Lectionary Calendar
Thursday, May 30th, 2024
the Week of Proper 3 / Ordinary 8
For 10¢ a day you can enjoy StudyLight.org ads
free while helping to build churches and support pastors in Uganda.
Click here to learn more!

Bible Commentaries
1 Samuel

Peake's Commentary on the BiblePeake's Commentary

- 1 Samuel

by Arthur Peake



Title. Our two Books of Samuel are the first and second parts of what was originally a single book in the Heb. In LXX the books are called 1 and 2 Kingdoms.

Composition.— The history of the book is very similar to that of the Hex. and Jg.; indeed it is sometimes thought that the books Gen.– Jg. and Samuel were compiled from the same sources, by the same literary process, and by the same series of editors. The reader should supplement the brief statement here by a careful study of the account of the methods of historical composition in Israel given in the previous commentaries and articles.

Samuel includes material from the period before the publication of Dt. in 1 Samuel 6:21; material written under the influence of Dt.; and later material. The pre-Dt. material included three groups of sections:

(A) Sections often regarded as similar in character to the Pentateuchal material, J. The symbol (J) is used here for these sections, not as asserting their identity with the Hex. source, but as a recognition of the similarity between the two sets of material. This (J) includes a History of Saul and a History of David. These may be merely parts of the same work; or on the other hand, the (J) material concerning each of the two kings may be derived from two or more sources.

(B) Sections similar to the Pentateuchal E; these are denoted here by (E); cf. previous paragraph. These include a fragment of a History of the Ark, and material from a History or Histories of Saul and David.

(C) Sections similar to the later additions to the Pentateuchal source E; these sections are denoted here by the symbol (E 2 ); cf. above. They include a History of Samuel, and perhaps material from other sources. (E 2 ) was compiled about the same time as the publication of Dt. Some sections given to (E 2 ) here are sometimes regarded as Deuteronomic.

The Deuteronomic material is denoted by (D); and the later material by (R).

The general history of the book is as follows: During the early Monarchy, various accounts were written of the times of Samuel, Saul, and David; the material ascribed to (J) and (E) is derived from these accounts. Later on, especially towards the close of the Monarchy, other narratives were written and supplements were added to the earlier works. The material ascribed to (E 2 ) was derived from these accounts.

Also towards the close of the Monarchy, an editor, corresponding to the Pentateuchal R, made a compilation from (J), (E), (E 2 ), which may be described as a first edition of the Book of Samuel. During or after the Exile, scholars writing under the influence of Dt. revised this first edition, thus producing the second or Deuteronomic edition; the additions made by these scholars are denoted by (D). There was further revision later on by other editors and scribes; the additions made by them are denoted by (R). They gave the book its present form. Some, however, regard the Deuteronomic as the first edition; or otherwise vary somewhat the above scheme.

For the sake of simplicity we have given a very rough and approximate statement, omitting many details, qualifications, and possible alternatives. The theories and ascertained facts as given in the standard commentaries are detailed, various, and complicated; if we could fully determine the actual facts, they would probably turn out to be more complicated still.

We have tried to indicate that it is often difficult to decide how and how far the different sections are connected with each other; whether, for instance, 1 Samuel 19:11-17 is the sequel of 1 Samuel 18:27 or of 1 Samuel 19:10, or is not connected with either of them. There are, however, groups of sections where there is clearly a connected sequence; we do not take into account minor additions. The more important of these groups are:

The Early Life of Samuel ( 1 Samuel 1:1-28; 1 Samuel 2:11-26; 1 Samuel 3:1-4 a).

The History of the Ark ( 1 Samuel 4:1 b 1 Samuel 7:1).

The History of Saul ( 1 Samuel 9:1 to 1 Samuel 10:16, 1 Samuel 11, 1 Samuel 13:2-7 a, 1 Samuel 13:15 b 1 Samuel 14:46).

David at Ziklag, Gilboa, David at Hebron, etc. ( 1 Samuel 2:7 – 2 Samuel 6).— The insertions, editorial and from other sources, are rather large in this series of sections, and there is uncertainty as to 1 Samuel 28, which see.

