Lectionary Calendar
Saturday, April 18th, 2026
the Second Week after Easter
Attention!
StudyLight.org has pledged to help build churches in Uganda. Help us with that pledge and support pastors in the heart of Africa.
Click here to join the effort!

Read the Bible

Chinese NCV (Simplified)

马太福音 26:66

認為怎樣呢?”他們回答:“他是該死的。”

Bible Study Resources

Concordances:

- Nave's Topical Bible - Church;   Court;   Government;   Jesus, the Christ;   Prayer;   Priest;   Prisoners;   Verdict;   Torrey's Topical Textbook - Christ Is God;   Courts of Justice;  

Dictionaries:

- American Tract Society Bible Dictionary - Caiaphas;   Bridgeway Bible Dictionary - Crucifixion;   Sanhedrin;   Son of god;   Baker Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology - Government;   Jesus Christ;   Charles Buck Theological Dictionary - Universalists;   Easton Bible Dictionary - Annas;   Fausset Bible Dictionary - Son of God;   Holman Bible Dictionary - Capital Punishment;   Matthew, the Gospel of;   Messiah;   Hastings' Dictionary of the Bible - Caiaphas;   John, Gospel of;   Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament - Matthew, Gospel According to;   Trial of Jesus;   The Hawker's Poor Man's Concordance And Dictionary - Passover;   People's Dictionary of the Bible - Blasphemy;  

Encyclopedias:

- Condensed Biblical Cyclopedia - Jesus of Nazareth;   International Standard Bible Encyclopedia - Caiaphas;   Guilty;   Jesus Christ, the Arrest and Trial of;   Punishments;  

Parallel Translations

Chinese Union (Simplified)
你 们 的 意 见 如 何 ? 他 们 回 答 说 : 他 是 该 死 的 。

Contextual Overview

57 Those people who arrested Jesus led him to the house of Caiaphas, the high priest, where the teachers of the law and the elders were gathered. 58 Peter followed far behind to the courtyard of the high priest's house, and he sat down with the guards to see what would happen to Jesus. 59 The leading priests and the whole Jewish council tried to find something false against Jesus so they could kill him. 60 Many people came and told lies about him, but the council could find no real reason to kill him. Then two people came and said, 61 "This man said, ‘I can destroy the Temple of God and build it again in three days.'" 62 Then the high priest stood up and said to Jesus, "Aren't you going to answer? Don't you have something to say about their charges against you?" 63 But Jesus said nothing. Again the high priest said to Jesus, "I command you by the power of the living God: Tell us if you are the Christ, the Son of God." 64 Jesus answered, "Those are your words. But I tell you, in the future you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of God, the Powerful One, and coming on clouds in the sky." 65 When the high priest heard this, he tore his clothes and said, "This man has said things that are against God! We don't need any more witnesses; you all heard him say these things against God. 66 What do you think?" The people answered, "He should die."

Bible Verse Review
  from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge

He: Leviticus 24:11-16, John 19:7, Acts 7:52, Acts 13:27, Acts 13:28, James 5:6

Reciprocal: Deuteronomy 21:22 - General Psalms 22:7 - shoot out Psalms 109:20 - them Isaiah 53:8 - General Jeremiah 26:11 - saying Matthew 20:18 - they Mark 10:33 - condemn Mark 14:64 - General Luke 22:71 - General

Gill's Notes on the Bible

What think ye?.... Of the words just now spoken by him; do not they in your opinion amount to a charge of blasphemy and what punishment do you think ought to be inflicted on him? is he guilty of death, or not? This question he put, as being president of the court:

they answered and said, he is guilty of death; they were unanimous in their vote, for Mark says, "they all condemned him to be guilty of death"; only Joseph of Arimathea must be excepted, who consented not to their counsel and deed, Luke 23:51, and so must Nicodemus, if he was present; who seeing what they were determined to do, withdrew themselves before the question came to be put, and so it passed "nemine contradicente"; and indeed, if he had been guilty of blasphemy, as they charged him, the sentence would have been right. Now this was in the night, in which they begun, carried on, and finished this judicial procedure, quite contrary to one of their own canons w which runs thus:

"pecuniary causes they try in the day, and finish in the night; capital causes (such was this) they try in the day, and finish in the day; pecuniary causes they finish the same day, whether for absolution, or condemnation; capital causes they finish the same day for absolution, and the day following for condemnation; wherefore they do not try causes neither on the sabbath eve, nor on the eve of a feast day.''

But in this case, they begun the trial in the night, examined the witnesses, finished it, and passed the sentence of condemnation, and that in the eve of a grand festival, their Chagigah.

w Misn. Sanhedrin, c. 4. sect. 1. Maimom. Hilch. Sanhedrin, c. 11. sect. 1, 2. T. Hieros. Yom Tob, fol. 63. 1.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible

What think ye? - What is your opinion? What sentence do you pronounce? As President of the Sanhedrin he demanded their judgment.

He is guilty of death - This was the form which was used when a criminal was condemned to die. The meaning is, he is guilty of a crime to which the law annexes death. This sentence was used before the Jews became subject to the Romans, when they had the power of inflicting death. After they were subject to the Romans, though the power of inflicting capital punishment” was taken away, yet they retained the form when they expressed their opinion of the guilt of an offender. The law under which they condemned him was that recorded in Leviticus 24:10-16, which sentenced him that was guilty of blasphemy to death by stoning. The chief priests, however, were unwilling to excite a popular tumult by stoning him, and they therefore consulted to deliver him to the Romans to be crucified, “under the authority of the Roman name,” and thus to prevent any excitement among the people.

Clarke's Notes on the Bible

Verse 66. He is guilty of death. — ενοχος θανατου εστι, he is liable to death. All the forms of justice are here violated. The judge becomes a party and accuser, and proceeds to the verdict without examining whether all the prophecies concerning the Messiah, and the innumerable miracles which he wrought, did not justify him. Examination and proof are the ruin of all calumnies, and of the authors of them, and therefore they take care to keep off from these two things. See Quesnel.


 
adsfree-icon
Ads FreeProfile