Lectionary Calendar
Wednesday, April 17th, 2024
the Third Week after Easter
StudyLight.org has pledged to help build churches in Uganda. Help us with that pledge and support pastors in the heart of Africa.
Click here to join the effort!

Bible Lexicons

Gesenius Hebrew Grammer

Part 96

§96. Nouns of Peculiar Formation.
In the following Paradigms,[1] pp. 282 to 284, a number of frequently used nouns are arranged, whose flexion presents more or less striking peculiarities. These peculiarities, however, are almost always subordinate to the usual phonetic laws, and the usual designation of the nouns as irregular is, therefore, not justified, when once the ground-forms are properly recognized on which the present forms are based.
Sing. absolute אָב‎ אָח‎ אָחוֹת‎ אִישׁ‎ אִשָּׁה‎
(father) (brother) (sister) (man) (woman)
" construct אֲבִי‎ אֲחִי‎ אֲחוֹת‎ אִישׁ‎ אֵ֫שֶׁת‎
" with suff. of 1 sing. אָבִי‎ אָחִי‎ אֲחֹתִי‎ אִישִׁי‎ אִשְׁתִּי‎
" 2 masc. אָבִ֫יךָ‎ אָחִ֫יךָ‎ אֲחֽוֹתְךָ‎ אִשְׁתְּךָ‎
" 2 fem. אָבִיךְ‎ אָחִיךְ‎ אֲחוֹתֵךְ‎ אִישֵׁךְ‎
" 3 masc. אָבִיו (אָבִ֫יהוּ)‎ אָחִיו (אָחִ֫יהוּ)‎ אֲחֹתוֹ‎ אִישׁוֹ‎ אִשְׁתּוֹ‎
" 3 fem. אָבִ֫יהָ‎ אָחִ֫יהָ‎ אֲחֹתָהּ‎ אִישָׁהּ‎
" 1 Pl. אָבִ֫ינוּ‎ אָחִ֫ינוּ‎ אֲחֹתֵ֫נוּ‎
" 2 masc. אֲבִיכֶם‎ אֲחִיכֶם‎ [אֲחֽוֹתְכֶם]‎
" 2 fem. אֲבִיכֶן‎
" 3 masc. אֲבִיהֶם‎ אֲחִיהֶם‎ אֲחֹתָם‎
" 3 fem. אֲבִיהֶן‎
Plur. absolute. אָבוֹת‎ אַחִים‎ אֲנָשִׁים‎ נָשִׁים‎
" construct אֲבוֹת‎ אֲחֵי‎ אַנְשֵׁי‎ נְשֵׁי‎
" with suff. of 1 sing. אֲבֹתַי‎ אַחַי‎, pause אֶחָי‎ אַחְיוֹתַי‎ אֲנָשַׁי‎ נָשַׁי‎
" 2 masc. אֲבֹתֶ֫יךָ‎ אַחֶ֫יךָ‎ אֲנָשֶׁ֫יךָ‎ נָשֶׁ֫יךָ‎
" 2 fem. אַחַ֫יִךְ‎ אֲחוֹתַ֫יִךְ‎
" 3 masc. אֲבֹתָיו‎ אֶחָיו‎ אַחְיֹתָיו‎ אֲנָשָׁיו‎ נָשָׁיו‎
" 3 fem. אַחֶ֫יהָ‎ אֲנָשֶׁ֫יהָ‎
" 1 Pl. אֲבֹתֵ֫ינוּ‎ אַחֵ֫ינוּ‎ אֲנָשֵׁ֫ינוּ‎ נָשֵׁ֫ינוּ‎
" 2 masc. אֲבֹֽתֵיכֶם‎ אֲחֵיכֶם‎ אֲחֽוֹתֵיכֶם‎ נְשֵׁיכֶם‎
" 3 masc. אֲבֹתָם (אֲבֹֽתֵיהֶם)‎ אֲחֵיהֶם‎ אַחְיֹֽתֵיהֶם‎ אַנְשֵׁיהֶם‎ נְשֵׁיהֶם‎
" 3 fem. אַנְשֵׁיהֶן‎

