the Third Week after Easter
Click here to join the effort!
Read the Bible
Easy-to-Read Version
Exodus 22:12
Bible Study Resources
Concordances:
- Nave'sDictionaries:
- AmericanEncyclopedias:
- InternationalParallel Translations
But if it is stolen from him, he shall make restitution to the owner of it.
And if it be stolen from him, he shall make restitution unto the owner thereof.
But if indeed it was stolen from him, he will make restitution to its owner.
But if the animal was stolen from the neighbor, he must pay the owner for it.
But if it was stolen from him, he will pay its owner.
"But if it is actually stolen from him [when in his care], he shall make restitution to its owner.
"But if it is actually stolen from him, he shall make restitution to its owner.
But if it be stollen fro him, he shal make restitution vnto the owner thereof.
But if it is actually stolen from him, he shall make restitution to its owner.
But if the animal was stolen while in your care, you must replace it.
If it was torn to pieces by an animal, the neighbor must bring it as evidence, and then he doesn't need to make good the loss.
But if it have been stolen from him, he shall make [it] good unto its owner.
But if it is stolen from him, he shall make restitution to its owner.
But if it is stolen from him, he shall make restitution to the owner thereof.
but if the animal was stolen, the man must repay the owner.
But if, in fact, the animal was stolen from his custody, he must make restitution to its owner.
And if it is indeed stolen from him, he shall repay to its owner.
Yf a thefe steale it from him, then shal he make restitucio vnto the owner therof.
But if it be stolen from him, he shall make restitution unto the owner thereof.
But if it is taken from him by a thief, he is to make up for the loss of it to its owner.
And if it be stollen from hym, then he shall make restitution vnto the owner therof.
If it be torn in pieces, let him bring it for witness; he shall not make good that which was torn.
And if it be stollen from him, he shall make restitution vnto the owner thereof.
And if it be stolen from him, he shall make compensation to the owner.
But if it be stolen from him, he shall make restitution unto the owner thereof.
But if the animal was actually stolen from the neighbor, he must make restitution to the owner.
That if it is takun awei bi thefte, he schal restore the harm to the lord;
but if it is certainly stolen from him, he doth repay to its owner;
But if it is stolen from him, he shall make restitution to the owner thereof.
And if it shall be stolen from him, he shall make restitution to the owner of it.
But if it is stolen from him, he shall make restitution to the owner of it.
But if, in fact, it is stolen from him, he shall make restitution to the owner of it.
But if the animal was indeed stolen, the guilty person must pay compensation to the owner.
But if it is stolen from him, he will pay the owner for the loss.
But if it was stolen, restitution shall be made to its owner.
But, if it be verily stolen, from him, he shall make restitution to the owner thereof.
But if it were taken away by stealth, he shall make the loss good to the owner.
But if it is stolen from him, he shall make restitution to its owner.
"But if it is actually stolen from him, he shall make restitution to its owner.
Contextual Overview
Bible Verse Review
from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge
stolen from him: Exodus 22:7, Genesis 31:39
Reciprocal: Exodus 22:5 - shall he make restitution Exodus 22:6 - he that kindled the fire
Cross-References
Then Abraham said, "I thought no one in this place respected God. I thought someone would kill me to get Sarah.
Then God said, "Take your son to the land of Moriah and kill your son there as a sacrifice for me. This must be Isaac, your only son, the one you love. Use him as a burnt offering on one of the mountains there. I will tell you which mountain."
Abraham took the wood for the sacrifice and put it on his son's shoulder. Abraham took the special knife and fire. Then both he and his son went together to the place for worship.
Abraham answered, "God himself is providing the lamb for the sacrifice, my son." So both Abraham and his son went together to that place.
When they came to the place where God told them to go, Abraham built an altar. He carefully laid the wood on the altar. Then he tied up his son Isaac and laid him on the altar on top of the wood.
Then Abraham reached for his knife to kill his son.
The angel said, "Don't kill your son or hurt him in any way. Now I can see that you do respect and obey God. I see that you are ready to kill your son, your only son, for me."
Then Abraham noticed a ram whose horns were caught in a bush. So Abraham went and took the ram. He offered it, instead of his son, as a sacrifice to God.
The first son is Uz. The second son is Buz. The third son is Kemuel, the father of Aram.
Then there are Kesed, Hazo, Pildash, Jidlaph, and Bethuel."
Gill's Notes on the Bible
And if it be stolen from him,.... Or "but if" x it was taken away by theft; and that "from with him" y, as it may be literally rendered, from among his own cattle, and they not taken; and he being present, pretending to have an eye upon them and keep them, but was careless and negligent, at least, if he did not connive at the theft:
he shall make restitution to the owner thereof; for in such a case there was ground for suspicion of fraud; however, there was apparent carelessness, and it was but just he should make restitution, since he had hire or wages for keeping it; which is the reason Aben Ezra gives for it, and is suggested by the Targum of Jonathan; which adds to the former clause, by way of explanation,
"that which was with him to be kept for a reward.''
x כי אם "si autem", Drusius. y מעמו "e cum eo", Montanus.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
This law appears to relate chiefly to herdsmen employed by the owners of cattle. When an animal was stolen Exodus 22:12, it was presumed either that the herdsman might have prevented it, or that he could find the thief and bring him to justice (see Exodus 22:4). When an animal was killed by a wild beast, the keeper had to produce the mangled carcass, not only in proof of the fact, but to show that he had, by his vigilance and courage, deprived the wild beast of its prey.