the Week of Proper 10 / Ordinary 15
free while helping to build churches and support pastors in Uganda.
Click here to learn more!
Read the Bible
Brenton's Septuagint
Deuteronomy 14:14
Bible Study Resources
Concordances:
- Nave'sDictionaries:
- AmericanEncyclopedias:
- CondensedParallel Translations
every kind of raven,
and every orev after its kind,
And every raven after his kind,
and any kind of crow according to its kind,
every raven of any kind;
any kind of raven,
every raven after its species,
and every raven of any variety,
and every raven in its kind,
Nor all kinde of rauens,
and every raven in its kind,
any kind of raven,
and every raven after its kind;
any kind of raven,
The owl, the pelican, the crow,
and all ravens by their kinds;
& all Rauens in their kynde,
and every raven after its kind,
Every raven, and all birds of that sort;
And all kinde of Rauens.
and every raven after its kinds;
And euery rauen after his kinde,
and every raven after its kind;
any kind of raven,
and al thing of rauenys kynde,
and every raven after its kind;
and every raven after its kind,
And every raven after his kind,
and every raven after its kind,
every raven after its kind;
ravens of all kinds,
every kind of raven,
every raven of any kind;
and every raven after its kind;
And all of the raven’s kind:
every raven after its kind;
and every raven in its kind,
Contextual Overview
Bible Verse Review
from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge
Cross-References
And Abram took Sara his wife, and Lot the son of his brother, and all their possessions, as many as they had got, and every soul which they had got in Charrhan, and they went forth to go into the land of Chanaan.
And they treated Abram well on her account, and he had sheep, and calves, and asses, and men-servants, and women-servants, and mules, and camels.
And Abram said to Lot, Let there not be a strife between me and thee, and between my herdmen and thy herdmen, for we are brethren.
And it came to pass in the reign of Amarphal king of Sennaar, and Arioch king of Ellasar, that Chodollogomor king of Elam, and Thargal king of nations,
made war with Balla king of Sodom, and with Barsa king of Gomorrha, and with Sennaar, king of Adama, and with Symobor king of Seboim and the king of Balac, this is Segor.
All these met with one consent at the salt valley; this is now the sea of salt.
And in the fourteenth year came Chodollogomor, and the kings with him, and cut to pieces the giants in Astaroth, and Carnain, and strong nations with them, and the Ommaeans in the city Save.
And they took all the cavalry of Sodom and Gomorrha, and all their provisions, and departed.
And they took also Lot the son of Abrams brother, and his baggage, and departed, for he dwelt in Sodom.
And Abram said, I am grieved since thou hast given me no seed, but my home-born servant shall succeed me.
Gill's Notes on the Bible
:-
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Compare Leviticus 11:0. The variations here, whether omissions or additions, are probably to be explained by the time and circumstances of the speaker.
Deuteronomy 14:5
The âpygargâ is a species of gazelle, and the âwild oxâ and âchamoisâ are swift types of antelope.
Deuteronomy 14:21
The prohibition is repeated from Leviticus 22:8. The directions as to the disposal of the carcass are unique to Deuteronomy, and their motive is clear. To have forbidden the people either themselves to eat that which had died, or to allow any others to do so, would have involved loss of property, and consequent temptation to an infraction of the command. The permissions now for the first time granted would have been useless in the wilderness. During the 40 yearsâ wandering there could be but little opportunity of selling such carcasses; while non-Israelites living in the camp would in such a matter be bound by the same rules as the Israelites Leviticus 17:15; Leviticus 24:22. Further, it would seem (compare Leviticus 17:15) that greater stringency is here given to the requirement of abstinence from that which had died of itself. Probably on this, as on so many other points, allowance was made for the circumstances of the people. Flesh meat was no doubt often scarce in the desert. It would therefore have been a hardship to forbid entirely the use of that which had not been killed. However, now that the plenty of the promised land was before them, the modified toleration of this unholy food was withdrawn.