אָב‎ father; the constr. אֲבִי‎, like אֲחִי‎ and בְּנִי‎ (which occurs once), belongs to the connective forms discussed in §90k, which serve as the model for the Ḥireq compaginis. However, אַב‎ also occurs in compound proper names, e.g. אַבְשָׁלוֹם‎, beside אֲבִֽישָׁלוֹם‎, &c.; also Genesis 17:4 אַב־הֲמוֹן‎ for the purpose of explaining the name אב[ר]הם‎. On the plur. אָבוֹת‎ see §87p.

אָח‎ brother. The plur. absol. אַחִים‎ has Dageš forte implicitum (§22c); אֶחָיו‎ stands for אַחָיו‎ according to the phonetic law stated in §27q, and so also אֶחָֽי‎ in pause for אַחָֽי‎. The sharpening of the ח‎ merely serves to keep the preceding Pathaḥ short, as in גְּמַלִּים‎, &c. (§93ee).

אֶחָד‎ one (for אַחָד‎, likewise with Dageš forte implicitum, §22c, cf. §27q), constr. and otherwise in close connexion, אַחַד‎, Genesis 48:22, 2 Samuel 17:22, Isaiah 27:12,
אָמָה‎ בַּ֫יִת‎ בֵּן‎ בַּת‎ יוֹם‎ כְּלִי‎
(handmaid) (house) (son) (daughter) (day) (vessel)
בֵּית‎ בֶּן־‎ בַּת‎ יוֹם‎ כְּלִי‎
אֲמָתִי‎ בֵּיתִי‎ בְּנִי‎ בִּתִּי‎
אֲמָֽתְךָ‎ בֵּֽיתְךָ‎ בִּנְךָ‎, pause בִּנֶ֫ךָ‎ בִּתְּךָ‎, pause בִּתֶּ֫ךָ‎ כֶּלְיְךָ‎
בֵּיתֵךְ‎ בְּנֵךְ‎
אֲמָתוֹ‎ בֵּיתוֹ‎ בְּנוֹ‎ בִּתּוֹ‎ יוֹמוֹ‎
אֲמָתָהּ‎ בֵּיתָהּ‎ בְּנָהּ‎ בִּתָּהּ‎
בֵּֽיתְכֶם‎ בִּתְּכֶם‎
בֵּיתָם‎ יוֹמָם‎
אֲמָהוֹת‎ בָּֽתִּים‎ בָּנִים‎ בָּנוֹת‎ יָמִים‎ כֵּלִים‎
אַמְהוֹת‎ בָּֽתֵּי‎ בְּנֵי‎ בְּנוֹת‎ יְמֵי‎ כְּלֵי‎
אַמְהֹתַי‎ בָּנַי‎ בְּנֹתַי‎ יָמַי‎ כֵּלַי‎
בָּֽתֶּ֫יךָ‎ בָּנֶ֫יךָ‎ בְּנֹתֶ֫יךָ‎ יָמֶ֫יךָ‎ כֵּלֶ֫יךָ‎
בָּֽתַּ֫יִךְ‎ בָּנַ֫יִךְ‎ בְּנֹתַ֫יִךְ‎ יָמַ֫יִךְ‎
אַמְהֹתָיו‎ בָּנָיו‎ בְּנֹתָיו‎ יָמָיו‎ כֵּלָיו‎
אַמְהֹתֶ֫יהָ‎ בָּנֶ֫יהָ‎ בְּנֹתֶ֫יהָ‎ יָמֶ֫יהָ‎ כֵּלֶ֫יהָ‎
בָּֽתֵּ֫ינוּ‎ בָּנֵ֫ינוּ‎ בְּנֹתֵ֫ינוּ‎ יָמֵ֫ינוּ‎ כֵּלֵ֫ינוּ‎
אַמְהֹֽתֵיכֶם‎ בָּֽתֵּיכֶם‎ בְּנֵיכֶם‎ בְּנֹֽתֵיכֶם‎ יְמֵיכֶם‎ כְּלֵיכֶם‎
בָּֽתֵּיהֶם‎ בְּנֵיהֶם‎ בְּנֹֽתֵיהֶם‎ יְמֵיהֶם‎ כְּלֵיהֶם‎
אַמְהֹֽתֵיהֶן‎ בָּֽתֵּיהֶן‎ בְּנֵיהֶן‎