David, Bathsheba, Amnon, Absalom, Sheba (2 Samuel 9-20).— Sometimes called “ The Court History of David.”

The editorial process through which our book was developed from its sources can be only very imperfectly reconstructed; little can be added here to what has been said above. It is often suggested that 2 Samuel 9-20 was omitted from the Deuteronomic edition and restored by a later editor. The editorial arrangement of material has not always followed the order of time, e.g. the events described in 2 Samuel 21-24 are earlier than those in 2 Samuel 9-20. See the commentary on these and other passages.

It must be understood that all our statements as to derivation of sections from sources are largely approximate. When a section is said to be early, that does not exclude the possibility of its having been to some extent annotated or modified by later editors; and when a section is said to be late, that does not mean that a late writer sat down and made it all up out of his own head; he usually worked on the basis of older material, and it may often happen that phrases or sentences from ancient documents are preserved verbatim in late sections. Throughout, a number of minor additions and modifications have been ignored, partly because of the limitation of space, partly in order not to bewilder the reader. This neglect of details, mostly trivial and often merely technical, promotes, rather than hinders, the forming of a correct impression. In the following table, the figures are even more approximate than elsewhere; in some cases the ascription in the table of a section to a source merely means that the bulk of the section is from that source; the more important of the additions will be found in other columns of the table or in the commentary. Especially see 1 Samuel 17:1 to 1 Samuel 18:5, 1 Samuel 28 for the complicated problems connected with those sections.

(J) (E) (E 2 ) (D) (R)

1 Samuel 9:1-10; 1 Samuel 9:16

1 Samuel 11

1 Samuel 13:1-7 a

1 Samuel 13:15 b – 1 Samuel 13:23

1 Samuel 14

1 Samuel 16:14-23

1 Samuel 18

1 Samuel 20-23

1 Samuel 25-31

1 Samuel 4:1 b– 1sam 1 Samuel 7:1

1 Samuel 17:1 to 1 Samuel 18:5

1 Samuel 18:17-19

1 Samuel 19:1-17

1 Samuel 24

1 Samuel 1, 1 Samuel 2:11-16

1 Samuel 3:1-4; 1 Samuel 3:1 a

1 Samuel 13:7 b – 1 Samuel 13:15 a?

1 Samuel 15

1 Samuel 16:1-13?

1 Samuel 18:10 f

1 Samuel 19:18-24?

1 Samuel 21:10-15

1 Samuel 2:27-36

1 Samuel 7, 8

1 Samuel 10:17-27

1 Samuel 12

1 Samuel 21-10

1 Samuel 11:12 ff.

1 Samuel 13:7 b – 1 Samuel 13:15 a?

1 Samuel 14:47-51

1 Samuel 16:1-13?

1 Samuel 19:18-24?

2 Samuel 1-6

2 Samuel 9-20

2 Samuel 21

2 Samuel 23:8-39

2 Samuel 24

2 Samuel 1:6-10

2 Samuel 1:13-16

2 Samuel 7, 8

2 Samuel 22

2 Samuel 23:1-7 Evidence of Composition.— Our book abounds in the duplicate narratives discrepant statements and differences of standpoint which indicate composite authorship. For instance, there are two accounts of the institution of the Monarchy. In 1 Samuel 9:1 to 1 Samuel 10:16, 1 Samuel 11, Samuel is an obscure local seer, and the Monarchy is a boon from Yahweh; in 1 Samuel 8, 1 Samuel 10:17-27, 1 Samuel 12, Samuel is the Judge of all Israel, and the Monarchy is an evil thing, granted as a punishment for the ungrateful importunity of the people. Cf. also 1 Samuel 2:27-36 and 1 Samuel 3; 1 Samuel 13:7 ff. and 1 Samuel 16; 1 Samuel 16:14 ff. and 1 Samuel 17:55 ff; 1 Samuel 18:10 f; 1 Samuel 19:8 ff.; 1 Samuel 18:17 ff. and 1 Samuel 18:20 ff.; 1 Samuel 21:10 ff. and 1 Samuel 27; 1 Samuel 24 and 1 Samuel 26; 1 Samuel 31:4 and 2 Samuel 1:10; 1 Samuel 17:50 and 2 Samuel 21:19.

