a
humble and depressed condition, and not merely that he appeared
to be. Still it may be asked, what was the "form" which he had
before his incarnation? What is meant by his having been then
"in the form of God?" To these questions perhaps no satisfactory
answer can be given. He himself speaks (John 17:5) of "the
glory which he had with the Father before the world was;" and
the language naturally conveys the idea that there was then a
manifestation of the Divine nature through him, which in some
measure ceased when he became incarnate; that there was some
visible splendour and majesty which was then laid aside. What
manifestation of his glory God may make in the heavenly world of
course we cannot now understand. Nothing forbids us, however,
to suppose that there is some such visible manifestation; some
splendour and magnificence of God in the view of the angelic
beings such as becomes the Great Sovereign of the universe--for
he "dwells in light which no man can approach unto," 1 Timothy 6:16.
That glory, visible manifestation, or splendour, indicating the
nature of God, it is here said that the Lord Jesus possessed before
his incarnation.
Thought it not robbery to be equal with God. This passage, also, has
given occasion to much discussion. Prof. Stuart renders it, "did not
regard his equality with God as an object of solicitous desire;" that is,
that though he was of a Divine nature or condition, he did not eagerly
seek to retain his equality with God, but took on him a humble condition
--even that of a servant. Letters to Channing, pp. 88--92. That this is
the correct rendering of the passage is apparent from the following
considerations :--
(1.) It accords with the scope and design of the apostle's
reasoning. His object is not to show, as our common translation
would seem to imply, that he aspired to be equal with God, or that
he did not regard it as an improper invasion of the prerogatives of
God to be equal with him, but that he did not regard it, in the
circumstances of the case, as an object to be greatly desired, or
eagerly sought to retain his equality with God. Instead of
retaining this by an earnest effort, or by a grasp which he was unwilling
to relinquish, he chose to forego the dignity, and to assume the
humble condition of a man.
(2.) It accords better with the Greek than the common version. The word
rendered robbery \~arpagmov\~-- is found nowhere else in the New Testament,
though the verb from which it is derived frequently occurs,
Matthew 11:12; 13:19; John 6:15; 10:12,28,29; Acts 8:39; 23:10; 2 Corinthians 12:2,4;
1 Thessalonians 4:17; Jude 1:23; Revelation 12:5. The notion of violence, or
seizing, or carrying away, enters into the meaning of the word in
all these places. The word here used does not properly mean
an act of robbery, but the thing robbed--the plunder--
das Rauben, (Passow,) and hence something to be eagerly seized and
appropriated. Schleusner. Comp. Storr, Opuscul. Acade. i. 322, 323.
According to this, the meaning of the word here is, something to be seized
and eagerly sought; and the sense is, that his being equal with God
was not a thing to be anxiously retained. The phrase "thought it
not," means "did not consider;" it was not judged to be a matter
of such importance that it could not be dispensed with. The sense
is, "he did not eagerly seize and tenaciously hold," as one does
who seizes prey or spoil. So Rosenmuller, Schleusner, Bloomfield,
Stuart, and others understand it.
To be equal with God. \~to einai isa yew\~. That is, the being equal
with God he did not consider a thing to be tenaciously retained. The plural
neuter form of the word equal in Greek \~isa\~ used in accordance with a
known rule of the language, thus stated by Buttman. "When an adjective
as predicate is separated from its substantive, it often stands in
the neuter where the substantive is a masculine or feminine, and in the
singular where the substantive is in the plural. That which the
predicate expresses is, in this case, considered in general as a
thing." Gr. Gram., 129, 6. The phrase "equal with God," or
"equal with the gods," is of frequent occurrence in the Greek
classics. See Wetstein, in loc. The very phrase here used occurs
in the Odyssey, O.---
\~ton nun isa yew iyakhsioi eisorowsi\~.
Comp. John 5:18. "Made himself equal with God." The phrase means
one who sustains the same rank, dignity, nature. Now it could not be
said of an angel that he was in any sense equal with God; much less
could this be said of a mere man. The natural and obvious meaning of
the language is, that there was an equality of nature and of rank with
God, from which he humbled himself where he became a man. The meaning
of the whole verse according to the interpretation suggested above, is,
that Christ, before he became a man, was invested with honour, majesty,
and glory, such as was appropriate to God himself; that there was some
manifestation, or splendour in his existence and mode of being then,
which showed that he was equal with God; that he did not consider that
that honour, indicating equality with God, was to be retained at all
events, and so as to do violence, as it were, to other interests, and
to rob the universe of the glory of redemption; and that he was
willing, therefore, to forget that, or lay it by for a time, in order
that he might redeem the world. There were a glory and majesty which
were appropriate to God, and which indicated equality with God--such as
none but God could assume. For how could an angel have such glory, or
such external splendour in heaven, as to make it proper to say that he
was "equal with God?" With what glory could he be invested which
would be such as became God only? The fair interpretation of this
passage therefore is, that Christ, before his incarnation, was equal
with God.
{b} "in the form of God" John 1:1,2; Colossians 1:15
{c} "equal with God" John 5:18
Verse 7. But made himself of no reputation. This translation by no
means conveys the sense of the original. According to this it would
seem that he consented to be without distinction or honour among men;
or that he was willing to be despised or disregarded. The Greek is,
\~eauton ekenwse\~. The word \~kenow\~ means, literally, to empty, to make
empty, to make vain or void. It is rendered made void in
Romans 4:14; made of none effect, 1 Corinthians 1:17; make void,
1 Corinthians 9:15; should be vain, 2 Corinthians 9:3. The word does not occur
elsewhere in the New Testament, except in the passage before us. The
essential idea is that of bringing to emptiness, vanity, or nothingness;
and hence it is applied to a case where one lays aside his rank and
dignity, and becomes, in respect to that, as nothing; that is, he
assumes a more humble rank and station. In regard to its meaning
here we may remark,
(1.) that it cannot mean that he literally divested himself of his
Divine nature and perfections, for that was impossible. He could not
cease to be omnipotent, and omnipresent, and most holy, and true, and
good.
(2.) It is conceivable that he might have laid aside, for a time, the
symbols or the manifestation of his glory, or that the outward
expressions of his majesty in heaven might have been withdrawn. It is
conceivable for a Divine Being to intermit the exercise of his almighty
power, since it cannot be supposed that God is always exerting his
power to the utmost. And, in like manner, there might be for a time a
laying aside or intermitting of these manifestions or symbols, which were
expressive of the Divine glory and perfections. Yet
(3.) this supposes no change in the Divine nature, or in the essential
nature of the Divine perfections. When the sun is obscured by a cloud,
or in an eclipse, there is no real change of its glory, nor are his
beams extinguished, nor is the sun himself in any measure changed.
His lustre is only for a time obscured. So it might have been in regard
to the manifestation of the glory of the Son of God. Of course, there is
much in regard to this which is obscure; but the language of the apostle
undoubtedly implies more than that he took an humble place, or
that he demeaned himself in an humble manner. In regard to the
actual change respecting his manifestations in heaven, or the
withdrawing of the symbols of his glory there, the Scriptures are nearly
silent, and conjecture is useless--perhaps improper. The language
before us fairly implies that he laid aside that which was expressive
of his being Divine--that glory which is involved in the phrase
"being in the form of God"--and took upon himself another form
and manifestation in the condition of a servant.
