Daniël 2:26

Staten Vertaling

De koning antwoordde en zeide tot Daniel, wiens naam Beltsazar was: Zijt gij machtig mij bekend te maken den droom, dien ik gezien heb, en zijn uitlegging?

Parallel Translations

Gereviseerde Lutherse Vertaling
De koning antwoordde en sprak tot Danil, ook Belsazar genaamd: Zijt gij degene, die mij den droom, dien ik gezien heb, en zijne betekenis kan te kennen geven?

Gereviseerde Leidse Vertaling
De koning antwoordde en zeide tot Daniel, die den naam Beltsjassar droeg: Zijt gij in staat mij den droom dien ik gezien heb en den uitleg er van mee te delen?

Bible Verse Review
  from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge

Daniel: Daniel 1:7, Daniel 4:8, Daniel 4:19, Daniel 5:12

Art: Daniel 2:3-7, Daniel 4:18, Daniel 5:16, Genesis 41:15, 1 Samuel 17:33

Gill's Notes on the Bible

The king answered and said to Daniel, whose name was Belteshazzar,.... The name given him by the prince of the eunuchs, Daniel 1:7, and by which he was known to Nebuchadnezzar; and very likely he called him now by this name, which is the reason of its being mentioned:

art thou able to make known unto me the dream which I have seen, and the interpretation thereof? this he said, either as doubting and questioning, or as admiring that one so young should be able to do that, which his seniors, the wise men in Babylon, could not do; or he put this question, as impatient to hear what he must expect from him, whether the performance of his promise, or such an answer as the wise men had given him.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible

The king answered, and said to Daniel, whose name was Belteshazzar - See the notes at Daniel 1:7. The “king” may have addressed him by this name, and probably did during this interview. This was the name, it would seem, by which he was known in Babylon - a name which implied honor and respectability, as being conferred on one whom it was supposed the principal Babylonian divinity favored.

Art thou able to make known unto me the dream? - One of the first points in the difficulty was to recal “the dream itself,” and hence, this was the first inquiry which the king presented. If he could not recal that, of course the matter was at an end, and the law would be suffered to take its course.