1 Tawarikh 8:29

Bahasa Indonesia Sehari-hari

Tetapi di Gibeon diam bapa Gibeon, yakni Yeiel, dan nama isterinya ialah Maakha.

Parallel Translations

Alkitab Terjemahan Baru
Tetapi di Gibeon diam bapa Gibeon, yakni Yeiel, dan nama isterinya ialah Maakha.

Alkitab Terjemahan Lama
Maka di Gibeon duduklah bapa Gibeon dan nama bininya itulah Maakha.

Contextual Overview

¹ Beniamin begat Bela his eldest sonne, Asbel the second, and Aharah the thirde, ² Nohah the fourth, & Raphah the fyfth. ³ And the sonnes of Bela, were: Adar, Gera, Abihud, ⁴ Abisna, Naaman, and Ahoha, ⁵ Gera, Sephuphan, and Huram. ⁶ And these are the sonnes of Ehud, and these are auncient heades among the inhabiters of Geba, and they caryed them to Manahath: ⁷ Naaman, Ahia, and Gera, which Gera caryed them away, and begat Uzza, and Ahihud. ⁸ And he begat Saharaim in the fielde of Moab, after he had sent them away, Husim also, & Baarah were his wyues. ⁹ And he begat of Hodes his wyfe, Iobab, and Zibia, Mesa, and Malcham, ¹⁰ Ieuz, and Sachia, and Mirma: These were his sonnes [and] auncient fathers.

Bible Verse Review
  from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge

the father: 1 Chronicles 9:35, 1 Chronicles 9:36, Jehiel

Reciprocal: 1 Chronicles 2:42 - the father of Hebron

Gill's Notes on the Bible

And at Gibeon dwelt the father of Gibeon,.... The builder of the city, and prince of the inhabitants of it, which was in the tribe of Benjamin, Joshua 18:25 whose name was Jehiel, 1 Chronicles 9:35,

(whose wife's name was Maachah;) of which name were many, see 1 Chronicles 2:48.

Clarke's Notes on the Bible

Verse 1 Chronicles 8:29. And at Gibeon — This passage to the end of the 38th verse is found with a little variety in the names, 1 Chronicles 9:35-44.

The rabbins say that Ezra, having found two books that had these passages with a variety in the names, as they agreed in general, he thought best to insert them both, not being able to discern which was the best.

His general plan was to collate all the copies he had, and to follow the greater number when he found them to agree; those which disagreed from the majority were thrown aside as spurious; and yet, in many cases, probably the rejected copies contained the true text.

If Ezra proceeded as R. Sol. Jarchi says, he had a very imperfect notion of the rules of true criticism; and it is no wonder that he has left so many faults in his text.