And took upon him the form of a servant. The phrase "form of a
servant," should be allowed to explain the phrase "form of God" in
Philippians 2:6. The form of a servant is that which indicates the condition
of a servant, in contradistinction from one of higher rank. It means, to
appear as a servant, to perform the offices of a servant, and to be
regarded as such. He was made like a servant in the lowly condition which
he assumed. The whole connexion and force of the argument here demands
this interpretation. Storr and Rosenmuller interpret this as
meaning that he became the servant or minister of God, and that in
doing it, it was necessary that he should become a man. But the
objection to this is obvious. It greatly weakens the force of the
apostle's argument. His object is to state the depth of humiliation
to which he descended; and this was best done by saying that he
descended to the lowest condition of humanity, and appeared in the
most humble garb. The idea of being a "servant or minister of God"
would not express that, for this is a term which might be applied to
the highest angel in heaven. Though the Lord Jesus was not
literally a servant or slave, yet what is here affirmed was true of
him in the following respects:
(1.) he occupied a most lowly condition in life; and
(2.) he condescended to perform such acts as are appropriate only to
those who are servants. "I am among you as he that serveth,"
Luke 22:27. Comp John 13:4-15.
And was made in the likeness of men. Marg., habit. The Greek word
means likeness, resemblance. The meaning is, he was made like unto men
by assuming such a body as theirs. See Barnes "Romans 8:3".
{a} "made himself" Psalms 22:6
{*} "reputation" "account"
{b} "and was made" Luke 22:27
{+} "made" "Being born"
{1} "likeness" "habit"
Verse 8. And being found. That is, being such, or existing as a man,
he humbled himself.
In fashion as a man. The word rendered fashion \~schma\~ means
figure, mien, deportment. Here it is the same as state, or condition.
The sense is, that when he was reduced to this condition he humbled
himself, and obeyed even unto death. He took upon himself all the
attributes of a mall. He assumed all the innocent infirmities of our
nature. He appeared as other men do, was subjected to the necessity of
food and raiment, like others, and was made liable to suffering, as other
men are. It was still He who had been in the "form of God" who thus
appeared; and, though his Divine glory had been for a time laid aside,
yet it was not extinguished or lost. It is important to remember, in all
our meditations on the Saviour, that it was the same Being who had
been invested with so much glory in heaven that appeared on earth in the
form of a man.
He humbled himself. Even then, when he appeared as a man. He had not
only laid aside the symbols of his glory, Philippians 2:7, and beck, he a
man; but, when he was a man, he humbled himself. Humiliation was a
constant characteristic of him as a man. He did not aspire to high
honours; he did not affect pomp and parade; he did not demand the service
of a train of menials; but he condescended to the lowest conditions of
life, Luke 22:27. The words here are very carefully chosen. In the
former case, Philippians 2:7, when he became a man, he "emptied himself,"
or laid aside the symbols of his glory; now, when a man, he
humbled himself. That is, though he was God appearing in the form of
man--a Divine Person on earth--yet he did not assume and assert the
dignity and prerogatives appropriate to a Divine Being, but put himself
in a condition of obedience. For such a Being to obey law implied
voluntary humiliation; and the greatness of his humiliation was shown by
his becoming entirely obedient, even till he died on the cross.
And became obedient. He subjected himself to the law of God, and
wholly obeyed it, Hebrews 10:7,9. It was a characteristic of the
Redeemer that he yielded perfect obedience to the will of God. Should it
be said that, if he was God himself, he must have been himself the
lawgiver, we may reply, that this rendered his obedience the more
wonderful and the more meritorious. If a monarch should, for an
important purpose, place himself in a position to obey his own laws,
nothing could show in a more striking manner their importance in his
view. The highest honour that has been shown to the law of God on earth
was, that it was perfectly observed by him who made the law --the
great Mediator.
Unto death. He obeyed even when obedience terminated in death. The
point of this expression is this:--One may readily and cheerfully obey
another where there is no particular peril. But the case is different
where obedience is attended with danger. The child shows a spirit of
true obedience when he yields to the commands of a father, though it
should expose him to hazard; the servant who obeys his master, when
obedience is attended with risk of life; the soldier when he is morally
certain that to obey will be followed by death. Thus many a company or
platoon has been ordered into the "deadly breach," or directed to storm
a redoubt, or to scale a wall, or to face a cannon, when it was morally
certain that death would be the consequence. No profounder spirit of
obedience can be evinced than this. It should be said, however, that the
obedience of the soldier is in many cases scarcely voluntary, since, if
he did not obey, death would be the penalty. But in the case of the
Redeemer it was wholly voluntary, he placed himself in the condition of
a servant to do the will of God, and then never shrank from what that
condition involved.
Even the death of the cross. It was not such a death as a servant
might incur by crossing a stream, or by falling among robbers, or by
being worn out by toil; it was not such as the soldier meets when he is
suddenly cut down covered with glory as he fails; it was the long,
lingering, painful, humiliating death of the cross. Many a one might
be willing to obey if the death that was suffered was regarded as
glorious; but when it is ignominious, and of the most degrading
character, and the most torturing that human ingenuity can invent,
then the whole character of the obedience is changed. Yet this was the
obedience the Lord Jesus evinced; and it was in this way that his
remarkable readiness to suffer was shown.
{++} "as a man" "And being in condition truly man"
{c} "obedient" Hebrews 12:12
Verse 9. Wherefore. As a reward of this humiliation and these
sufferings. The idea is, that there was an appropriate reward for it,
and that that was bestowed upon him by his exaltation as Mediator to the
right hand of God. See Barnes "Hebrews 2:9".
God also hath highly exalted him. As Mediator. Though he was thus
humbled, and appeared in the form of a servant, he is now raised up to
the throne of glory, and to universal dominion. This exaltation is
spoken of the Redeemer as he was, sustaining a Divine and a human
nature. If there was, as has been supposed, some obscuration or
withdrawing of the symbols of his glory Philippians 2:7 when he became a
man, then this refers to the restoration of that glory, and would seem to
imply, also, that there was additional honour conferred on him. There
was all the augmented glory resulting from the work which he had
performed in redeeming man.
And given him a name which is above every name. No other name
can be compared with his. It stands alone. He only is Redeemer,
Saviour. He only is Christ, the Anointed of God.
See Barnes "Hebrews 1:4". He only is the Son of God. His rank, his
titles, his dignity, are above all others. See this illustrated
See Barnes "Ephesians 1:20", See Barnes "Ephesians 1:21".
{a} "God" Hebrews 2:9; Revelation 3:21
Verse 10. That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow. The knee
should bow, or bend, in token of honour, or worship; that is, all
men should adore him. This cannot mean merely that at the mention of the
name of Jesus we should bow; nor is there any evidence that God
requires this. Why should we bow at the mention of that name, rather
than at any of the other titles of the Redeemer? Is there any
special sacredness or honour in it above the other names which he
bears? And why should we bow at his name rather than at the name of
the Father? Besides, if any special homage is to be paid to the name
of the Saviour under the authority of this passage--and this is the only
one on which the authority of this custom is based--it should be by
bowing the knee, not the "head." But the truth is, this
authorizes and requires neither; and the custom of bowing at the name of
Jesus, in some churches, has arisen entirely from a misinterpretation of
this passage. There is no other place in the Bible to which an appeal is
made to authorize the custom. Comp. Neal's History of the Puritans,
chap. 5. Ninth. 5. The meaning here is, not that a special
act of respect or adoration should be shown wherever the name
"Jesus" occurs in reading the Scriptures, or whenever it is mentioned,
but that he was so exalted that it would be proper that all in heaven
and on earth should worship him, and that the time would come when he
would be thus everywhere acknowledged as Lord. The bowing of the knee
properly expresses homage, respect, adoration, See Barnes "Romans 11:4";
and it cannot be done to the Saviour by those who are in heaven, unless
he be Divine.
