希伯来书 8:7

Chinese NCV (Simplified)

如果頭一個約沒有缺點，就沒有尋求另一個約的必要了。

Parallel Translations

Chinese Union (Simplified)
那 前 约 若 没 有 瑕 疵 ， 就 无 处 寻 求 後 约 了 。

Contextual Overview

⁶ But the priestly work that has been given to Jesus is much greater than the work that was given to the other priests. In the same way, the new agreement that Jesus brought from God to his people is much greater than the old one. And the new agreement is based on promises of better things. ⁷ If there had been nothing wrong with the first agreement, there would have been no need for a second agreement. ⁸ But God found something wrong with his people. He says: "Look, the time is coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new agreement with the people of Israel and the people of Judah. ⁹ It will not be like the agreement I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to bring them out of Egypt. But they broke that agreement, and I turned away from them, says the Lord. ¹⁰ This is the agreement I will make with the people of Israel at that time, says the Lord. I will put my teachings in their minds and write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. ¹¹ People will no longer have to teach their neighbors and relatives to know the Lord, because all people will know me, from the least to the most important. ¹² I will forgive them for the wicked things they did, and I will not remember their sins anymore." Jeremiah 31:31–34 ¹³ God called this a new agreement, so he has made the first agreement old. And anything that is old and worn out is ready to disappear.

Bible Verse Review
  from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge

had: Hebrews 8:6, Hebrews 7:11, Hebrews 7:18, Galatians 3:21

Reciprocal: Deuteronomy 29:14 - General Hebrews 9:1 - the first Hebrews 9:15 - the first Hebrews 9:18 - the first Hebrews 10:9 - He taketh

Cross-References

Leviticus 11:15
any kind of raven,

1 Kings 17:4
You may drink from the stream, and I have commanded ravens to bring you food there."

1 Kings 17:6
The birds brought Elijah bread and meat every morning and evening, and he drank water from the stream.

Job 38:41
Who gives food to the birds when their young cry out to God and wander about without food?

Psalms 147:9
He gives food to cattle and to the little birds that call.

Gill's Notes on the Bible

For if that first covenant had been faultless,.... Not the covenant of works; that was made in paradise, this on Mount Sinai; that was made with Adam and his posterity, this with the Jews only; that had no mediator, this had one, Moses; that was not dedicated with blood, this was; that had no forgiveness of sin in it, this had; under that saints are not, but they were under this; to be under that was no privilege, but to be under this it was, as to the Israelites, who on this account were preferable to all other nations: nor is the pure covenant of grace as administered under the Gospel, meant; for though that was first made, yet is the second in administration; that includes the elect of God among the Gentiles, this only the Jews; that is made only with them, and is made known to them whom God calls by his grace in time, this was made with good and bad; that was of pure grace, this required works in order to life and the enjoyment of its blessings; that is an everlasting covenant, this is done away; and the one is manifestly distinguished from the other in this chapter: but the covenant here designed is the covenant of grace, as administered under the legal dispensation, and which was a typical one; the people with whom it was made were typical of the true Israel of God; the blessings promised in it were shadows of good things to come; the works it required were typical of Christ's obedience to the law, in the room and stead of his people, by which he fulfilled it; the sacrifices on which it was established were types of the sacrifice and death of Christ; the mediator of it. Moses, was a type of Christ, the Mediator of the new covenant; and it was confirmed by the blood of beasts, which was typical of the blood of Christ: this covenant was not "faultless", but was faulty or blameworthy; not that there was anything sinful and criminal in it, but it was deficient; there was a weakness in it; its sacrifices could not make men perfect, nor take away sin; there wanted a larger supply of the grace of the Spirit to write the law of God upon the heart, and to enable men to keep it; there was not in it so full a revelation of the mind and will of God, and of his love and grace, as has since been made; nor did it exhibit a free and full pardon for all sins, unclogged of every condition; the persons that were under it were faulty; hence it follows, that God found fault with them, they could not answer the requirements and end of it: had it been faultless,

then should no place have been sought for the second; the covenant of grace unveiled in the Gospel dispensation, called the better testament, the better covenant, and the new covenant; in order to, introduce which, the first was removed, that this might succeed it; just as because there was no perfection by the Levitical priesthood, it became necessary that another priest should arise, of another order.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible

For if that first covenant had been faultless - see the note on Hebrews 7:11. It is implied here that God had said that that covenant was not perfect or faultless. The meaning is not that that first covenant made under Moses had any real faults - or inculcated what was wrong, but that it did not contain the ample provision for the pardon of sin and the salvation of the soul which was desirable. It was merely “preparatory” to the gospel.

Then should no place have been sought for the second - There could not have been - inasmuch as in that case it would have been impossible to have bettered it, and any change would have been only for the worse.

Clarke's Notes on the Bible

Verse Hebrews 8:7. If that first had been faultless — This is nearly the same argument with that in Hebrews 7:11. The simple meaning is: If the first covenant had made a provision for and actually conferred pardon and purity, and given a title to eternal life, then there could have been no need for a second; but the first covenant did not give these things, therefore a second was necessary; and the covenant that gives these things is the Christian covenant.