Zechariah 11:7; and especially before מִן‎ (מֵ‍‎) Genesis 3:22, Exodus 30:14, Numbers 16:15, Judges 17:5, 1 Samuel 9:3, Ezekiel 18:10; fem. אַחַת‎ una (for אַחַדְתְּ‎, according to §19d), in pause אֶחָֽת‎. Once חַד‎ masc. (by aphaeresis, §19h), Ezekiel 33:30, as in Aramaic; plur. אֲחָדִים‎ some, but also iidem.

אָחוֹת‎ sister, from ʾăḥăwăt or ʾăḥăyăt, with elision of the ו‎ or י‎, and with the â, which has arisen from ăă, obscured to ô.[2] In Numbers 6:7 אַחֹתוֹ‎ stands for אֲחֹתוֹ‎ (with virtual sharpening of the ח‎). The plur. absol. (אֲחָיוֹת‎) does not happen
[מַי]‎ עִיר‎ פֶּה‎ רֹאשׁ‎ שֵׁם‎ [שָׁמַי]‎
(water) (city) (mouth) (head) (name) (heaven)
עִיר‎ פִּי‎ רֹאשׁ‎ שֵׁם‎, שֶׁם־‎
עִירִי‎ פִּי‎ רֹאשִׁי‎ שְׁמִי‎
עִֽירְךָ‎ פִּ֫יךָ‎ רֹֽאשְׁךָ‎ שִׁמְךָ‎, pause שְׁמֶ֫ךָ‎
רֹאשֵׁךְ‎ שְׁמֵךְ‎
עִירוֹ‎ פִּיו‎, פִּ֫יהוּ‎ רֹאשׁוֹ‎ שְׁמוֹ‎
עִירָהּ‎ פִּ֫יהָ‎ רֹאשָׁהּ‎ שְׁמָהּ‎
פִּ֫ינוּ‎ רֹאשֵׁ֫נוּ‎ שְׁמֵ֫נוּ‎
פִּיכֶם‎ רֹֽאשְׁכֶם‎ שִׁמְכֶם‎
עִירָם‎ פִּיהֶם‎ רֹאשָׁם‎ שְׁמָם‎
פִּיהֶן‎ רֹאשָׁן‎
מַ֫יִם‎ עָרִים‎ פִּיּוֹת‎ רָאשִׁים‎ שֵׁמוֹת‎ שָׁמַ֫יִם‎
מֵי‎, מֵימֵי‎ עָרֵי‎ רָאשֵׁי‎ שְׁמוֹת‎ שְׁמֵי‎
מֵימַי‎ עָרַי‎
מֵימֶ֫יךָ‎ עָרֶ֫יךָ‎ שָׁמֶ֫יךָ‎
מֵימָיו‎ עָרָיו‎ רָאשָׁיו‎ שָׁמָיו‎
מֵימֶ֫יהָ‎ עָרֶ֫יהָ‎ רָאשֶׁ֫יהָ‎
מֵימֵ֫ינוּ‎ עָרֵ֫ינוּ‎ רָאשֵׁ֫ינוּ‎
עָֽרֵיכֶם‎ רָֽאשֵׁיכֶם‎ שְׁמֵיכֶם‎
מֵֽימֵיהֶם‎ עָֽרֵיהֶם‎ רָֽאשֵׁיהֶם‎ שְׁמוֹתָם‎
רָֽאשֵׁיהֶן‎ שְׁמוֹתָן‎

to occur. In Ezekiel 16:52 אַֽחֲיוֹתֵךְ‎ occurs (for אַחְיֹתַ֫יִךְ‎). In the forms אֲחוֹתַי‎ Joshua 2:13 Keth., אֲחוֹתַ֫יִךְ‎ Ezekiel 16:515561 (to be read also in verse 45 for אֲחוֹתֵךְ‎, which has been erroneously assimilated to the singular occurring in vv. 48, 49, 56), and אֲחֽוֹתֵיכֶם‎ Hosea 2:3 (for which, however, read אֲחֽוֹתְכֶם‎), the third radical has been entirely lost.