Of things in heaven. \~epouraniwn\~ --rather, of beings in heaven, the
word "things" being improperly supplied by our translators. The
word may be in the neuter plural; but it may be also in the
masculine plural, and denote beings rather than things.
Things do not bow the knee; and the reference here is undoubtedly to
angels, and to the "spirits of the just made perfect" in heaven. If
Jesus is worshipped there, he is divine; for there is no idolatry of a
creature in heaven. In this whole passage there is probably an
allusion to Isaiah 45:23. See it illustrated See Barnes "Romans 14:11".
In the great divisions here specified--of those in heaven, on the earth,
and under the earth--the apostle intends, doubtless, to denote the
universe. The same mode of designating the universe occurs in
Revelation 5:13; Exodus 20:4; Psalms 96:11,12. This mode of expression is equivalent
to saying, "all that is above, around, and beneath us," and arises from
what appears to us. The division is natural and obvious- that which
is above us in the heavens, that which is on the earth where we dwell,
and all that is beneath us.
And things in earth. Rather, "beings on earth," to wit, men; for
they only are capable of rendering homage.
And things under the earth. Beings under the earth. The whole
universe shall confess that he is Lord. This embraces, doubtless,
those who have departed from this life, and perhaps includes also
fallen angels. The meaning is, that they shall all acknowledge
him as universal Lord; all bow to his sovereign will; all be subject
to his control; all recognise him as divine. The fallen and the
lost will do this; for they will be constrained to yield an unwilling
homage to him by submitting to the sentence from his lips that
shall consign them to woe; and thus the whole universe shall
acknowledge the exalted dignity of the Son of God. But this does
not mean that they will all be saved, for the guilty and the lost may
be compelled to acknowledge his power, and submit to his decree
as the sovereign of the universe. There is the free and cheerful
homage of the heart which they who worship him in heaven will
render; and there is the constrained homage which they must yield
who are compelled to acknowledge his authority.
{*} "at the name" "In"
Verse 11. And that every tongue should confess. Every one should
acknowledge him. On the duty and importance of confessing Christ,
See Barnes "Romans 10:9", See Barnes "Romans 10:10".
That Jesus Christ is Lord. The word Lord, here, is used in its
primitive and proper sense, as denoting owner, ruler, sovereign.
Comp. See Barnes "Romans 14:9". The meaning is, that all should
acknowledge him as the universal sovereign.
To the glory of God the Father. Such a universal confession would
honour God. See Barnes "John 5:23", where this sentiment is explained.
{c} "to the glory" John 13:13; Romans 14:9
Verse 12. Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed. The
Philippians had from the beginning manifested a remarkable readiness
to show respect to the apostle, and to listen to his teaching. This
readiness he more than once refers to and commends. He still
appeals to them, and urges them to follow his counsels, that they
might secure their salvation.
Now much more in my absence. Though they had been obedient when he
was with them, yet circumstances had occurred in his absence which made
their obedience more remarkable, and more worthy of special commendation.
Work out your own salvation. This important command was first
addressed to Christians, but there is no reason why the same command
should not be regarded as addressed to all--for it is equally
applicable to all. The duty of doing this is enjoined here; the
reason, for making the effort, or the encouragement for the effort,
is stated in the next verse. In regard to the command here, it is
natural to inquire why it is a duty, and what is necessary to be
done in order to comply with it? On the first of these inquiries,
it may be observed that it is a duty to make a personal effort to
secure salvation, or to work out our salvation:
(1.) Because God commands it. There is no command more frequently
repeated in the Scriptures, than the command to make to ourselves a new
heart; to strive to enter in at the strait gate; to break off from sin,
and to repent.
(2.) It is a duty because it is our own personal interest that is at
stake. No other one has, or can have, as much interest in our salvation
as we have. It is every man's duty to be as happy as possible here,
and to be prepared for eternal happiness in the future world. No man has
a right either to throw away his life or his soul. He has no more right
to do the one than the other; and if it is a man's duty to endeavour
to save his life when in danger of drowning, it is no less his duty to
endeavour to save his soul when in danger of hell.
(3.) Our earthly friends cannot save us. No effort of theirs can
deliver us from eternal death without our own exertion. Great as may
be their solicitude for us, and much as they may do, there is a point
where their efforts must stop--and that point is always short of our
salvation, unless we are roused to seek salvation. They may pray, and
weep, and plead, but they cannot save us. There is a work to be done on
our own hearts which they cannot do.
(4.) It is a duty, because the salvation of the soul will not take
care of itself without an effort on our part. There is no more reason
to suppose this than that health and life will take care of themselves
without our own exertion. And yet many live as if they supposed that
somehow all would yet be well; that the matter of salvation need not
give them any concern, for that things will so arrange themselves
that they will be saved. Why should they suppose this any more in
regard to religion than in regard to anything else?
(5.) It is a duty, because there is no reason to expect the Divine
interposition without our own effort. No such interposition is promised
to any man, and why should he expect it? In the case of all who have
been saved, they have made an effort--and why should we expect that God
will favour us more than he did them? "God helps them who help
themselves;" and what reason has any man to suppose that he will
interfere in his case and save him, if he will put forth no effort to
"work out his own salvation?" In regard to the other inquiry --What does
the command imply; or what is necessary to be done in order to comply
with it?--we may observe, that it does not mean
(1.) that we are to attempt to deserve salvation on the ground of
merit. That is out of the question; for what can man do that shall be an
equivalent for eternal happiness in heaven? Nor
(2.) does it mean that we are to endeavour to make atonement for past
sins. That would be equally impossible--and it is, besides, unnecessary.
That work has been done by the great Redeemer. But it means,
(1.) that we are to make an honest effort to be saved in the way
which God has appointed;
(2.) that we are to break off from our sins by true repentance;
(3.) that we are to believe in the Saviour and honestly to put our trust
in him;
(4.) that we are to give up all that we have to God;
(5.) that we are to break away from all evil companions and evil plans
of life; and
(6.) that we are to resist all the allurements of the world, and all the
temptations which may assault us that would lead us back from God, and
are to persevere unto the end. The great difficulty in working out
salvation is in forming a purpose to begin at once. When that purpose
is formed, salvation is easy.
With fear and trembling. That is, with that kind of anxiety which one
has who feels that he has an important interest at stake, and that he is
in danger of losing it. The reason or the ground for "fear" in this case
is in general this: there is danger of losing the soul.
(1.) So many persons make ship wreck of all hope and perish, that there
is danger that we may also.
(2.) There are so many temptations and allurements in the world,
and so many things that lead us to defer attention to religion, that
there is danger that we may be lost.
(3.) There is danger that if the present opportunity passes, another
may not occur. Death may soon overtake us. No one has a moment to lose.
No one can designate one single moment of his life, and say, "I may
safely lose that moment. I may safely spend it in the neglect of my
soul."
(4.) It should be done with the most earnest concern, from the
immensity of the interest at stake. If the soul is lost, all is lost.
And who is there that can estimate the value of that soul which is thus
in danger of being lost for ever?
{a} "work out" Proverbs 10:16; John 6:27-29; Hebrews 4:11; 2 Peter 1:5-10
Verse 13. For it is God that worketh in you. This is given as a
reason for making an effort to be saved, or for working out our salvation.
