the Fifth Week of Lent
The 1901 Jewish Encyclopedia
"herem": A proclamation devoting or consecrating to the Deity persons or things to be excluded from use, or, as was the rule in Biblical times, to be utterly destroyed. The noun "á¸¥erem," or the verb "heá¸¥erim," translated in A. V. "utterly destroyed" (Exodus 22:19 [R. V. 20]; Numbers 21:2,3; Deuteronomy 2:34, 7:2; 1 Samuel 15:3), "devoted" (Leviticus 27:28,29; Numbers 18:14), "dedicated" (Ezekiel 44:29), or "consecrated" (Micah 4:13), also, rather inaccurately, "accursed" (Joshua 6:17; 7:1,11-15), denotes, like "heá¸³desh" from "á¸³odesh" (Jeremiah 12:3), consecration or separation; being derived from the same root as the Arabic "á¸¥aram" (sacred territory) and "á¸¥arim" (forbidden ground) or "á¸¥arem" (forbidden person; compare the Assyrian "á¸¥arimtu," hierodule). Whatever is devoted or banned ("á¸¥erem") is "most holy unto the Lord" ("á¸³odesh á¸³odashim"; Leviticus 27:28). The practise of devoting to the Deity the spoils of war, persons or things, found among all ancient nations and primitive tribes, is inseparably connected with the idea of a holy warfare which claims all booty for the god who leads to victory and in whose honor the captured foes, as well as goods, are destroyed on the spot (see, concerning the Teutonic and Celtic tribes, Tacitus, "Annales," 1:61, 13:57; CÃ¦sar, "De Bello Gallico," 6:17; respecting the Indians, Waitz, "Anthropologie," 3:157; and for the Arabs, the passages quoted by Schwally, "Kriegsalterthuemer," pp. 35-38).
Ban Devoted to the Deity.
King Mesha of Moab tells in his inscription (lines 16-18) how, after having carried off the vessels of Yhwh from the city of Nebo and dragged them before Kemosh, his god, he devoted ("heá¸¥eramti") 7,000 prisoners to Ashtor-Kemosh, and how he"slew the inhabitants of Aá¹á¹arot as a spectacle to his god Kemosh" (line 12). As a rule, the people, before going to war, devoted, in the form of a vow, the whole booty to the deity in order to secure its victorious aid. So did the Teutons and Gauls, according to Tacitus and CÃ¦sar; and in like manner did Israel vow to "ban" the Canaanites and their cities in case God would deliver them into his hand: "and they banned [A. V. "utterly destroyed"] them and their cities: and he called the name of the place Hormah" (Numbers 21:3).
Achan and Agag.
The people of Israel being throughout the entire pre-exilic history engaged in a warfare against idolatrous nations, the view of the consecration of the booty, whether expressed beforehand in a vow or not, lent its coloring to every battle; consequently, the doom of the Ban fell not only upon the persons and things captured, but also upon him who appropriated them, and even upon the very house where the devoted thing was sacrilegiously placed. Thus, before the capture of Jericho, Joshua (6:17,18) proclaimed that the city and all that was therein should be devoted to the Lord; and he warned the people, saying: "Keep yourselves from the ban [A. V. "accursed thing"], lest ye make yourselves ban [A. V. "accursed"], when ye take of the ban [A. V. "accursed thing"], and make the camp of Israel a ban [A. V. "a curse"], and bring doom upon it [A. V. "trouble it"]." Accordingly, "all the silver and gold and the vessels of brass and iron are consecrated ["á¸³odesh"] unto the Lord: they shall come into the treasury of the Lord . . . and they devoted ["vayaá¸¥arimu"; A. V. "utterly destroyed"] all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword" (Joshua 6:19-21). In taking of the devoted booty, Achan, therefore, brought doom upon the whole people; and they themselves came under the ban (A. V. "curse") until he and his household, upon whom the Ban rested, were exterminated (Joshua 7:11-15,25). Likewise, in the war against Amalek, Samuel caused the people to devote (A. V. "utterly destroy") all that Amalek had, without sparing any one, and to "slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass" (1 Samuel 15:3). Saul, however, "banned [A. V. "utterly destroyed"] all the people with the edge of the sword, but . . . spared Agag and the best of the sheep, and of the oxen, and of the fatlings, and the lambs, and all that was good" (ib. 8, 9); banning only that part of the property which was vile and refuse. He thereby provoked the wrath of God; and in fulfilment of the Ban, Agag was hewn in pieces before the Lord (ib. 32). The oath of King Saul not to eat anything until the battle with the Philistines was decided, the violation of which almost cost Jonathan his life (1 Samuel 14:24-46), does not fall under the category of "á¸¥erem," or Ban; it was a vow like Jephthah's.
Ban in War.
