5 Mose 14:7

Schlachter Bibel

Doch sollt ihr diese nicht essen von den Wiederkäuern und von denen, die durchgespaltene Hufe haben: das Kamel, den Hasen und den Springhasen; denn wiewohl sie wiederkäuen, haben sie doch nicht durchgespaltene Klauen; sie sollen euch unrein sein.

Parallel Translations

Elberfelder Bibel (1905)
Nur diese sollt ihr nicht essen von den wiederk�uenden und von denen, die mit gespaltenen Hufen versehen sind: Das Kamel und den Hasen und den Klippendachs; denn sie wiederk�uen, aber sie haben keine gespaltene Hufe: Unrein sollen sie euch sein;

Lutherbible (1912)
Das sollt ihr aber nicht essen von dem, das wiederkäut, und von dem, das die Klauen spaltet: das Kamel, der Hase und Kaninchen, die wiederkäuen und doch ihre Klauen nicht spalten, sollen euch unrein sein;

Bible Verse Review
  from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge

Matthew 7:22, Matthew 7:23, Matthew 7:26, 2 Timothy 3:5, Titus 1:16, 2 Peter 2:18-22

Reciprocal: Leviticus 7:21 - any unclean Leviticus 11:6 - the hare Psalms 104:18 - the conies Ezekiel 8:10 - every

Gill's Notes on the Bible

:-

(The "hare" is this verse may be an animal that is now is extinct but was alive at the time of Moses. It is only other mentioned in Leviticus 11:6,

Leviticus 11:6- :. Editor.)

Barnes' Notes on the Bible

Compare Leviticus 11:0. The variations here, whether omissions or additions, are probably to be explained by the time and circumstances of the speaker.

Deuteronomy 14:5

The “pygarg” is a species of gazelle, and the “wild ox” and “chamois” are swift types of antelope.

Deuteronomy 14:21

The prohibition is repeated from Leviticus 22:8. The directions as to the disposal of the carcass are unique to Deuteronomy, and their motive is clear. To have forbidden the people either themselves to eat that which had died, or to allow any others to do so, would have involved loss of property, and consequent temptation to an infraction of the command. The permissions now for the first time granted would have been useless in the wilderness. During the 40 years’ wandering there could be but little opportunity of selling such carcasses; while non-Israelites living in the camp would in such a matter be bound by the same rules as the Israelites Leviticus 17:15; Leviticus 24:22. Further, it would seem (compare Leviticus 17:15) that greater stringency is here given to the requirement of abstinence from that which had died of itself. Probably on this, as on so many other points, allowance was made for the circumstances of the people. Flesh meat was no doubt often scarce in the desert. It would therefore have been a hardship to forbid entirely the use of that which had not been killed. However, now that the plenty of the promised land was before them, the modified toleration of this unholy food was withdrawn.