It is often thought to be the very reverse, and men often feel that
if God works "in us to will and to do," there can be no need of
our making an effort, and that there would be no use in it. If God
does all the work, say they, why should we not patiently sit still,
and wait until he puts forth his power, and accomplishes in us what
he wills? It is of importance, therefore, to understand what this
declaration of the apostle means, in order to see whether this
objection is valid, or whether the fact that God "works in us" is to
be regarded as a reason why we should make no effort. The word
rendered worketh--\~energwn\~--working--is from a verb meaning to
work, to be active, to produce effect--and is that from which we
have derived the word energetic. The meaning is, that God
produces a certain effect in us; he exerts such an influence over us
as to lead to a certain result in our minds--to wit, "to will and to do."
Nothing is said of the mode in which this is done, and probably
this cannot be understood by us here. Comp. John 3:8. In
regard to the Divine agency here referred to, however, certain
things, though of a negative character, are clear. It is not God who
acts for us. He leads us to "will and to do". It is not
said that he wills and does for us, and it cannot be. It is man
that "wills and does"--though God so influences him that he does it.
(2.) He does not compel or force us against our will. He leads us
to "will" as well as to do. The will cannot be forced; and the
meaning here must be that God exerts such an influence as to make
us willing to obey him. Comp. Psalms 110:3.
(3.) It is not a physical force, but it must be a moral influence.
A physical power cannot act on the will. You may chain a man,
incarcerate him in the deepest dungeon, starve him, scourge him, apply
red-hot pincers to his flesh, or place on him the thumb-screw, but
the will is still free. You cannot bend that, or control it, or
make him believe otherwise than as he chooses to believe. The
declaration here, therefore, cannot mean that God compels us,
or that we are anything else but free agents still, though he
"works in us to will and to do." It must mean merely that he
exerts such an influence as to secure this result.
To will and to do of his good pleasure. Not to will and to do
everything, but his "good pleasure." The extent of the Divine agency
here referred to is limited to that, and no man should adduce this
passage to prove that God "works" in him to lead him to commit sin. This
passage teaches no such doctrine. It refers here to Christians,
and means that he works in their hearts that which is agreeable to
him, or leads them to "will and to do" that which is in accordance with
his own will. The word rendered "good pleasure"-- \~eudokia\~-- means
delight, good-will, favour; then good pleasure, purpose, will.
See Ephesians 1:5; 2 Thessalonians 1:11. Here it means that which would be agreeable
to him; and the idea is, that he exerts such an influence as to lead men
to will and to do that which is in accordance with his will. Paul
regarded this fact as a reason why we should work out our salvation
with fear and trembling. It is with that view that he urges it, and not
with any idea that it will embarrass our efforts, or be a hinderance to
us in seeking salvation. The question then is, how this fact can be a
motive to us to make an effort? In regard to this we may observe,
(1.) that the work of our salvation is such that we need help, and
such help as God only can impart. We need it to enable us to overcome our
sins; to give us such a view of them as to produce true penitence; to
break away from our evil companions; to give up our plans of evil,
and to resolve to lead different lives. We need help that our minds
may be enlightened; that we may be led in the way of truth; that
we may be saved from the danger of error, and that we may not
be suffered to fall back into the ways of transgression. Such help
we should welcome from any quarter; and any assistance furnished on these
points will not interfere with our freedom.
(2.) The influence which God exerts on the mind is in the way of
help or aid. What he does will not embarrass or hinder us. It
will prevent no effort which we make to be saved; it will throw no
hinderance or obstacle in the way. When we speak of God's working
"in us to will and to do," men often seem to suppose that his
agency will hinder us, or throw some obstacle in our way, or exert
some evil influence on our minds, or make it more difficult for us
to work out our salvation than it would be without his agency.
But this cannot be. We may be sure that all the influence which
God exerts over our minds will be to aid us in the work of
salvation, not to embarrass us; will be to enable us to overcome our
spiritual enemies and our sins, and not to put additional weapons
into their hands, or to confer on them new power. Why should
men ever dread the influence of God on their hearts, as if he would
hinder their efforts for their own good?
(3.) The fact that God works is an encouragement for us to work. When a
man is about to set out a peach or all apple tree, it is an encouragement
for him to reflect that the agency of God is around him, and that he can
cause the tree to produce blossoms, and leaves, and fruit. When
he is about to plough and sow his farm, it is an encouragement,
not a hinderance, to reflect that God works, and that he can quicken
the grain that is sown, and produce an abundant harvest. What
encouragement of a higher order can man ask? And what farmer
is afraid of the agency of God in the case, or supposes that the fact
that God exerts an agency is a reason why he should not plough
and plant his field, or set out his orchard? Poor encouragement
would a man have in these things if God did not exert any agency
in the world, and could not be expected to make the tree grow, or
to cause the grain to spring up; and equally poor would be all the
encouragement in religion without his aid.
{c} "God which" Hebrews 13:21
Verse 14. Do all things without murmurings and disputings. In a
quiet, peaceful, inoffensive manner. Let there be no brawls, strifes, or
contentions. The object of the apostle here is, probably, to illustrate
the sentiment which he had expressed in Philippians 2:3-5, where he
had inculcated the general duties of humbleness of mind, and of
esteeming others better than themselves. In order that that spirit
might be fully manifested, he now enjoins the duty of doing every
thing in a quiet and gentle manner, and of avoiding any species of
strife. See Barnes "Ephesians 4:31", See Barnes "Ephesians 4:32".
{a} "murmurings" 1 Corinthians 10:10
{b} "disputings" Romans 14:1
Verse 15. That ye may be blameless. That you may give no occasion
for others to accuse you of having done wrong.
And harmless. Marg., sincere. The Greek word (\~akeraiov\~)
means, properly, that which is unmixed; and then pure, sincere.
The idea here is, that they should be artless, simple, without guile.
Then they would injure no one. The word occurs only in Matthew 10:16;
Philippians 2:15, where it is rendered harmless, and Romans 16:19,
where it is rendered simple. See Barnes "Matthew 10:16",
See Barnes "Romans 16:19".
The sons of God. The children of God--a phrase by which true
Christians were denoted. See Barnes "Matthew 5:46";
See Barnes "Ephesians 5:1".
Without rebuke. Without blame; without giving occasion for any one to
complain of you.
In the midst of a crooked and perverse nation. Among those of
perverted sentiments and habits; those who are disposed to complain and
find fault; those who will take every occasion to pervert what you do
and say, and who seek every opportunity to retard the cause of truth
and righteousness. It is not certainly known to whom the apostle refers
here, but it seems not improbable that he had particular reference to
the Jews who were in Philippi. The language here used was employed by
Moses Deuteronomy 32:6 as applicable to the Jewish people, and it is
accurately descriptive of the character of the nation in the time of
Paul. The Jews were among the most bitter foes of the gospel,
and did perhaps more than any other people to embarrass the cause
of truth, and prevent the spread of the true religion.
Among whom ye shine. Marg., "Or, shine ye." The Greek will admit
of either construction, and expositors have differed as to the correct
interpretation. Rosenmuller, Doddridge, and others, regard it as
imperative, and as designed to enforce on them the duty of letting
their light shine. Erasmus says it is doubtful whether it is to be
understood in the indicative or imperative. Grotius, Koppe,
Bloomfield, and others, regard it as in the indicative, and as
teaching that they did, in fact, shine as lights in the world. The
sense can be determined only by the connexion; and, in regard to it,
different readers will form different opinions. It seems to me that the
connexion seems rather to require the sense of duty or obligation to
be understood. The apostle is enforcing on them the duty of being
blameless and harmless; of holding forth the word of life; and it
is in accordance with his design to remind them that they ought
to be lights to those around them.
