the Third Week after Easter
Click here to learn more!
Read the Bible
Wycliffe Bible
2 Kings 12:6
Bible Study Resources
Concordances:
- Nave'sDictionaries:
- BridgewayEncyclopedias:
- CondensedParallel Translations
But by the twenty-third year of the reign of King Joash, the priests had not repaired the damage to the temple.
But it was so, that in the three and twentieth year of king Yeho'ash the Kohanim had not repaired the breaches of the house.
But it was so, that in the three and twentieth year of king Jehoash the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.
But by the twenty-third year of King Jehoash, the priests had made no repairs on the house.
But by the twenty-third year Joash was king, the priests still had not repaired the Temple.
By the twenty-third year of King Jehoash's reign the priests had still not repaired the damage to the temple.
But it came about in the twenty-third year of [the reign of] King Jehoash, that the priests still had not repaired the damages of the LORD'S house.
But it came about that in the twenty-third year of King Jehoash, the priests had not repaired any damage to the house.
Yet in the three and twentieth yeere of King Iehoash the Priestes had not mended that which was decayed in the Temple.
Now it happened that in the twenty-third year of King Jehoash the priests had not repaired the damages of the house.
But the priests never started repairing the temple. So in the twenty-third year of his rule,
the cohanim are to receive from whoever personally makes contributions to them; and they are to use these funds to repair the damaged parts of the house, wherever damage is found.
And it was [so that] in the twenty-third year of king Jehoash, the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.
In the 23rd year that Joash was king, the priests still had not repaired the Temple,
But it was so, that even in the twenty-third year of King Joash the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.
But by the twenty-third year of Joash's reign the priests still had not made any repairs in the Temple.
It happened in the twenty-third year of King Jehoash that the priests had not repaired the damage in the temple.
And it happened, in the twenty third year of King Joash, that the priests had not repaired the breach of the house.
But whan ye prestes repayred not the decaye in the house vnto the thre and twetieth yeare of kynge Ioas,
But it was so, that in the three and twentieth year of king Jehoash the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.
But in the twenty-third year of King Jehoash, the priests had not made good the damaged parts of the house.
And so it came to passe, that vnto the three and twentith yere of king Iehoas, the priestes had mended nothing that was decayed in the temple.
let the priests take it to them, every man from him that bestoweth it upon him; and they shall repair the breaches of the house, wheresoever any breach shall be found.'
But it was so that in the three and twentieth yeere of king Iehoash, the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.
And it came to pass in the twenty-third year of king Joas the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.
But it was so, that in the three and twentieth year of king Jehoash the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.
But by the twenty-third year of the reign of Joash, the priests had not repaired the damage to the temple.
And it cometh to pass, in the twenty and third year of king Jehoash, the priests have not strengthened the breach of the house,
But it was so, that in the three and twentieth year of king Jehoash the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.
But it was [so], [that] in the three and twentieth year of king Jehoash the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.
But it was so, that in the three and twentieth year of king Jehoash the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.
Now it was so, by the twenty-third year of King Jehoash, that the priests had not repaired the damages of the temple.
But by the twenty-third year of Joash's reign, the priests still had not repaired the Temple.
But by the twenty-third year of King Joash, the religious leaders had not put together the broken places of the house.
But by the twenty-third year of King Jehoash the priests had made no repairs on the house.
But it came to pass, that, in the twenty-third year of King Jehoash, the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.
Now till the three and twentieth year of king Joas the priests did not make the repairs of the temple.
But by the twenty-third year of King Jeho'ash the priests had made no repairs on the house.
But by the twenty-third year of Joash's rule, the priests hadn't done one thing—The Temple was as dilapidated as ever.
But it came about that in the twenty-third year of King Jehoash the priests had not repaired the damages of the house.
Contextual Overview
Bible Verse Review
from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge
three and twentieth year: Heb. twentieth year and third year
the priests: 1 Samuel 2:29, 1 Samuel 2:30, 2 Chronicles 29:34, Isaiah 56:10-12, Malachi 1:10, Philippians 2:21, 1 Peter 5:2
Reciprocal: 2 Chronicles 24:5 - Howbeit
Cross-References
Forsothe Chanaan gendride Sidon, his firste gendride sone, Ethei, and Jebusei,
And Farao clepide Abram, and seide to hym, What is it that thou hast do to me? whi schewidist thou not to me, that sche was thi wijf?
for what cause seidist thou, that sche was thi sister, that Y schulde take hir in to wife to me? Now therfor lo! thi wiif; take thou hir, and go.
Wherfor also strijf was maad bitwixe the keperis of flockis of Abram and of Loth. Forsothe Chananei and Feresei dwelliden in that lond in that tyme.
And Jacob passide in to Salem, a citee of Sichimis, whiche is in the lond of Canaan, aftir that he turnede ayen fro Mesopotanye of Sirie, and he dwellide besidis the citee.
And whanne Sichem, the sone of Emor Euey, the prince of that lond, hadde seyn hir, he louede hir, and rauyschide, and sclepte with hir, and oppresside the virgyn bi violence.
Therfor thei yauen to hym alle alien goddis which thei hadden, and eere ryngis, that weren in `the eeris of hem; and he deluyde tho vndur a `tre, clepid therubynte, which is bihynde the citee of Sichem.
aftir the weie that goith to the goyng doun of the sunne, in the lond of Cananey, that dwellith in the feeldi places ayens Galgala, which is bisidis the valey goynge and entrynge fer.
And thei ordeyneden Cedes in Galilee, of the hil of Neptalym, and Sichem in the hil of Effraym, and Cariatharbe, thilke is Ebron, in the hil of Juda.
Also `the sones of Israel birieden the boonys of Joseph, whiche thei baren fro Egipt in Sichen, in the part of the feeld, which feeld Jacob bouyte of the sones of Emor, fadir of Sichen, for an hundrid yonge scheep; and it was in to possessioun of the sones of Joseph.
Gill's Notes on the Bible
But it was so, that in the twenty and third year of King Jehoash, the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house. Either the people being backward to pay in the money, or the priests converted it to their own use: or, however, were negligent of doing the work enjoined them by the king, either in collecting the money, or in using it as they were directed.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
No money had for some time been brought in (marginal reference āgā). Perhaps it was difficult for the priests and Levites to know exactly what proportion of the money paid to them was fairly applicable to the temple service and to their own support; and what, consequently, was the balance which they ought to apply to the repairs.
Clarke's Notes on the Bible
Verse 2 Kings 12:6. In the three and twentieth year — In what year Jehoash gave the orders for these repairs, we cannot tell; but the account here plainly intimates that they had been long given, and that nothing was done, merely through the inactivity and negligence of the priests; see 2 Chronicles 24:6.
It seems that the people had brought money in abundance, and the pious Jehoiada was over the priests, and yet nothing was done! Though Jehoiada was a good man, he does not appear to have had much of the spirit of an active zeal; and simple piety, without zeal and activity, is of little use when a reformation in religion and manners is necessary to be brought about. Philip Melancthon was orthodox, pious, and learned, but he was a man of comparative inactivity. In many respects Martin Luther was by far his inferior, but in zeal and activity he was a flaming and consuming fire; and by him, under God, was the mighty Reformation, from the corruptions of popery, effected. Ten thousand Jehoiadas and Melancthons might have wished it in vain; Luther worked, and God worked by him, in him, and for him.