the Week of Proper 8 / Ordinary 13
Click here to join the effort!
Read the Bible
New American Standard Bible
Proverbs 28:21
Bible Study Resources
Concordances:
- Nave'sDictionaries:
- AmericanEncyclopedias:
- InternationalParallel Translations
It is not good to show partiality—yet even a courageous person may sin for a piece of bread.
To show partiality is not good; Yet a man will do wrong for a piece of bread.
To have respect of persons is not good: for for a piece of bread that man will transgress.
To show partiality is not good, but for a piece of bread a man will do wrong.
It is not good for a judge to take sides, but some will sin for only a piece of bread.
To have regard for one person over another and to show favoritism is not good, Because for a piece of bread a man will transgress.
To show partiality is not good; Yet a man will do wrong for a piece of bread.
To haue respect of persons is not good: for that man will transgresse for a piece of bread.
To show partiality is not good,Even for a piece of bread a man will transgress.
To show partiality is not good, because a man may sin for a piece of bread.
It isn't right to be unfair, but some people can be bribed with only a piece of bread.
To show partiality is not good, though a person may do wrong for a crust of bread.
To have respect of persons is not good; but for a piece of bread will a man transgress.
It is wrong for a judge to support someone simply because he knows them. But some judges will change their decisions for the price of a loaf of bread.
A man who shows partiality is not good; for a piece of bread a man will become a traitor.
Prejudice is wrong. But some judges will do wrong to get even the smallest bribe.
Showing partiality is not good, and over a morsel of bread, a strong man will do wrong.
To respect faces is not good, yea, for a man will transgress for a piece of bread.
To haue respecte of personnes in iudgment is not good: And why? he will do wronge, yee euen for a pece of bred.
To have respect of persons is not good; Neither that a man should transgress for a piece of bread.
It is not good to have respect for a man's position: for a man will do wrong for a bit of bread.
To have respect of persons is not good; for a man will transgress for a piece of bread.
To haue respect of persons, is not good: for, for a piece of bread that man will transgresse.
To haue respect of persons [in iudgement] is not good, for that man wyll do wrong, yea euen for a peece of bread.
A hearth for coals, and wood for fire; and railing man for the tumult of strife.
To have respect of persons is not good: neither that a man should transgress for a piece of bread.
He that knowith a face in doom, doith not wel; this man forsakith treuthe, yhe, for a mussel of breed.
To have respect of persons is not good; Neither that a [noble] man should transgress for a piece of bread.
To have respect of persons [is] not good: for, for a piece of bread [that] man will transgress.
To show partiality is terrible, for a person will transgress over the smallest piece of bread.
To show partiality is not good, Because for a piece of bread a man will transgress.
Showing partiality is never good, yet some will do wrong for a mere piece of bread.
To show favor is not good, because a man will sin for a piece of bread.
To show partiality is not good— yet for a piece of bread a person may do wrong.
To take note of faces in judgment , is not good, and, for a bit of bread, a man will transgress.
He that hath respect to a person in judgment, doth not well: such a man even for a morsel of bread forsaketh the truth.
To show partiality is not good; but for a piece of bread a man will do wrong.
To discern faces is not good, And for a piece of bread doth a man transgress.
Playing favorites is always a bad thing; you can do great harm in seemingly harmless ways.
To show partiality is not good, Because for a piece of bread a man will transgress.
Contextual Overview
Bible Verse Review
from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge
respect: Proverbs 18:5, Proverbs 24:23, Exodus 23:2, Exodus 23:8
for: Erasmus observes that this expression probably originated from the circumstance of holding out a piece of bread to a dog, in order to soothe him. Ezekiel 13:19, Hosea 4:18, Micah 3:5, Micah 7:3, Romans 16:18, 2 Peter 2:3
Reciprocal: Judges 18:4 - hired me Isaiah 29:21 - and turn Amos 2:7 - pant Mark 14:11 - and promised James 2:1 - with
Cross-References
"The LORD is my strength and song, And He has become my salvation; This is my God, and I will praise Him; My father's God, and I will exalt Him.
"Today you have declared the LORD to be your God, and that you will walk in His ways and keep His statutes, His commandments, and His ordinances, and listen to His voice.
then whatever comes out the doors of my house to meet me when I return safely from the sons of Ammon, it shall be the LORD'S, and I will offer it up as a burnt offering."
"For your servant made a vow while I was living in Geshur in Aram, saying, 'If the LORD will indeed bring me back to Jerusalem, then I will serve the LORD.'"
Then Mephibosheth the grandson of Saul came down to meet the king; but he had neither tended to his feet, nor trimmed his mustache, nor washed his clothes since the day the king departed until the day he came home in peace.
And Mephibosheth said to the king, "Let him even take it all, since my lord the king has come safely to his own house."
Then Naaman said, "If not, please let your servant be given two mules' load of earth; for your servant will no longer offer a burnt offering nor a sacrifice to other gods, but to the LORD.
Gill's Notes on the Bible
To have respect of persons [is] not good, c, In courts of judicature, to give a cause or pass sentence in favour of a person, because he is rich, or is a relation, a friend, an acquaintance, or has done a kindness and against another, because of the reverse, Leviticus 19:15; nor in religious assemblies, making a difference between the rich and the poor, James 2:1; this is not good in itself, nor productive of good effects, and cannot be well pleasing to God, who himself is no respecter of persons;
for for a piece of bread [that] man will transgress; the laws of God and men; having used himself to such unrighteous methods of proceeding, he will do any base action for a small gain, he will stick at nothing, and do it for anything; as Cato used to say of M. Coelius the tribune,
"that he might be hired, for a morsel of bread, to speak or hold his peace;''
see Ezekiel 13:19.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Dishonest partiality leads men who have enslaved themselves to it to transgress, even when the inducement is altogether disproportionate. A âpiece of breadâ was proverbial at all times as the most extreme point of poverty (compare the marginal reference).