As lights in the world. The comparison of Christians with light
often occurs in the Scriptures. See Barnes "Matthew 5:14",
See Barnes "Matthew 5:16". The image here is not improbably taken from
lighthouses on a sea-coast. The image then is, that as those
lighthouses are placed on a dangerous coast to apprize vessels of
their peril, and to save them from shipwreck, so the light of
Christian piety shines on a dark world, and in the dangers of the
voyage which we are making. See the Note of Burder, in
Rosenmuller, Alt. u. neu. Morgenland, in loc.
{1} "harmless" "sincere"
{c} "sons of God" Matthew 5:45; Ephesians 5:1
{*} "rebuke" "reproach"
{d} "crooked and perverse" Deuteronomy 32:5
{2} "ye shine" "shine ye"
{e} "lights in the world" Matthew 5:14,16
Verse 16. Holding forth the word of life. That is, you are under
obligation to hold forth the word of life. It is a duty incumbent on
you as Christians to do it. The "word of life" means the gospel,
called the "word of life" because it is the message that promises
life; or perhaps this is a Hebraism, denoting the living, or
life giving word. The gospel stands thus in contrast with all human
systems of religions for they have no efficacy to save--and to the
law which "killeth." See Barnes "John 6:63";
See Barnes "2 Corinthians 3:6". The duty here enjoined is that of making
the gospel known to others, and of thus keeping up the knowledge of it in
the world. This duty rests on Christians, Matthew 5:14,16, and they
cannot escape from the obligation. They axe bound to do this, not
only because God commands it, but
(1.) because they are called into the church that they may be witnesses
for God, Isaiah 43:10.
(2.) Because they are kept on the earth for that purpose. If it
were not for some such design, they would be removed to heaven
at once on their conversion.
(3.) Because there are no others to do it. The gay will not warn the gay,
nor the proud the proud, nor the scoffer the scoffer. The thoughtless and
the vain will not go and tell others that there is a God and a Saviour;
nor will the wicked warn the wicked, and tell them that they are in the
way to hell. There are none who will do this but Christians; and, if
they neglect it, sinners will go unwarned and unalarmed down to
death. This duty rests on every Christian. The exhortation here
is not made to the pastor, or to any officer of the church particularly;
but to the mass of communicants. They are to shine as lights
in the world; they are to hold forth the word of life. There is not
one member of a church who is so obscure as to be exempt from
the obligation; and there is not one who may not do something in
this work. If we are asked how this may be done, we may reply,
(1.) they are to do it by example. Every one is to hold forth the
living word in that way.
(2.) By efforts to send the gospel to those who have it not. There is
almost no one who cannot contribute something, though it may be but
two mites, to accomplish this.
(3.) By conversation. There is no Christian who has not some influence
over the minds and hearts of others; and he is bound to use that
influence in holding forth the word of life.
(4.) By defending the Divine origin of religion when attacked.
(5.) By rebuking sin, and thus testifying to the value of holiness. The
defence of the truth, under God, and the diffusion of a knowledge
of the way of salvation, rests on those who are Christians. Paganism
never originates a system which it would not be an advantage to the world
to have destroyed as soon as it is conceived. Philosophy has never yet
told of a way by which a sinner may be saved. The world at large devises
no plan for the salvation of the soul. The most crude, ill-digested, and
perverse systems of belief conceivable, prevail in the community called
"the world." Every form of opinion has an advocate there; every
monstrous vagary that the human mind ever conceived finds friends and
defenders there. The human mind has of itself no elastic energy to bring
it from the ways of sin; it has no recuperative power to lead it back
to God. The world at large is dependant on the church for any just
views of God, and of the way of salvation; and every Christian is to
do his part in making that salvation known.
That I may rejoice. This was one reason which the apostle urged, and
which it was proper to urge, why they should let their light shine. He
had been the instrument of their conversion, he had founded their
church, he was their spiritual father, and had shown the deepest
interest in their welfare; and he now entreats them, as a means of
promoting his highest joy, to be faithful and holy. The exemplary
piety and holy lives of the members of a church will be one of the
sources of highest joy to a pastor in the day of judgment. Comp.
3 John 1:4.
In the day of Christ. The day when Christ shall appear--the day of
judgment. It is called the day of Christ because he will be the glorious
object which will be prominent on that day; it will be the day in which
he will be honoured as the Judge of all the world.
That I have not run in vain. That is, that I have not lived in
vain--life being compared with a race. See Barnes "1 Corinthians 9:26".
Neither laboured in vain. In preaching the gospel. Their
holy lives would be the fullest proof that he was a faithful preacher.
{f} "neither laboured" 1 Corinthians 9:26
Verse 17. Yea, and if I be offered. Marg., poured forth.
The mention of his labours in their behalf, in the previous verse, seems
to have suggested to him the sufferings which he was likely yet to endure
on their account. He had laboured for their salvation. He had
exposed himself to peril that they and others might have the gospel.
On their account he had suffered much; he had been made a
prisoner at Rome; and there was a possibility, if not a probability,
that his life might be a forfeit for his labours in their behalf. Yet
he says that, even ff this should happen, he would not regret it,
but it would be a source of joy. The word which is here used--
\~spendomai\~ properly means, to pour out, to make a libation; and is
commonly used, in the classic writers, in connexion with sacrifices.
It refers to a drink-offering, where one who was about to offer a
sacrifice, or to present a drink-offering to the gods, before he tasted
of it himself, poured out a part of it on the altar. Passow. It is
used also to denote the fact, that, when an animal was about to be
slain in sacrifice, wine was poured on it as a solemn act of devoting
it to God. Comp. Numbers 15:6; 28:7,14. In like manner,
Paul may have regarded himself as a victim prepared for the sacrifice. In
the New Testament it is found only in this place, and in 2 Timothy 4:6,
where it is rendered, "I am ready to be offered."
See Barnes "2 Timothy 4:6". It does not here mean that Paul really
expected to be a sacrifice, or to make an expiation for sin by his
death; but that he might be called to pour out his blood, or to offer
up his life as if he were a sacrifice, or an offering to God. We
have a similar use of language, when we say that a man
sacrifices himself for his friends or his country.
Upon the sacrifice. \~epi th yusia\~. The word here rendered sacrifice
means,
(1.) the act of sacrificing;
(2.) the victim that is offered; and
(3.) any oblation or offering. Robinson, Lex. Here it must be used in
the latter sense, and is connected with "faith"--" the sacrifice of
your faith." The reference is probably to the faith, that is, the
religion of the Philippians, regarded as a sacrifice or an offering
to God; the worship which they rendered to him. The idea of Paul is, that
if, in order to render that offering what it should hereto make it as
complete and acceptable to God as possible--it were necessary for him to
die, pouring out his blood, and strength, and life, as wine was
poured out to prepare a sacrifice for the altar and make it complete,
he would not refuse to do it, but would rejoice in the opportunity.
He seems to have regarded them as engaged in making an offering
of faith, and as endeavouring to make the offering complete and
acceptable; and says that if his death were necessary to make their
piety of the highest and most acceptable kind, he was ready to die.
And service, \~leitourgia\~ --a word taken from an act of worship,
or public service, and especially the ministry of those engaged in
offering sacrifices, Luke 1:23; Hebrews 7:6. Here it means, the
ministering or service which the Philippians rendered to God; the
worship which they offered, the essential element of which was
faith. Paul was willing to endure anything, even to suffer death
in their cause, if it would tend to make their "service" more pure,
spiritual, and acceptable to God. The meaning of the whole is,
(1.) that the sufferings and dangers which he now experienced
were in their cause, and on their behalf; and
(2.) that he was willing to lay down his life, if their piety would be
promoted, and their worship be rendered more pure and acceptable to God.
I joy. That is, I am not afraid of death; and if my dying can be the
means of promoting your piety, it will be a source of rejoicing. Comp.