History and Teaching.— Our book covers the period from the birth of Samuel to almost the close of the reign of David. Probably in an earlier and better division of the books, the history of Eli and Samuel, as the last of the judges, was included in Jg., and the account of the last days of David formed part of our book; so that Samuel began with 1 Samuel 13:1 and ended at 1 Kings 2:11.

(J) and (E) preserve the primitive tradition, and are of the greatest value for the historian; see especially on 2 Samuel 9-20.

These documents also provide us with important information as to the early religious beliefs and practices of Israel; see especially on 1 Samuel 3:3; 1 Samuel 4:4-5; 1 Samuel 10:10 ff; 1 Samuel 14:36 ff; 1 Samuel 16:14 ff; 1 Samuel 19:13; 1 Samuel 26:19 ff., 1 Samuel 28; 2 Samuel 6:6 f; 2 Samuel 15:25 f., 2 Samuel 15:21, and 2 Samuel 15:24. A comparison of the earlier sources with the later additions and with the prophetical and other later portions of OT, teaches us much concerning the methods and progress of the Divine Revelation to Israel. Cf. further the articles on the History of Israel and the Religion of Israel.

Literature.— Commentaries: ( a) Kennedy (Cent.B), Kirkpatrick (CB); ( b) Driver, Notes on the Heb. Text of the Books of Samuel 2 , Smith (ICC); ( c) Budde (KHC and SBOT), Klostermann (KHS), Nowack (HK); ( d) Blaikie (Ex.B). Other Literature: Budde, Richter u. Sam., 1890; Cheyne, Aids to the Devout Study of Criticism; Cook, Hebraica, 1900, p. 145ff.; and the relevant portions of dictionaries and of works on OT Hist., OTT, OTI, etc.


1 Samuel 1-8. Samuel, Eli, and the Ark.— This portion of 1 S. begins with an account of the judgeship of Eli and the misdeeds of his sons, combined with the story of the birth and early life of Samuel ( 1 Samuel 1:1 to 1 Samuel 4:1 a). So far the material is taken from a life of Samuel probably composed towards the close of the Monarchy ( cf. Introduction, p. 273) except 1 Samuel 2:1-10, the Song of Hannah, an independent lyric inserted by the editor, and 1 Samuel 2:27-36, the Mission of the Man of God to Eli, which was probably added by a Deuteronomic editor. Next 1 Samuel 4:1 to 1 Samuel 7:1 is occupied with the fortunes of the Ark and the fate of Eli and his family. Samuel is not mentioned. This is one of the oldest portions of the book ( cf. Introduction, p. 273).

In 1 Samuel 7:2-17 Samuel reappears; the Temple page-boy and youthful seer has now become the leader of all Israel and their deliverer from the Philistines. The source of this section may be the life of Samuel referred to above or it may be Deuteronomic. See, however, the separate notes on these verses.



Bible History, “ Prophetical”— The OT contains books which may be termed historical, but although they are grouped together in our Bibles, this is not the case in the arrangement adopted by the Jews. The only book which they perhaps recognised as history, the Chronicles ( Dibhrê hayyâ mî m, “ words of years” ), is placed at the very end of the sacred volume, whilst the main portion of the books known to us as “ historical” is styled “ prophetical.” Thus the story of Israel is to the Jews in itself a prophecy (that is, a telling forth) of God’ s will and purpose to His people. In accordance with this ideal we find historical episodes interwoven, as in Isaiah and Jeremiah, with prophetic utterances. In judging the historical books, therefore, we must bear in mind that they do not conform to the standard demanded of modern historical writing. They are “ prophetical”— that is, written with a view to edify and instruct— and are not designed to be text-books replete with colourless if accurate historical information.