The Ban as a primitive war measure was especially enforced in the Deuteronomic legislation: "When the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee thou shalt smite them, and ban [A. V. "utterly destroy"] them" (Deuteronomy 7:2). "Thou shalt not covet [A. V. "desire"] the silver or gold that is on them [the graven images] . . . neither shalt thou bring an abomination unto thine house, lest thou be a ban [A. V. "accursed thing"] like it" (ib. 7:25,26; compare ib. 20:16-18). This is accordingly related as having been carried out by Joshua (Joshua 10:1,28-40; 11:11-21; but compare 1 Kings 9:21). With some modification it is told of Sihon, king of Heshbon: "We took all his cities at that time, and banned [A. V. "utterly destroyed"] the men, and the women, and the little ones . . . only the cattle we took for a prey unto ourselves, and the spoil of the cities which we took" (Deuteronomy 2:34,35).
Against Idolatrous Cities.
The idolatrous Israelite city was to be treated in the same way as the Canaanite: "Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, banning it [A. V. "destroying it utterly"], and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword. And thou shalt gather all the spoil of it into the midst of the street thereof, and shalt burn with fire the city and all the spoil thereof as a holocaust [A. V. "every whit"] to [for] the Lord thy God: and it shall not be built again [A. V. "a heap for ever"], and there shall cleave nought of the devoted [A. V. "cursed"] thing to thine hand" (Deuteronomy 13:16-18 [15-17]). The banned city was made a place of desolation. So in the case of Jericho (Joshua 6:26; 1 Kings 16:34) and Ai (Joshua 8:28, "shemamah"; compare Judges 9:45); and this probably led later on to an identification of "á¸¥erem" with "shammata" (desolation; see see ANATHEMA). Somewhat modified for the occasion, the Ban was also proclaimed in the Benjamite war: "Ye shall ban [A. V. "utterly destroy"] every male, and every woman that hath bad intercourse with [A. V. "lain by"] man" (Judges 21:11,12; compare Numbers 31:17 et seq.); 1 Kings 9:21; 2 Kings 19:11; Jeremiah 25:9,1. 26, 51:26; Malachi 3:24; Zach. 14:11).
The man or the people under the Ban ("ish á¸¥ermi" =a man of my ban [A. V. "a man whom I appointed to utter destruction"], Kings 20:42; or "hermi" = the people of my ban [A. V. "of my curse"], Isaiah 34:5) must not be allowed to escape their doom. All the idolatrous nations are under the Ban (Isaiah 34:2; Jeremiah 25:9; Micah 4:13).
In the same degree as the Ban proved to be a rigid war measure against idolatrous nations, it was resorted to also in the case of idolatrous individuals. Hence the law set down already in the oldest legislation, "He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the Lord only, he shall be banned" (A. V. "utterly destroyed," Exodus 22:19 ), and the one in Leviticus 27:29, "None devoted, which shall be devoted of men, shall be redeemed; but shall surely be put to death," seem to deal with the case of an idolater (see the commentaries of Dillmann, Driver, and Kalisch).
In an altogether different sense is the word "á¸¥erem" (devotion) used in the last-mentioned verse, as well as in Ezekiel 44:29, and Numbers 18:14. It is the thing devoted by virtue of a simple vow which is declared to belong not to the Lord, but to the priest. In this sense the Rabbis read also Leviticus 2729 (see Sifra and Targ. Yer.) as referring to the vow of the value of a criminal guilty of capital punishment. Here "á¸¥erem" is the same as the rabbinical "heá¸³desh."
In post-exilic times the á¸¥erem as a war measure against idolaters no longer found any application. Nevertheless it was employed as a means of ecclesiastical discipline to keep the community clear of undesirable, semi-heathenish elements; and when the new constitution was to be adopted for the new colony, those that would not participate in the assembly of the children of the captivity, had, according to the counsel of the princes and elders, all their substance devoted (A. V. "forfeited"), and were themselves separated from the community (Ezra 10:8). Here the Ban, or á¸¥erem, assumed a new meaning: it meant no longer destruction, but confiscation of goods, and excommunicationâpossibly exposure to starvation ("shammatta"; ANATHEMA)âof the person; see BANISHMENT, EXCOMMUNICATION.
- Cheyne and Black, Encyc. Bibl. s. Ban;
- Hastings, Dict. of the Bible, s. Curse;
- Riehms, HandwÃ¶rterbuch, and Hamburger, R. B. T., s. Bann;
- Nowack, HebrÃ¤ische ArchÃ¤logie, 1874, 2:266 et seq.;
- Benzinger, HebrÃ¤ische ArchÃ¤ologie, 1874, p. 363;
- R. Smith, Religion of the Semites, 1889, pp. 434 et seq.;
- F. Schwally, Semitische KriegsalterthÃ¼mer, 1901, part 1;
- S. Mandl., Der Bann, Bruenn, 1898.
These files are public domain.
Singer, Isidore, Ph.D, Projector and Managing Editor. Entry for 'Ban'. 1901 The Jewish Encyclopedia. https://www.studylight.org/​encyclopedias/​eng/​tje/​b/ban.html. 1901.