See Barnes "Philippians 1:23".
And rejoice with you all. My joy will be increased in anything that
promotes yours. The fruits of my death will reach and benefit you, and it
will be a source of mutual congratulation.
{3} "offered" "poured forth"
{g} "upon the sacrifice" 1 Corinthians 9:26
Verse 18. For the same came. Because we are united, and what affects
one of us should affect both.
Do ye joy and rejoice with me. That is, "Do not grieve at my death.
Be not overwhelmed with sorrow, but let your hearts be filled with
congratulation. It will be a privilege and a pleasure thus to die." This
is a noble sentiment, and one that could have been uttered only by a
heroic and generous mind--by a man who did not dread death, and who felt
that it was honourable thus to die. Doddridge has illustrated the
sentiment by an appropriate reference to a fact stated by Plutarch. A
brave Athenian returned from the battle of Marathon, bleeding with
wounds and exhausted, and rushed into the presence of the magistrates,
and uttered only these two words, \~cairete, cairomen\~ --"rejoice,
we rejoice"--and immediately expired. So Paul felt that there
was occasion for him, and for all whom he loved, to rejoice, if he
was permitted to die in the cause of others, and in such a manner
that his death would benefit the world.
Verse 19. But I trust in the Lord Jesus. His hope was that the Lord
Jesus would so order affairs as to permit this--an expression that
no man could use who did not regard the Lord Jesus as on the
throne, and as more than human.
To send Timotheus shortly unto you. There was a special reason why
Paul desired to send Timothy to them rather than another person, which he
himself states, Philippians 2:22, "Ye know the proof of him, that as a son
with the father, he hath served with me in the gospel." From this
passage, as well as from Philippians 1:1, where Timothy is joined with Paul
in the salutation, it is evident that he had been with the apostle at
Philippi. But this fact is nowhere mentioned in the sixteenth chapter of
the Acts of the Apostles,which contains an account of the visit of Paul
to that place. The narrative in the Acts, however, as Dr. Paley has re-
marked, Horae Paulinae, in loc., is such as to render this altogether
probable; and the manner in which the fact is adverted to here is
such as would have occurred to no one forging an epistle like this,
and shows that the Acts of the Apostles and the epistle are independent
books, and are not the work of imposture. In the Acts of the Apostles it
is said that when Paul came to Derbe and Lystra he found a certain
disciple named Timothy, whom he would have go forth with him,
Acts 16:1-3. The narrative then proceeds with an account of the
progress of Paul through various provinces of Asia Minor, till it brings
him to Troas. There he was warned in a vision to go over into Macedonia.
In pursuance of this call, he passed over the AEgean Sea, came to
Samothracia, and thence to Neapolis, and thence to Philippi. No mention
is made, indeed, of Timothy as being with Paul at Philippi; but after he
had left that city, and had gone to Berea, where the "brethren sent away
Paul," it is added, "but Silas and Timotheus abode there still."
From this it is evident that he had accompanied them in their
journey, and had no doubt been with them at Philippi. For the
argument which Dr. Paley has derived from the manner in which
this subject is mentioned in the Acts, and in this epistle, in favour
of the genuineness of the Scripture account, see Horae Paul on
the epistle to the Philippians, No. iv.
When I know your state. It was a considerable time since Epaphroditus
had left the Philippians, and since, therefore, Paul had been informed of
their condition.
{1} "But I trust" "Moreover"
{a} "Timotheus" 1 Thessalonians 3:2
{*} "state" "affairs"
Verse 20. For I have no man like-minded, Marg., so dear unto me.
The Greek is, \~isoqucon\~ similar in mind, or like-minded. The meaning
is, that there was no one with him who would feel so deep an interest in
their welfare.
Who will naturally care. The word rendered naturally \~gnhsiwv\~
--means sincerely; and the idea is, that he would regard their
interests with a sincere tenderness and concern. He might be depended on
to enter heartily into their concerns. This arose, doubtless, from the
fact that he had been with them when the church was founded there, and
that he felt a deeper interest in what related to the apostle Paul than
any other man. Paul regarded Timothy as a son, and his sending him on
such an occasion would evince the feelings of a father who should send a
beloved son on an important message.
{2} "like minded" "so dear unto me"
{*} "state" "affairs"
Verse 21. For all seek their own. That is, all who are with me. Who
Paul had with him at this time is not fully known, but he doubtless means
that this remark should apply to the mass of Christians and Christian
ministers then in Rome. Perhaps he had proposed to some of them to go and
visit the church at Philippi, and they had declined it because of the
distance and the dangers of the way. When the trial of Paul came on
before the emperor, all who were with him in Rome fled from him,
2 Timothy 4:16; and it is possible that the same disregard of his wishes
and his welfare had already begun to manifest itself among the Christians
who were at Rome, so that he was constrained to say that, as a general
thing, they sought their own ease and comfort, and were unwilling to deny
themselves in order to promote the happiness of those who lived
in the remote parts of the world. Let us not be harsh in judging
them. How many professing Christians in our cities and towns
are there now who would be willing to leave their business and
their comfortable homes, and go on an embassy like this to Philippi? How
many are there who would not seek some excuse, and show that it was a
characteristic that they "sought their own" rather than the things which
pertained to the kingdom of Jesus Christ?
Not the things which are Jesus Christ's. Which pertain
to his cause and kingdom. They are not willing to practise self-denial in
order to promote that cause. It is implied here,
(1.) that it is the duty of those who profess religion to seek the things
which pertain to the kingdom of the Redeemer, or to make that the great
and leading object of their lives. They are bound to be willing to
sacrifice "their own" things--to deny themselves of ease, and to
be always ready to expose themselves to peril and want if they may
be the means of advancing his cause.
(2.) That frequently this is not done by those who profess religion. It
was the case with the professed Christians at Rome, and it is often the
case in the churches now. There are few Christians who deny themselves
much to promote the kingdom of the Redeemer; few who are willing to lay
aside what they regard as "their own" in order to advance his
cause. Men live for their own ease; for their families; for the
prosecution of their own business--as if a Christian could have
anything which he has a right to pursue independently of the kingdom
of the Redeemer, and without regard to his will and glory.
{b} "not the things" 2 Timothy 3:2
Verse 22. But ye know the proof of him. You have had evidence among
yourselves how faithfully Timothy devoted himself to the promotion of the
gospel, and how constantly he served with me. This proves that Timothy
was with Paul when he was at Philippi.
As a son with the father. Manifesting the same spirit towards
me which a son does towards a father, and evincing the same
interest in my work. He did all he could do to aid me, and lighten
my labours and sufferings.
Verse 23. So soon as I shall see how it will go with me. Paul was a
prisoner at Rome, and there was not a little uncertainty whether
he would be condemned or acquitted. He was, it is commonly
supposed, in fact released on the first trial, 2 Timothy 4:16. He now
felt that he would soon be able to send Timothy to them at any
rate. If he was condemned and put to death, he would, of course,
have no further occasion for his services; and if he were released
from his present troubles and dangers, he could spare him for a
season to go and visit the churches.
{*} "with me" "See through my own affairs"
Verse 24. But I trust in the Lord, etc.
See Barnes "Philippians 1:25".
Verse 25. Yet I supposed it necessary to send to you Epaphroditus.