Main Features of Historical Writing in the Bible.— The Hebrews are remarkable for the interest taken in the past of their nation, and this is the more strange as the Jew does not seem by nature to be disposed towards historical composition. Between the close of the OT story and the dissolution of the Jewish nation in the days of Hadrian, the people passed through some of the most stirring crises in the tragedy of humanity, yet many of the most important are scarcely recorded. But for the renegade Josephus we should have had no particulars of the fall of Jerusalem before the army of Titus. Yet in the OT, though the interest is almost entirely religious, we have a fairly complete record of Israel’ s fortunes from the conquest of its inheritance in Palestine to the restoration of the Jewish polity by Nehemiah.

Variety.— Bible history is remarkable, among other things, for its variety. No book in its present form is arranged like the others. Judges is unmistakable as compared with Joshua; Samuel and Kings have little resemblance; whilst Ezra-Nehemiah belongs to an entirely different school of thought, and Esther is absolutely unique in the OT and even in the Apocrypha. The materials, moreover, of which many of the books are composed are of the most varied description. We have in Kings, to take but a single example, the framework of a chronological history arranged in regnal years, chronicles of the kingdoms, Temple records, biographies, intermingled with which are stories told with all the magic art of portraying scenes inherent in the Eastern raconteur. We find in other books an admixture of pious exhortation, legal formulae, genealogies, and the like. In short, it may be said of the OT books of history that each has its own variegated pattern, which reveals the individuality of its author or compiler.

Choice of Subjects.— In their choice of subjects the prophetical historians of the Hebrew nation display characteristic peculiarities. We are surprised alike at what they tell us and what they omit. They are in a sense the least, and in another the most, patriotic of historians. They dwell but little on the national glories. How briefly are the successes of Saul over the Philistines, or the victories of Omri or Jeroboam II, or even those of the pious kings of Judah, recorded! Their story is often rather that of the nation’ s failure to reach its ideal, and even of how it fell short of the standard attained by less favoured peoples. And yet we cannot read the historical books without feeling chat they are instinct with a love of country and filled with a sense of Yahweh’ s protecting power. But the seeker after historical information will often be disappointed at the lack of facts where he most desires them. No details are given as to how Joshua conquered Central Palestine and conducted the nation to Shechem, its ancient capital. We learn nothing about the arrival of the Philistines, those formidable enemies of Israel. Nothing except the bare fact is preserved of the conquest of Og and his seventy cities. We seek in vain for the cause of David’ s feebleness, which made the revolt of Absalom so formidable. On the other hand, we have abundant details about the feuds with the Shechemites of a person so comparatively unimportant as Abimelech, the son of Gideon, of David’ s flight and his escapes from Saul, etc. The historical books were, as has been asserted, written for edification rather than for information; and it is not always easy, at times it is even impossible, to make a connected narrative out of them. Much of the story as related by the biblical writers must be reconstructed by a process which can hardly receive a name more honourable than that of guesswork.

Chronology.— One of the most formidable difficulties which the student of OT history has to face is that of chronology. In the later parts of the historical and prophetical books we are on fairly sure ground, because the writers give us the date by the year of the reigning kings of Persia. Even in the Books of Kings though there are serious discrepancies in the periods assigned to the kings of Israel and Judah respectively, we are able to date an event within say, ten years or so. We are also assisted by the more accurate chronology of the Assyrians. But the earliest date in Israelite history is that of a defeat inflicted on Ahab and his allies, which is not alluded to in the Bible. This is 854 B.C. From it we can infer that David lived, roughly, about 1000 B.C., but beyond this all is uncertainty. According to 1 Kings 4:1, Solomon’ s Temple was erected 480 years after the Exodus; but, by adding together the periods of affliction and repose given in the Book of Judges, we get an even longer period. But we are told in Exodus 1:11 that the Israelites during their oppression built Pithom and Raamses in Egypt, presumably under the great Rameses II, whose long reign was in the thirteenth century B.C. Consequently the Exodus must have taken place not much earlier than 200 or 250 years before the building of the Temple. The fact is that the ancient Hebrews seem to have used the number 40 and its multiples to express a period of time with considerable vagueness, and we really cannot tell whether they are speaking literally when they mention periods of 40, 20, or 120 years. To give a date even approximately before David is, to say the least, hazardous. We know that Jaddua, the last high priest mentioned in the OT, was alive in 333 B.C., and that Ezra and Nehemiah were in Jerusalem about 432 B.C.; but as to when the Exodus took place, or Joshua conquered Palestine and the events related in the historical books strictly so called begin, we have only the faintest idea.