אִישׁ‎ man, according to the common opinion either incorrectly lengthened for אֵשׁ‎ (from ʾišš, with assimilation of the Nûn of the ground-form ʾinš, which again has been attenuated from ʾanš from the stem אָנַשׁ‎), or softened directly from ʾinš. It is, however, probable that a separate stem (אישׁ‎ to be strong?) is to be assumed for the singular[3]; consequently the stem אָנַשׁ‎ to be sociable, would be connected only with the plur. אֲנָשִׁים‎ (אִישִׁים‎ is found only in Isaiah 53:3, Psalms 141:4, Proverbs 8:4).

אָמָה‎ slave, handmaid; with the plur. אֲמָהוֹת‎, with consonantal ה‎, cf. in Aram. אֲבָהָן‎ fathers, and similarly in Phoen. דלהת‎ from דלת‎, also Arab. ʾabahât (fathers), ʾummahât (mothers), with an artificial expansion into a triliteral stem.

אִשָּׂה‎ woman, probably for אִנְשָׁה‎; from אָנַשׁ‎ i.e. not (as Aram. אִתְּתָא‎ shows) אָנַשׁ‎ to be sociable (see above, on אִישׁ‎) but אָנַשׁ‎ to be weak (Arab. ʾănŭṯă). So De Lagarde, Uebersicht, p. 68; König, Lehrgeb., ii. 159 f. The form אֵ֫שֶׁת‎ (for ʾišt, with ת‎ fem., from ʾišš, after rejection of the doubling and lengthening of the ĭ to ē) occurs in Deuteronomy 21:11, 1 Samuel 28:7, Psalms 58:9, even in absol. st. [cf., however, below, §130. 4, 5].—In Psalms 128:3 אֶשְׁתְּךָ‎ is found for אִשְׁתְּךָ‎. Instead of the plur. נָשִׁים‎, we find in Ezekiel 23:44 אִשֹּׁת‎.[4]

בַּ֫יִת‎ house, locative בַּ֫יְתָה‎, הַבַּ֫יְתָה‎, in pause בָּ֫יְתָה‎, הַבָּ֫יְתָה‎, constr. בֵּ֫יתָה‎, plur. בָּֽתִּים‎ (but in Deuteronomy 6:11, 1 Chronicles 28:11 בָּתִּים‎ without Metheg), pronounced bâttîm. The explanation of the Dageš in the ת‎ is still a matter of dispute. The Syriac bâttîn, however, shows that the Dageš is original, and belongs to the character of the form.[5] According to Wright, Comparative Grammar, p. 88, בָּֽתִּים‎ is simply contracted from bai-tîm (as אָן‎ from אַ֫יִן‎, עֵינָם‎ from עֵינָיִם‎, &c.), and the Dageš, therefore, is lene; König, Lehrgeb., ii. 56, proposes the name Dageš forte orthoconsonanticum; on the other hand Rahlfs, ThLZ. 1896, col. 587, suggests that the י‎ is assimilated to the ת‎, while Philippi, ZDMG. xlix, p. 206, assumes for the plural a stem distinct from that of the singular. A definite solution is at present impossible. The incorrectness of the formerly common pronunciation bottîm is sufficiently shown by the Babylonian punctuation (see §8g, note 3), which leaves no doubt as to the â.

