Acts 11:2

Syriac Peshitta (NT Only)

ܘܟ݂ܰܕ݂ ܣܠܶܩ ܫܶܡܥܽܘܢ ܠܽܐܘܪܺܫܠܶܡ ܕ݁ܳܝܢܺܝܢ ܗ݈ܘܰܘ ܥܰܡܶܗ ܗܳܢܽܘܢ ܕ݁ܡܶܢ ܓ݁ܙܽܘܪܬ݁ܳܐ ܀

Bible Verse Review
  from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge

they: Acts 10:9, Acts 10:45, Acts 15:1, Acts 15:5, Acts 21:20-23, Galatians 2:12-14

Reciprocal: Joshua 22:12 - the whole Joshua 22:22 - Israel 1 Samuel 17:29 - General Matthew 20:11 - they murmured Acts 10:28 - that it Colossians 4:11 - who 1 Thessalonians 2:16 - Forbidding

Gill's Notes on the Bible

And when Peter was come up to Jerusalem,.... From Caesarea, after he had stayed some certain days in Cornelius's house; so a journey from Caesarea to Jerusalem is called an ascending from the one to the other, Acts 25:1 because Jerusalem stood on higher ground, as well as was the metropolis of the country; and this was a journey of six hundred furlongs, or seventy five miles, for so far, according to Josephus t, was Caesarea distant from Jerusalem:

they that were of the circumcision, which phrase designs not only the circumcised Jews that believed in Christ, for such were all they of the church at Jerusalem, or at least proselytes that had been circumcised, for as yet there were no uncircumcised Gentiles among them; but those of them, who were most strenuous for circumcision, and made it not only a bar of church communion, but even of civil conversation:

these contended with him; litigated the point, disputed the matter with him, complained against him, and quarrelled with him. Epiphanius says u, that Cerinthus, that arch-heretic, was at the head of this contention.

t De Bello Jud. l. 1. c. 3. sect. 5. u Contr. Haeres. l. 1. Haeres. 28.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible

They that were of the circumcision - Christians who had been converted from among the Jews.

Contended with him - Disputed; reproved him; charged him with being in fault. This is one of the circumstances which show conclusively that the apostles and early Christians did not regard Peter as having any particular supremacy over the church, or as being in any special sense the vicar of Christ upon earth. If he had been regarded as having the authority which the Roman Catholics claim for him, they would have submitted at once to what he had thought proper to do. But the earliest Christians had no such idea of Peter’s so-called authority. This claim for Peter is not only opposed to this place, but to every part of the New Testament.

Clarke's Notes on the Bible

Verse Acts 11:2. Contended with him — A manifest proof this that the primitive Church at Jerusalem (and no Church can ever deserve this name but the Jerusalem Church) had no conception of St. Peter's supremacy, or of his being prince of the apostles. He is now called to account for his conduct, which they judged to be reprehensible; and which they would not have attempted to do had they believed him to be Christ's vicar upon earth, and the infallible Head of the Church. But this absurd dream is every where refuted in the New Testament.