Survey of Period of Prophetic History.”— The Book of Joshua, with which the history of Israel opens, has now generally been recognised as an integral part of the Pentateuch or five books of the Law. It certainly possesses the same structural peculiarities. It begins, where Deuteronomy leaves off, when Israel is encamped in the plains of Moab. Moses is dead, and Joshua is recognised as his successor. To him God says: “ As I have been with Moses, so will I be with thee.” The conquest of W. Palestine by Joshua is related under two headings: (1) the reduction of the south— the fall of Jericho and Ai and the defeat of the five kings; (2) the victory over the northern king, Jabin of Hazor (but see Judges 4). Central Palestine, viz. Shechem, is assumed already to have fallen into Israelite hands. Only two tribes, Joseph and Judah, receive inheritances from Joshua, Gad and Reuben having already been allotted territory in E. Palestine by Moses. The remaining seven tribes cast lots for the territory which they are permitted to conquer. The different inheritances are given with an abundance of detail, characteristic of P. Joshua charges Israel, as Moses did before his death, and dies on his property at Timnath Serah.

Judges is professedly a continuation of Joshua, but it is very different in style, scope, and arrangement; whereas Joshua is closely akin to the legal books, Judges rather resembles the historical. It covers a much longer period, extending over twelve judgeships, and is arranged on a distinct plan. In each case Israel sins, God punishes by an invasion, the nation repents, and a deliverer is raised up. Two supplementary narratives close the book, to show the state of the country when there was no king. It may be that the Book of Ruth is a third supplement, to show the origin of the great royal house of David.

The next four books, Samuel and Kings, are called by the Greek translators Books of Kingdoms” (βασιλειῶ?ν ) . 1 S. opens with the story of Samuel’ s birth in the days of Eli, the priestly judge, and gives an account of the loss of the Ark and the utter degradation of Israel under the Philistine yoke. Samuel, the first of the prophets, is the leader in the great struggle, and is compelled by the people to set a king over the nation in the person of Saul, who does much for the emancipation of his people, but is rejected by God and falls in battle against the Philistines. The main part of the last half of 1 S. is chiefly occupied with the hairbreadth escapes and adventures of David, the real founder of the monarchy, who is described as the “ man after God’ s own heart.” More space is given to him than to any other person mentioned in the Bible, about half 1 S., all 2 S., and two chapters of 1 K. forming his biography. 1 Kings is divided between the reign of Solomon, with an elaborate account of the Temple and its dedication, and the story of the division of the kingdom till the death of Ahab. The second book carries the reader down through the later history of the divided monarchy, relating the fall of the northern, and concluding with a history of the southern kingdom, the destruction of Jerusalem and the Captivity, to the restoration of Jehoiachin to a certain degree of honour by the son of Nebuchadrezzar. The latter period has to be supplemented by the historical portions of Jeremiah and the allusions to contemporary events in Isaiah and Ezekiel.

Characteristics of Prophetical History.— The books we have already considered represent the standpoint of the prophets of Israel; and, as we have seen, Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings are known as the first four of the prophetical books. Generally speaking, the view they take of the nation is that it is the people of God, who are specially bound to act in accordance with their high calling, though as a rule they fail lamentably to attain the standard demanded of them. But in no case is Israel represented as having a law like that known in after days as the “ Law of Moses” ; or, if it had, the majority of the nation, priests and prophets included, were completely ignorant of its contents. The ritual practices of all the saints and heroes of Israel throughout these books are quite different from those prescribed in Lev. and Nu., and if there is any Law it is rather that of the earliest legal chapters in Ex. (20– 23).