בֵּן‎ son (Genesis 30:19 בֵּֽן־שִׁשִּׁי‎) constr. usually בֶּן־‎ (also with a conjunctive accent as an equivalent for Maqqeph, Genesis 17:17, Isaiah 8:2, &c., 1 Chronicles 9:21; even with smaller disjunctives, especially in the combination מִבֶּן‎, Exodus 30:14, Leviticus 27:3, &c. [מִבֶּן־‎ only after וְאִם‎ and before חֹ֫דֶשׁ‎, also in Isaiah 51:12; see Strack on Exodus 30:14]), rarely בִּן־‎ (Deuteronomy 25:2, Jonah 4:10 twice, Proverbs 30:1, and so always in the combination בִּן־נוּן‎, and in the proper names בִּנְיָמִין‎ [but בֶּן־יִמִינִי‎ Benjamite] and בִּן־יָקֶה‎ Proverbs 30:1), once בְּנִי‎ (cf. §90l) Genesis 49:11, and בְּנוֹ‎ (§90o) Numbers 23:18, Numbers 24:315.—In Genesis 49:22 בֵּן‎, for which בֶּן־‎ ought to be read, is intended by the Masora for the absol. st., not the constr. בַּת‎ daughter (from bant, and this again, according to the law stated in §69c, for bint, fem. of בֵּן‎), with suff. בִּתִּי‎ for בִּנְתִּי‎. Plur. בָּנוֹת‎, from the sing. בָּנָה‎, comp. בָּנִים‎ sons.

חָם‎ husband’s father, only with suff. חָמִיךְ‎, חָמִ֫יהָ‎; and חָמוֹת‎ husband’s mother, only with suff. חֲמוֹתֵךְ‎, חֲמוֹתָהּ‎. Cf. אָב‎, אָח‎, and especially אָחוֹת‎.

יוֹם‎ day (Arab. yaum),[6] dual יוֹמַ֫יִם‎; the plur. יָמִים‎ is probably from a different sing. (יָם‎ yām), constr. יְמֵי‎ and (poetically) יְמוֹת‎, Deuteronomy 32:7, Psalms 90:15.

כְּלִי‎ vessel, in pause כֶּ֫לִי‎ (with suff. כֶּלְיְךָ‎ Deuteronomy 23:25) from כָּלָה‎ to contain, plur. כֵּלִים‎ (as if from כֵּל‎, כֵּ֫לֶה‎; according to König, ii. 63, shortened from kilyîm).

מַ֫יִם‎ water; on the plur. cf. §88d.

עִיר‎ city. The plur. עָרִים‎ is scarcely syncopated from עֲיָרִים‎, as it is pointed in Judges 10:4 (no doubt erroneously, in imitation of the preceding עֲיָרִים‎ ass colts), but from a kindred sing. עָר‎, which still occurs in proper names.

פֶּה‎ mouth, constr, st. פִּי‎ (for original פֵּי‎ = פֵּה‎?). Its origin is still disputed. According to Gesenius and König (ii. 103), פֶּה‎ stands for פֵּאֶה‎ (ground-form piʿay) from פָּאָה‎ to breathe, to blow; according to Olshausen, for פַּי‎, from a stem פָּיָה‎ or פָּוָה‎. But parallel with the Hebrew פֶּה‎ are Assyr. , Arab. fû, fam, famm, fumm, bibl. Aram. פֻּם‎, פֻּמָּא‎, Syr. pûm, pûmā, so that Barth, ZDMG. xli, p. 634, assumes two forms of development from the same stem (פמו‎), viz. fm and fw. פִּי‎ my mouth, from pi-y; for פִּיהֶם‎ we find in Psalms 17:10, Psalms 58:7, Psalms 59:13 פִּ֫ימוֹ‎. The supposed plur. פִּים‎ 1 Samuel 13:21 is generally explained as a contraction from פִּיִּים‎, but the text is altogether corrupt. The plur. פִּיּוֹת‎, for the edges of a sword, occurs in Proverbs 5:4; reduplicated פִּֽיפִיוֹת‎ Isaiah 41:15, Psalms 149:6.

רֹאשׁ‎ head (obscured from רָאשׁ‎=răʾš); plur. רָאשִׁים‎ (for רְאָשִׁים‎, §23c); רֹאשָׁיו‎ only in Isaiah 15:2.

