Bible Commentaries

Matthew 24:1-3 — Matthew 24:1-3 . Introduction ( cf. Mark 13:1-4 ; Luke 21:5-7 ).

Matthew 26:14-16 — Judas ofrece traicionar a Jesús ( Marco 14:10-11 ; Lucas 22:3-6 ).

Matthew 3:7-10 — Palabras de reprensión y advertencia a los visitantes no deseados ( Lucas 3:7-9 ).

Mark 13:1-4 — Mark 13:1-4 . The introduction (Matthew 24:1-3 ; Luke 21:5-7 ).

Mark 14:10-11 — Judas ofrece traicionar a su Maestro ( Mateo 26:14-16 ; Lucas 22:3-6 ).

Luke 20:3 — Luke 20:3 . λόγον : without the ἕνα of the parallels. Vide notes there.

Acts 22:24 — Acts 22:24 . ὁ χιλ ., see Acts 21:31 . παρεμ ., Acts 21:34 . εἰπὼν : whether the chiliarch understood Paul’s words or not, he evidently saw from the outcries of the mob that the Apostle was regarded as a dangerous person, and he probably thought to obtain some definite information

Acts 23:25 — Acts 23:25 . περιέχουσαν , see critical note above. τύπον : “form,” R.V., a précis or summary of the contents of a letter, 3Ma 3:30 . Such a letter would be called elogium , Alford, in loco , Renan, Saint Paul , p. 532. It is quite true that

Romans 14:6 — The indifference of the questions at issue, from the religious point of view, is shown by the fact that both parties, by the line of action they choose, have the same end in view viz. , the interest of the Lord. ὁ φρονῶν τὴν ἡμέραν cf. Colossians 3:2 . The setting of the mind upon the day implies of course some distinction between it and others. The clause καὶ ὁ μὴ φρονῶν … οὐ φρονεῖ is omitted by most editors, but its absence from most MSS. might still be due to homœoteleuton . εὐχαριστεῖ :

1 Corinthians 15:11 — being drawn, to sum up the statement of fact and evidence concerning Christ’s resurrection: “Whether then it were I (1 Corinthians 15:8 f.) or they (Kephas, the Twelve, the first disciples, James 5 ff.), so we proclaim (1 Corinthians 15:3 f.), and so you believed (1 Corinthians 15:2 )”. For εἴτε , εἴτε , giving alternatives indifferent from the point of view assumed, cf. 1 Corinthians 3:22 , 1 Corinthians 10:31 , etc. οὕτως is emphatic: in the essential matters of 1 Corinthians

1 Corinthians 8:4 — 1 Corinthians 8:4 . After his thrust at Cor [1233] γνῶσις , P. resumes, with οὖν ( cf. 1 Corinthians 11:17-20 ), from 1 Corinthians 8:1 the question “About the eating of idolothyta,” repeating the “we know” at which he had interrupted his correspondents. For οἴδαμεν in a

2 Corinthians 1:24 — 1:24 . This verse is parenthetical, and introduced to guard against misunderstanding. οὐχ ὅτι κυριεύομεν ὑμῶν τῆς πίστεως : not that we have lordship over your faith . This is not the department of his Apostolic authority ( cf. Luke 22:25 , 1 Peter 5:3 ). ἀλλὰ συνεργοί κ . τ . λ .: but we are (only) fellow-workers in (producing) your joy ; a parenthesis within a parenthesis, not necessary to the sense, but added to emphasise once more his sense of the common ties between him and the Corinthians

2 Corinthians 3:13 — 2 Corinthians 3:13 . καὶ οὐ καθάπερ κ . τ . λ .: and (we put no veil upon our face) as Moses put a veil upon his face . The construction is broken, but the sense is obvious; cf. , for a somewhat similar abbreviation, Mark 15:8 , ὁ ὄχλος ἤρξατο αἰτεῖσθαι καθὼς ἐποίει

Philippians 3:12-16 — Philippians 3:12-16 . THE MARK OF THE MATURE CHRISTIAN, TO PRESS FORWARD.

Philippians 3:7-9 — Philippians 3:7-9 . EARTHLY GAINS COUNTED LOSS THAT HE MIGHT WIN CHRIST.

1 Thessalonians 2:17-20 — 1 Thessalonians 2:17 to 1 Thessalonians 3:13 . Paul’s apologia pro absentia suâ .

1 Thessalonians 3:1-13 — 1 Thessalonians 2:17 to 1 Thessalonians 3:13 . Paul’s apologia pro absentia suâ .

1 Thessalonians 3:1-13 — a 1 Tesalonicenses 3:13 . La apología de Pablo pro absentia suâ .

1 John 3:10-12 — 1 John 3:10-12 . The Evidence of Divine Sonship, viz. , Human Brotherhood.

1 John 3:4-8 — 1 John 3:4-8 . The Incompatibility of Sonship with Continuance in Sin.