Later Historical Writings.— Of the remaining historical books, Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah (the two latter being often reckoned as one book) form a complete series. Chronicles is a sort of revised edition of all the earlier history, whilst the two other books continue the narrative. The object of the writer of Chronicles is to give the impression that the kings of Judah— for Israel is only incidentally mentioned— were scrupulous in carrying out the Pentateuchal Law as it appears in the Priest’ s Code. Thus David will allow only Levites to bear the Ark, and we read much of his care to provide for the ritual, and especially the music, of the sanctuary. Solomon, represented as a powerful though not always faithful monarch in the Book of Kings, here appears as a blameless ruler. When a king like Uzziah presumes to undertake priestly functions, he is smitten with disease. In short, the whole is permeated by a priestly conception of history entirely foreign to the Book of Kings. Chronicles takes us to the end of the Captivity, and closes with the decree of Cyrus commanding the Jews to return and rebuild the Temple at Jerusalem. Ezra-Nehemiah, for the two books are really one, opens with this edict, relates how the altar was set up and the Temple commenced, and how the proceedings were hindered by the “ adversaries of Judah and Benjamin” ( i.e. the Samaritans). During the reign of two Persian kings nothing was done, but under Darius the work was resumed and completed about 516 B.C. Then there is a complete silence for nearly two generations, when, in the reign of Artaxerxes Longimanus (464– 424 B.C.), Ezra, a Jewish priest, was permitted to lead a company of exiles back to Jerusalem. A Jewish governor named Nehemiah was then appointed, and we are told how he and Ezra restored Jerusalem, and made the nation obey the Law of Moses. With these two great men the Bible history concludes about the year 432 B.C.

Extant Hebrew History the Fragment of a Lost Literature.— There is little doubt that the literature of ancient Israel was not confined to the OT as we now have it. On the contrary, the books bear evident traces of having been compressed into their present limits by the omission of facts which must have been recorded, and are almost necessary to a right understanding of what stands recorded. To take but a single example: the reign of Omri ( 1 Kings 16:29-34) is related with the utmost brevity, and many things are omitted which would have thrown light on the subsequent history, and cannot fail to have been known by the author. Nothing, for instance, in Kings would lead us to suppose that the king who defeated Tibni and built Samaria was so important that rulers of Israel, though belonging to the very dynasty which had supplanted his own, should call themselves “ sons of Omri.” 2 Kings 3 relates a rebellion of Moab against Israel, and we know from the Moabite Stone (p. 305) that Omri had oppressed Moab and probably imposed upon it the onerous conditions hinted at in this chapter. Further, the severe terms exacted by the Syrians in the days of Omri (1 Kings 20) imply a serious defeat of Israel, to which no allusion is made. Although it cannot be proved that these were recorded in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel, it is highly probable that this was the case, and that the writer of Kings deliberately hurried over this important reign in order to record events which seemed to him to be of greater interest or more to the edification of his readers.

But the historical writers in the OT openly confess the fact that there was a considerable literature to which their readers might have access. The Book of Jashar (Jos., 2 S.), the Chronicles of Israel and of Judah, alluded to in Kings, and the many works cited in the late Book of Chronicles, show that there was an extensive literature in existence even as late as 300 B.C. which has completely disappeared, and that we have only fragments from which to reconstruct the story of ancient Israel.

The External Sources of Hebrew History.— Besides the sources mentioned in the historical books we may mention the external sources which connect the history of the Hebrews with that of the world at large, in addition to those which criticism has indicated as the materials used by the writers and redactors of the historical books.

