the Second Week after Easter
Click here to learn more!
Read the Bible
Wycliffe Bible
Deuteronomy 14:11
Bible Study Resources
Concordances:
- Nave'sDictionaries:
- AmericanEncyclopedias:
- InternationalParallel Translations
“You may eat every clean bird,
Of all clean birds you may eat.
Of all clean birds ye shall eat.
"All of the birds that are clean you may eat.
"You may eat all clean birds.
You may eat any clean bird.
All ritually clean birds you may eat.
"You may eat any clean bird.
"You may eat any clean bird.
Of all cleane birdes ye shall eate:
"You may eat any clean bird.
You can eat any clean bird.
"You may eat any clean bird;
All clean birds shall ye eat.
"You may eat any clean bird.
Of all clean birds you shall eat.
"You may eat any clean bird.
You shall eat of all clean birds.
Eate of all cleane foules.
Of all clean birds ye may eat.
All clean birds may be used for food.
Of all cleane byrdes ye shall eate.
Of all clean birds ye may eat.
Of all cleane birds ye shall eate.
Ye shall eat every clean bird.
Of all clean birds ye may eat.
You may eat any clean bird,
`Any clean bird ye do eat;
Of all clean birds you may eat.
[Of] all clean birds ye shall eat.
Of all clean birds you may eat.
"All clean birds you may eat.
"You may eat any bird that is ceremonially clean.
"You may eat any clean bird.
You may eat any clean birds.
Of every clean bird, ye may eat;
All birds that are clean you shall eat.
"You may eat all clean birds.
You may eat any ritually clean bird. These are the exceptions, so don't eat these: eagle, vulture, black vulture, kite, falcon, the buzzard family, the raven family, ostrich, nighthawk, the hawk family, little owl, great owl, white owl, pelican, osprey, cormorant, stork, the heron family, hoopoe, bat.
"You may eat any clean bird.
Contextual Overview
Bible Verse Review
from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge
Cross-References
And he took Saray, his wijf, and Loth, the sone of his brother, and al the substaunce which thei hadden in possessioun, and the men whiche thei hadden bigete in Aran; and thei yeden out that thei `schulen go in to the loond of Chanaan. And whanne they camen in to it,
And he brouyte ayen al the catel, and Loth his brother with his catel, also wymmen and the puple.
Forsothe the kyng of Sodom seide to Abram, Yyue thou the men to me; take thou othir thingis to thee.
Thin oxe be offrid bifor thee, and ete thou not therof; thin asse be rauyschid in thi siyt, and be not yoldun to thee; thi scheep be youun to thin enemyes, and noon be that helpe thee.
The Lord smyte thee with the worste botche in the knees, and in the hyndere partes of the leg; and thou mow not be heelid fro the sole of the foot `til to the top.
And schal deuoure the fruyt of thi beestis, and the fruytis of thi lond, til thou perischist, and schal not leeue to thee wheete, wyn, and oile, droues of oxun, and flockis of scheep,
Gill's Notes on the Bible
Of all clean birds ye shall eat. Which the Targum of Jonathan describes, everyone that has a craw, and whose crop is naked, and has a superfluous talon, and is not rapacious; but such as are unclean are expressed by name in the following verses, so that all except them might be reckoned clean and fit for food. Maimonides p observes, that only the number of the unclean are reckoned, so that all the rest are free.
p Hilchot. Maacolot Asurot, c. 1. sect. 14.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Compare Leviticus 11:0. The variations here, whether omissions or additions, are probably to be explained by the time and circumstances of the speaker.
Deuteronomy 14:5
The “pygarg” is a species of gazelle, and the “wild ox” and “chamois” are swift types of antelope.
Deuteronomy 14:21
The prohibition is repeated from Leviticus 22:8. The directions as to the disposal of the carcass are unique to Deuteronomy, and their motive is clear. To have forbidden the people either themselves to eat that which had died, or to allow any others to do so, would have involved loss of property, and consequent temptation to an infraction of the command. The permissions now for the first time granted would have been useless in the wilderness. During the 40 years’ wandering there could be but little opportunity of selling such carcasses; while non-Israelites living in the camp would in such a matter be bound by the same rules as the Israelites Leviticus 17:15; Leviticus 24:22. Further, it would seem (compare Leviticus 17:15) that greater stringency is here given to the requirement of abstinence from that which had died of itself. Probably on this, as on so many other points, allowance was made for the circumstances of the people. Flesh meat was no doubt often scarce in the desert. It would therefore have been a hardship to forbid entirely the use of that which had not been killed. However, now that the plenty of the promised land was before them, the modified toleration of this unholy food was withdrawn.