Epaphroditus is nowhere else mentioned but in this epistle. See
Philippians 4:18. All that is known of him, therefore, is what is mentioned
here. He was from Philippi, and was a member of the church
there. He had been employed by the Philippians to carry relief
to Paul when he was in Rome, Philippians 4:18, and while in Rome
he was taken dangerously sick. News of this had been conveyed
to Philippi, and again intelligence had been brought to him that
they had heard of his sickness, and that they were much affected
by it. On his recovery, Paul thought it best that he should return
at once to Philippi, and doubtless sent this epistle by him. He is
much commended by Paul for his faithfulness and zeal.
My brother. In the gospel; or brother Christian. These expressions
of affectionate regard must have been highly gratifying to the
Philippians.
And companion in labour. It is not impossible that he may have
laboured with Paul in the gospel at Philippi; but more probably the
sense is, that he regarded him as engaged in the same great work that he
was. It is not probable that he assisted Paul much in Rome, as he appears
to have been sick during a considerable part of the time he was there.
And fellow-soldier. Christians and Christian ministers are compared
with soldiers, Philemon 1:2; 2 Timothy 2:3,4, because of the nature of
the service in which they are engaged. The Christian life is a warfare;
there are many foes to be overcome; the period which they are to serve
is fixed by the Great Captain of salvation, and they will soon be
permitted to enjoy the triumphs of victory. Paul regarded himself as
enlisted to make war on all the spiritual enemies of the Redeemer,
and he esteemed Epaphroditus as one who had shown that he was worthy to
be engaged in so good a cause.
But your messenger. Sent to convey supplies to Paul, Philippians 4:18.
The original is, "your apostle"--\~umwn de apostolon\~--and some have
proposed to take this literally, meaning that he was the apostle of
the church at Philippi, or that he was their bishop. The advocates for
Episcopacy have been the rather inclined to this, because in
Philippians 1:1, there are but two orders of ministers mentioned--
"bishops and deacons"--from which they have supposed that
"the bishop" might have been absent, and that "the bishop" was
probably this Epaphroditus. But against this supposition the objections
are obvious.
(1.) The word \~apostolon\~ means, properly, one sent forth, a
messenger, and it is uniformly used in this sense unless there is
something in the connexion to limit it to an apostle, technically so
called.
(2.) The supposition that it here means a messenger meets all
the circumstances of the case, and describes exactly what Epaphroditus
did. He was, in fact, sent as a messenger to Paul, Philippians 4:18.
(3.) He was not an apostle, in the proper sense of the term
--the apostles having been chosen to be witnesses of the life, the
teachings, the death, and the resurrection of the Saviour. See
Acts 1:22. See Barnes "1 Corinthians 9:1".
(4.) If he had been an apostle, it is altogether improbable that he
would have been sent on an errand comparatively so humble as that of
carrying supplies to Paul. Was there no one else who could do this,
without sending their bishop? Would a diocese be likely to employ a
"bishop" for such a purpose now?
And he that ministered to my wants. Philippians 4:18.
{b} "my brother" Philippians 4:18
{c} "your messenger" Philemon 1:2
Verse 26. For he longed after you all. He was desirous to see you
all, and to relieve your anxiety in regard to his safety.
{+} "heaviness" "was uneasy"
Verse 27. For indeed he was sick nigh unto death. Dr. Paley has
remarked (Hor. Paul. on Phil. No. ii.) that the account of the
sickness and recovery of Epaphroditus is such as to lead us to suppose
that he was not restored by miracle; and he infers that the power
of healing the sick was conferred on the apostles only occasionally,
and did not depend at all on their will, since, if it had, there is
every reason to suppose that Paul would at once have restored him
to health. This account, he adds, shows also that this epistle is
not the work of an impostor. Had it been, a miracle would not
have been spared. Paul would not have been introduced as showing such
anxiety about a friend lying at the point of death, and as being unable
to restore him. It would have been said that he interposed at once, and
raised him up to health.
But God had mercy on him. By restoring him to health, evidently not
by miracle, but by the use of ordinary means.
On me also, lest I should have sorrow upon sorrow. In addition to all
the sorrows of imprisonment, and the prospect of a trial, and the want
of friends. The sources of his sorrow, had Epaphroditus died, would have
been such as these:
(1.) He would have lost a valued friend, and one whom he esteemed as a
brother and worthy fellow-labourer.
(2.) He would have felt that the church at Philippi had lost a valuable
member.
(3.) His grief might have been aggravated from the consideration that
his life had been lost in endeavouring to do him good. He would have
felt that he was the occasion, though innocent, of his exposure to
danger.
Verse 28. I sent him therefore the more carefully. With more
diligence, or speed; I was the more ready to send him.
That I may be the less sorrowful. That is, on account of my
solicitude for you; that I may know that your minds are at ease, and
that you rejoice in his being among you.
{++} "carefully" "speedily"
Verse 29. Receive him therefore in the Lord. As the servant of the
Lord, or as now restored to you by the Lord, and therefore to be
regarded as a fresh gift from God. Our friends, restored to us after
a long absence, we should receive as the gift of God, and as a proof
of his mercy.
And hold such in reputation. Marg., honour such. This is a high
commendation of Epaphroditus, and, at the same time, it enjoins an
important duty in regard to the proper treatment of those who sustain
such a character. It is a Christian duty to honour those who ought to be
honoured, to respect the virtuous and the pious, and especially to
honour those who evince fidelity in the work of the Lord.
{1} "hold such" "honour such"
Verse 30. Because for the work of Christ. That is, either by exposing
himself in his journey to see the apostle in Rome, or by his labours
there.
Not regarding his life. There is a difference in the Mss.
here, so great that it is impossible now to determine which is the
true reading, though the sense is not materially affected. The
common reading of the Greek text is, \~parabouleusamenov\~; literally,
misconsulting, not consulting carefully, not taking pains. The other
reading is, \~paraboleusamenov\~; exposing one's self to danger, regardless
of life. See the authorities for this reading in Wetstein. Comp.
Bloomfield, in loc. This reading suits the connexion, and is
generally regarded as the correct one.
To supply your lack of service toward me. Not that they had been
indifferent to him, or inattentive to his wants, for he does not mean to
blame them; but they had not had an opportunity to send to his relief,
Philippians 4:10, and Epaphroditus therefore made a special journey to Rome
on his account. He came and rendered to him the service which they
could not do in person; and what the church would have done, if
Paul had been among them, he performed in their name and on their behalf.
{d} "to supply" 1 Corinthians 16:17
{&} "lack" "deficiency"
REMARKS.
1. Let us learn to esteem others as they ought to be, Philippians 2:3.
Every person who is virtuous and pious has some claim to esteem
He has a reputation which is valuable to him and to the church,
and we should not withhold respect from him. It is one evidence,
also, of true humility and of right feeling, when we esteem them
as better than ourselves, and when we are willing to see them
honoured, and are willing to sacrifice our own ease to promote
their welfare. It is one of the instinctive promptings of true humility
to feel that other persons are better than we are.
2. We should not be disappointed or mortified if others think
little of us--if we are not brought into prominent notice among
men, Philippians 2:3. We profess to have a low opinion of ourselves,
if we are Christians, and we ought to have; and why should we be
chagrined and mortified if others have the same opinion of us? Why
should we not be willing that they should accord in judgment with
us in regard to ourselves?
3. We should be willing to occupy our appropriate place in the
church, Philippians 2:3. That is true humility; and why should any one
be unwilling to be esteemed just as he ought to be? Pride makes
us miserable, and is the grand thing that stands in the way of the
influence of the gospel on our hearts. No one can become a Christian
who is not willing to occupy just the place which he ought to
occupy; to take the lowly position as a penitent which he ought to
take; and to have God regard and treat him just as he ought to be
treated. The first, second, and third thing in religion is humility;
and no one ever becomes a Christian who is not willing to take the
lowly condition of a child.