( a) One of the most serious objections to the antiquity of the Jewish people, which Josephus had to answer, was the silence of the Greek authors regarding them. He accounts for this by the fact that the ancestors of the Jews did not inhabit a maritime country and engaged little in trade, being occupied m living their own peculiarly religious life ( Apion. 12). Josephus appeals, however, to the Tyrian records for the building of Solomon’ s Temple, quoting Dius (ch. 17) and Menander of Ephesus (ch. 18). He also quotes the testimony of the Babylonian Berossus (ch. 19) to the story of Noah, and on the treatment of the Jews by Nebuchadrezzar, and he relates that a writer named Megasthenes alludes to the first destruction of Jerusalem. But Josephus is evidently able to give his readers very little testimony, external to the Scriptures, for the history of Israel.

( b) Nor was more light thrown upon the subject till recent years, when the secrets of the hieroglyphic and of the cuneiform characters were revealed. Direct allusions to the Israelites are few, and can be easily enumerated: ( a) The word Is-ra-e-ru, “ Israelite,” occurs on the stele of Merenptah (thirteenth century B.C.), describing Egyptian victories over Israel; ( b) Shishak (1 K.) relates his devastation of Palestine (tenth century B.C.); ( c) Ahab is mentioned in the Qarqara inscription as one of the kings allied against Assyria (864 B.C.); ( d) Jehu’ s name, as of a king paying tribute to Shalmaneser II, is found on the Black Obelisk (British Museum), 842 B.C.; ( e) Pekah and Hoshea (2 Kings 15) appear in an inscription, 737 B.C. and the fall of Samaria in 722 B.C.; ( f) Hezekiah’ s name appears on the Taylor Cylinder (British Museum), 701 B.C.; ( g) at an earlier date, probably in the ninth century B.C., we have on the Moabite stone Mesha’ s account of his rebellion against Israel ( 2 Kings 3:1).

( c) As in the case of the Pentateuch, the materials used by the writers other than those specified by them are mainly matters of conjecture, but they may be roughly enumerated as follows: Judges, like the Pentateuch, is probably made up of two early documents, J and E, which were thrown into their present form— subject, however, to revision— by a Deuteronomic editor, whilst portions were added by a reviser of the school of P. The Books of Samuel, like Judges, have been subject to Deuteronomic and post-exilic revisions; but in the life of Saul we have a combination of two works, one hostile and the other friendly to monarchical institutions. The compiler drew upon traditions of David, a life of Samuel, and a very ancient account of David’ s reign (2 Samuel 9-20). In 2 Samuel 1:18 the Book of Jashar ( cf. Joshua 10:12-14) is quoted. The author of Kings alludes to the chronicles of the kings of Israel and the chronicles of the kings of Judah, and he probably had before him independent narratives of Solomon, Elijah, Elisha, etc., as well as the records of the Temple at Jerusalem.

The Miraculous in Hebrew History.— The historian has a natural distrust of the miraculous when he meets with it in records, not because he cannot believe in its possibility— for experience has taught him to be very cautious in saying that any event could not have occurred— but because a natural love of the marvellous makes men credulous in accepting supernatural explanations of events. Moreover, it is undeniable that the Hebrew writers regarded the whole story of the nation as a far greater miracle than any apparent interference with the laws of nature, because in every event they thought they saw the hand of the Lord of the whole earth shaping and directing the destinies of Israel. Nevertheless the impartial reader is impressed more by the absence than by the superabundance of miracle in the story of a people so intimately connected with its God as Israel, in so ancient and confessedly so religious a record as that found in the historical Scriptures. When we divide the miraculous events into ( a) subjective wonders— i.e. visions, Divine messages, and the like, which may, at any rate, be accounted for by the state of mind of those who experienced them; ( b) signs which were an acknowledged medium of God’ s communication with Israel; and ( c) wonders interrupting the natural course of history. we have to acknowledge the comparative rarity of the last-named.

Taking 1 K. as an example, the presence of the miraculous under the above classification is :

In 1 Kings 1-11, which relates the accession of Solomon and his reign, only two miracles are recorded— Solomon’ s vision at Gibeon ( 1 Kings 3:5), and the cloud filling the Temple at its dedication ( 1 Kings 8:10). These may be classed under ( a) visions and ( b) signs respectively.

