Click here to get started today!
Abner is Treacherously Murdered by Joab
3. Chileab] We read nothing more of him and he probably died as a child. In 1 Chronicles 3:1 he is called Daniel. Geshur] a kingdom on the border of Bashan, where Absalom afterwards took refuge (2 Samuel 13:37) It must not be confused with the Geshur of 1 Samuel 27:8.
4. Adonijah] see 1 Kings 1.
7. Rizpah] see 2 Samuel 21:8-11. Gone in unto my father’s concubine] According to Eastern ideas this was equivalent to laying claim to the throne: see 2 Samuel 12:8; 2 Samuel 16:22; 1 Kings 2:22.
8. Am I a dog’s head, which against Judah?] RV ’Am I a dog’s head that belongeth to Judah?’ i.e. a despised enemy. Do shew kindness this day] RV ’This day’ (i.e. at the very time you bring this trivial charge) ’do I shew kindness’: see on 1 Kings 2:17. This woman] LXX ’a woman.’ It was the question of a mere woman.
9. Except.. even so I do to him] RV ’if. I do not even so to him,’ i.e. support David instead of Ish-bosheth.
12. On his behalf] RM ’where he was.’ Whose is the land? saying] LXX omits.
13. Except thou first bring Michal] see 1 Samuel 25:44.
16. Bahurim] in Benjamin, on the road from Jerusalem to the Jordan. It was probably the last town in the dominions of Ish-bosheth.
17. Ye sought for David] It would thus seem that even in northern Israel there was a strong party, who wished to make David king on the death of Saul. It was probably the personal influence of Abner that decided the day in favour of Ish-bosheth. The whole passage clearly shows how weak was the hereditary principle, and how completely the ’king’ was still regarded merely as a military leader and ’judge.’ The element of popular choice is more fully emphasised here than in Judges (except for the Abimelech episode).
19. Benjamin] as being Saul’s fellow-tribesmen they would be specially attached to the royal house and need additional persuasion.
21. Make a league with thee] as they did with Saul (1 Samuel 10:25) and as they tried to do with Rehoboam (1 Kings 12:4). Before making him king, they wished to see their rights safeguarded.
22. From pursuing a troop] RV ’from a foray.’ David had probably arranged a time when Joab was absent.
24. Why is it that thou hast sent him away?] As a kinsman of Asahel, Joab thought that David should have avenged his death.
27. For the blood of Asahel his brother] According to Eastern ideas Joab was bound to avenge his brother’s murder. Neither Judaism, Christianity, nor Mohammedanism has been able to eradicate this feeling. But the Law provided a remedy in the Cities of Refuge (see Numbers 35:11). In the case before us, Joab was probably influenced by the fear that Abner would interfere with his authority: see on
29. On all his father’s house] According to Jewish ideas the family was involved in the fate of the ancestor: cp. 2 Samuel 21:6; 2 Kings 5:27. Leaneth on a staff] rather, ’that holdeth the spindle’: cp. Proverbs 31:19. It was despicable work for a man.
31. Mourn before Abner] i.e. precede the bier. This was all the punishment David was strong enough to inflict.
33. Died Abner as a fool dieth?] i.e. as one who runs into needless danger, or meets his death when engaged in a shameful conspiracy: see on 1 Samuel 25:25.
35. Till the sun be down] The regular time for ending a fast, as it still is in Mohammedan countries. The Hebrew day was reckoned from sunset to sunset.
These files are public domain.
Text Courtesy of BibleSupport.com. Used by Permission.
Dummelow, John. "Commentary on 2 Samuel 3". "John Dummelow's Commentary on the Bible". https://www.studylight.org/
the Week of Proper 19 / Ordinary 24