4. We should feel a deep interest in the welfare of others,
Philippians 2:4. Men are by nature selfish, and it is the design of
religion to make them benevolent. They seek their own interests by
nature, and the gospel would teach them to regard the welfare of others.
If we are truly under the influence of religion, there is not a member
of the church in whom we should not feel an interest, and whose
welfare we should not strive to promote, as far as we have opportunity.
And we may have opportunity every day. It is an easy matter to do
good to others. A kind word, or even a kind look, does good; and who
is so poor that he cannot render this? Every day that we live, we come
in contact with some who may be benefited by our example, our advice, or
our alms; and every day, therefore, may be closed with the feeling that
we have not lived in vain.
5. Let us in all things look to the example of Christ, Philippians 2:5.
He came that he might be an example; and he was exactly such
an example as we need. We may be always sure that we are right
when we follow his example, and possess his spirit. We cannot
be so sure that we are right in any other way. He came to be our
model in all things, and in all the relations of life.
(1.) He showed us what the law of God requires of us.
(2.) He showed us what we should aim to be, and what human nature would
be if it were wholly under the influence of religion.
(3.) He showed us what true religion is, for it is just such as was seen
in his life.
(4.) He showed us how to act in our treatment of mankind.
(5.) He showed us how to bear the ills of poverty, and want, and pain,
and temptation, and reproach from the world. We should learn to
manifest the same spirit in suffering which he did, for then we are
sure we are right.
(6.) And he has showed us how to die. He has exhibited in death just
the spirit which we should when we die; for it is not less desirable
to die well than to live well.
6. It is right and proper to worship Christ, Philippians 2:6. He was in the
form of God, and equal with God; and, being such, we should adore him.
No one need be afraid to render too high honour to the Saviour; and all
piety may be measured by the respect which is shown to him. Religion
advances in the world just in proportion as men are disposed to render
honour to the Redeemer; it becomes dim, and dies away, just in proportion
as that honour is withheld.
7. Like the Redeemer, we should be willing to deny ourselves
in order that we may promote the welfare of others, Philippians 2:6-8. We
can never, indeed, equal his condescension. We can never stoop from such
a state of dignity and honour as he did; but, in our measure, we should
aim to imitate him. If we have comforts, we should be willing to deny
ourselves of them to promote the happiness of others. If we occupy an
elevated rank in life, we should be willing to stoop to one more humble.
If we live in a palace, we should be willing to enter the most
lowly cottage, if we can render its inmates happy.
8. Christ was obedient unto death, Philippians 2:8. Let us be obedient
also, doing the will of God in all things. If in his service we are
called to pass through trials, even those which will terminate in
death, let us obey. He has a right to command us, and we have
the example of the Saviour to sustain us. If he requires us, by
his providence, and by the leadings of his Spirit, to forsake our
country and home, to visit climes of pestilential air, or to traverse
wastes of burning sand, to make his name known; if he demands
that, in that service, we shall die far away from kindred and home,
and that our bones shall be laid on the banks of the Senegal or the
Ganges--still, let us remember that these sufferings are not equal
to those of the Master. He was an exile from heaven, in a world
of suffering. Our exile from our own land is not like that from
heaven; nor will our sufferings, though in regions of pestilence and
death, be like his sufferings in the garden and on the Cross.
9. Let us rejoice that we have a Saviour who has ascended to
heaven, and who is to be for ever honoured there, Philippians 2:9-11. He
is to suffer no more. He has endured the last pang; has passed
through a state of humiliation and woe which he will never repeat;
and has submitted to insults and mockeries to which it will not be
necessary for him to submit again. When we now think of the
Redeemer, we can think of him as always happy and honoured.
There is no moment by day or by night in which he is not the
object of adoration, love, and praise--nor will there ever be such a
moment to all eternity. Our best friend is thus to be eternally
reverenced, and in heaven he will receive a full reward for all his
unparalleled woes.
10. Let us diligently endeavour to work out our salvation,
Philippians 2:12,13. Nothing else so much demands our unceasing solicitude
as this, and in nothing else have we so much encouragement. We
are assured that God aids us in this work. He throws no obstructions in
our path, but all that God does in the matter of salvation
is in the way of help. He does not work in us evil passions, or
impure desires, or unbelief; his agency is to enable us to perform
"his good pleasure," or that which will please him--that is, that
which is holy. The farmer is encouraged to plough and plant his
fields when God works around him by sending the warm breezes of
the spring, and by refreshing the earth with gentle dews and rains.
And so we may be encouraged to seek our salvation when God
works in our hearts, producing serious thoughts, and a feeling that
we need the blessings of salvation.
11. Christians should let their light shine, Philippians 2:14-16. God
has called them into his kingdom that they may show what is the
nature and power of true religion. They are to illustrate in their
lives the nature of that gospel which he has revealed, and to show
its value in purifying the soul and in sustaining it in the time of
trial. The world is dependent on Christians for just views of religion,
and every day that a Christian lives he is doing something to
honour or dishonour the gospel. Every word that he speaks,
every expression of the eye, every cloud or beam of sunshine on
his brow, will have some effect in doing this. He cannot live
without making some impression upon the world around him, either
favourable or unfavourable to the cause of his Redeemer.
12. We should be ready to die, if called to such a sacrifice, in
behalf of the church of Christ, Philippians 2:17. We should rejoice in being
permitted to suffer, that we may promote the welfare of others,
and be the means of saving those for whom Christ died. It has
been an honour to be a martyr in the cause of religion, and so it
ever will be when God calls to such a sacrifice of life. If he calls
us to it, therefore, we should not shrink from it, nor should we
shrink from any sufferings by which we may honour the Saviour,
and rescue souls from death.
13. Let us learn, from the interesting narrative respecting Epaphroditus
at the close of this chapter, to live and act as becomes Christians in
every situation in life, Philippians 2:25-30. It was much to have the praise
of an apostle, and to be commended for his Christian conduct, as this
stranger in Rome was. He went there, not to view the wonders of the
imperial city, and not to run the rounds of giddy pleasure there, but to
perform an important duty of religion. While there he became sick--not by
indulgence in pleasures; not as the result of feasting and revelry, but
in the work of Christ. In a strange city, far from home, amidst the rich,
the great, the gay; in a place where theatres opened their doors, and
where places of amusement abounded, he led a life which an apostle
could commend as pure. There is nothing more difficult for a
Christian than to maintain an irreproachable walk when away from
the usual restraints and influences that serve to keep him in the
paths of piety, and when surrounded with the fascinations and
allurements of a great and wicked city. There strangers, extending the
rites of hospitality, often invite the guest to places of amusement
which the Christian would not visit were he at home. There the desire to
see all that is to be seen, and to hear all that is to be heard,
attracts him to the theatre, the opera, and the gallery of obscene and
licentious statuary and painting. There the plea readily presents itself
that an opportunity of witnessing these things may never occur again;
that he is unknown, and that his example, therefore, can do no harm;
that it is desirable, from personal observation, to know what is the
condition of the world; or that perhaps his former views in these matters
may have been precise and puritanical. To such considerations he yields;
but yields only to regret it in future life. Rarely is such a thing done
without its being in some way soon known; and rarely, very rarely, does a
Christian minister or other member of the church travel much without
injury to his piety, and to the cause of religion. A Christian man who
is under a necessity of visiting Europe from this country, should
feel that he has special need of the prayers of his friends, that he may
not dishonour his religion abroad; he who is permitted to remain at home,
and to cultivate the graces of piety in his own family, and in the quiet
scenes where he has been accustomed to move, should regard it as a cause
of special thankfulness to God.