1 Kings 12-16, the account of the division of the kingdoms. No miracle appears except the signs which accompany the denunciation of the schism of Jeroboam in 1 Kings 13— i.e. the temporary drying up of the king’ s hand, the rending of the altar, and the punishment of the disobedient prophet. These all come into the category ( b), signs.

1 Kings 17 – 2 Kings 2. Even in the life of Elijah, a man with admittedly supernatural powers, miracle is rare. His being fed by ravens is perhaps a doubtful miracle (see Commentary). The multiplying of the widow’ s cruse, the raising of her son from the dead, and the destruction of the captains of fifty, come under class ( c) wonders; unless we include the descent of fire at Carmel on the sacrifice, which may be regarded as a sign ( b), or the prophet’ s ascension, which may also be explained as a vision ( a). Considering its momentous character and the great men who lived in it, in the period from David to Elijah miracles are conspicuous by their absence.

History as Compared with Prophecy.— Though, as we have seen, the supernatural as manifested in miracle is of comparatively rare occurrence in Hebrew history, it is assumed throughout that events are under the control of Yahweh, the God of Israel. This is, as a rule, revealed in history by the prophets. It is their function to declare the will of God and His immediate purpose, together with the punishment which will follow if it be disregarded. Rarely is the prophet made to disclose the remote future, as when the messenger to Jeroboam predicts the destruction of his altar by a king of Judah, “ Josiah by name.” As a rule the prophets in history play somewhat the same part as the chorus in a Greek play: they explain events as the tragedy of Israel progresses. It is not till a late period, almost at the close of the history of the northern kingdom, that we get the literary prophet supplementing the narrative, and that we are able to construct history from the fragments preserved in the utterances of the prophets. The literary prophets from the eighth century onward stand in much the same relation to the recorded history in the OT as do the Epistles of Paul towards the Acts of the Apostles. Both are documents contemporary with the events, but, as a rule, these abound in allusions, the meaning of which can only be conjectured. Amos and Hosea give a view of Israel’ s later history, and Isaiah of Judah’ s relations with Assyria, differing from the records in Kings; just as the Epistle to the Galatians gives a very different impression of the controversy between the Jewish and Gentile Christians from what could be gathered from the Acts. It is, however, necessary to exercise much discretion in the use of the prophets for historical purposes, as both the Hebrew text and the genuineness of many passages are subjects of considerable dispute.

How far does the OT Give us Strict History?— The Bible, it has been already suggested, can hardly be said to record history with the strict accuracy demanded of a modern work. As it is easy to see from the Pss., the prophets, the Apocryphal literature, and the NT, the religious interest in history practically ceased with David, and was mainly centred in the primitive story as told in Genesis and in the deliverance from Egypt and the wanderings in the wilderness. The record from Joshua to the destruction of Jerusalem by the Chaldeans as it appears in the OT is a fragmentary story of Israel, gathered from a number of lost sources and told for the sake of showing how the nation fell short of the ideal designed for it, and of the punishments which ensued. The writers or compilers, living centuries after the event, are usually less interested in the accuracy of their narrative than in the moral they wished to point. Formerly what was called inspiration was deemed to be so bound up with the exact truth of the record as to stand or fall with it. Consequently the unbeliever made his main point of attack some disputable statement, which the faithful were in honour bound to defend. Now, however, it is generally recognised that no early record can be expected to give the exact circumstances, especially when much of it is demonstrably not contemporary with the events; and in a work like the historical section of the OT we look rather to the purpose of the author than the details in which it is discoverable. The former is, in the biblical narrative, sufficiently clear. The history is professedly a commentary on the dealing of Yahweh with His people, showing in what manner He bore with their backslidings, punished and delivered them. The books were never intended to supply an accurate and exhaustive chronicle of events for the modern historian. All that can be claimed for them is that they give an outline, often singularly dispassionate and impartial, of the fortunes which befell the nation of Israel.

Ads FreeProfile