Esdras 10:15

La Bible Ostervald

Il n'y eut que Jonathan, fils d'Asaël, et Jachzia, fils de Thikva, qui s'opposèrent à cela; et Méshullam et Shabbéthaï, le Lévite, les appuyèrent.

Parallel Translations

Darby's French Translation
Seuls, Jonathan, fils d'As�a�l, et Jakhzia, fils de Thikva, s'oppos�rent � cela; et Meshullam, et Shabtha�, le l�vite, les appuy�rent.

Louis Segond (1910)
Jonathan, fils d'Asa�l, et Jachzia, fils de Thikva, appuy�s par Meschullam et par le L�vite Schabtha�, furent les seuls � combattre cet avis,

La Bible David Martin (1744)
Et Jonathan fils d'Haza�l, et Jahz�ja fils de Tikva furent �tablis pour cette affaire; et M�sullam et Sab�tha�, L�vites, les aid�rent.

Bible Verse Review
  from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge

were employed: Heb. stood

Meshullam: Nehemiah 3:6, Nehemiah 10:20, Nehemiah 12:33

Shabbethai: Nehemiah 11:16

Gill's Notes on the Bible

Only Jonathan the son of Asahel, and Jahaziah the son of Tikvah, were employed about the matter,.... To see that this affair was conducted in the manner proposed; that the magistrates of every city brought the persons that had been delinquents, in their turns, of which they gave them notice, and took the account of them as they came:

and Meshullam and Shabbethai the Levite helped them; assisted them in this work; the other two perhaps were priests, and both these Levites; and these four were the only persons appointed over this matter, as the phrase in the preceding clause may signify; though Jarchi interprets it to a quite contrary sense, that they were the only persons that opposed and objected to it; and so Dr. Lightfoot r understands it, and renders it, "stood against this matter"; in which they were seconded by the two Levites, and the sense is very probable.

r Works, vol. 1. p. 144.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible

Some translate it: “Nevertheless, Jonathan the son of Asahel and Jahaziah the son of Tikvah opposed this.” The opposition was useless Ezra 10:16.