secundum Matthæum 22:42

Clementine Latin Vulgate

dicens : Pater, si vis, transfer calicem istum a me : verumtamen non mea voluntas, sed tua fiat.

Parallel Translations

Jerome's Latin Vulgate (405)
dicens: Pater, si vis, transfer calicem istum a me: verumtamen non mea voluntas, sed tua fiat.

Nova Vulgata (1979)
dicens: "Pater, si vis, transfer calicem istum a me; verumtamen non mea voluntas sed tua fiat".

Bible Verse Review
  from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge

Father: Matthew 26:42, Matthew 26:44, Mark 14:36, John 12:27, John 12:28

willing, remove: Gr. willing to remove

cup: Luke 22:17-20, Isaiah 51:17, Isaiah 51:22, Jeremiah 25:15, Matthew 20:22, John 18:11

not: Psalms 40:8, John 4:34, John 5:30, John 6:38, Hebrews 10:7-10

Reciprocal: Matthew 26:39 - and prayed Mark 10:38 - drink of the Acts 21:14 - The will Romans 8:15 - Abba Galatians 1:4 - according Hebrews 5:7 - in that he feared

Gill's Notes on the Bible

Saying, Father, if thou be willing,.... If it be consistent with thy will of saving sinners, and which thou hast declared to me, and I have undertook to perform: the other evangelists say, "if it be possible"; :-

remove this cup from me; meaning, either his present sorrows and distress, or his approaching sufferings and death, which he had in view, or both:

nevertheless not my will; as man, for Christ had an human will distinct from, though not contrary to his divine will:

but thine be done; which Christ undertook, and came into this world to do; and it was his meat and drink to do it, and was the same with his own will, as the Son of God; :-, and

:-.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible

See the Matthew 26:30-46 notes; Mark 14:26-42 notes.

Luke 22:43

Strengthening him - His human nature, to sustain the great burden that was upon his soul. Some have supposed from this that he was not divine as well as human; for if he was “God,” how could an angel give any strength or comfort? and why did not the divine nature “alone” sustain the human? But the fact that he was “divine” does not affect the case at all. It might be asked with the same propriety, If he was, as all admit, the friend of God, and beloved of God, and holy, why, if he was a mere man, did not “God” sustain him alone, without an angel’s intervening? But the objection in neither case would have any force. The “man, Christ Jesus,” was suffering. His human nature was in agony, and it is the “manner” of God to sustain the afflicted by the intervention of others; nor was there any more “unfitness” in sustaining the human nature of his Son in this manner than any other sufferer.

Luke 22:44

In an agony - See this verse explained in the notes at Matthew 26:42-44.

Luke 22:45

Sleeping for sorrow - On account of the greatness of their sorrow. See the notes at Matthew 26:40.