שֶׂה‎ a head of small cattle (sheep or goat), constr. st. שֵׂה‎, with suff. שְׂיֵ֫הוּ‎ 1 Samuel 14:34 and שֵׂיוֹ‎ Deuteronomy 22:1, according to König, ii. 131, from a ground-form siʾay, but according to De Lagarde, Uebersicht, 81 f., from a stem ושי‎ (שֶׂה‎=say=wĭsay).

שֵׁם‎ name, constr. generally שֵׁם‎ (only six times שֶׁם־‎); cf. בֵּן‎.

שָׁמַ֫יִם‎ heaven (§88d).

  1. The only omissions from these Paradigms are אֶחָד‎, חָם‎, and חָמוֹת‎ (on which see the remarks), and all forms which are not found in the O.T.
  2. This explanation of אָחוֹת‎ (and חָמוֹת‎ q. v.) still seems to us more probable than the assumption that the fem. ending ăth is lengthened to compensate for the loss of the 3rd radical (so Wellhausen, Skizzen, vi. 258), or that the form is derived from ʾaḥâ, the old-semitic constr. st. of the accusative, with ת‎ feminine (so Barth, ZDMG. 1899, p. 598).
  3. So already Gesenius in his Thes. Linguae Hebr., i. 83 f., and recently again Friedr. Delitzsch, Prolegg., p. 160 ff., Praetorius in Kuhn’s Orient. L.-B., 1884, p. 196; König, Lehrgeb., ii. 38; while Nöldeke (ZDMG. 1886, p. 739 f.), against Delitzsch, would connect both אִישׁ‎ and נָשִׁים‎ with the stem אנשׁ‎.
  4. Friedr. Delitzsch (in his Babylonian glosses to Baer’s text of Ezekiel, p. xi) on Ezekiel 23:44 remarks that in Assyro-Babylonian the plur. of aššatu (woman) is aššâti, corresponding, therefore, to אִשּׁוֹת‎, not to the ordinary plur. נָשִׁים‎. The a of נָשִׁים‎ (instead of i as in Arab. or e as in Syr.) is to be explained with Barth (Orient. Studien zu Ehren Th. Nöldekes, Giessen, 1906, p. 792) from the natural connexion of the ideas ‘men’ and ‘women’, נָשִׁים‎ and אֲנָשִׁים‎.
  5. This disposes of the traditional view that the Dageš (after a firm Metheg, see §16f ζ) only serves to distinguish if from בָּתִים‎ passing the night, ptcp. Qal of בּוּת‎, a stem which never occurs in the O.T. According to P. Haupt the stem is בא‎ to go in, ת‎ therefore being the feminine termination, as in bint daughter, and the original form baʾtu, bātu (entrance) is preserved in the plural bāttim where the tt is to be explained as due to the analogy of trisyllabic stems. In the singular bāt passed into bēt (?), and this was resolved into bait, as Yerūšālēm into Yerūšālayim.
  6. Cf. Nöldeke, Beitröge, p. 58, yaum, probably an extension of a biliteral word which has survived in יָמִים‎, יְמֵי‎. Barth, however, Orient. Studien, p. 791 (see above on אִשָּׂה‎), sees in יָמִים‎, יְמֵי‎, יְמוֹת‎ new formations in Hebrew, caused by the naturally close connexion and association of these plurals with שְׁנִים‎, שְׁנֵי‎, שְׁנוֹת‎ years, to which they became assimilated in form. The view that יוֹם‎ is merely an incorrect obscuring of יָם‎, and therefore distinct from the Arab. yaum, is contradicted by the invariable spelling יוֹם‎, &c., notwithstanding the spelling ובים‎ (=וּבְיֹם‎ ?) in the Siloam inscription, line 3 (cf. §7f), and מִיֹּמָ֑יִם‎ Hosea 6:2. Cf. also the note on §100g.
adsFree icon
Ads FreeProfile