Click to donate today!
THE REIGN OF JOSIAH (2 Chronicles 34-35).
The history of Josiah, as related here, is in substantial agreement with the narrative of 2 Kings 22, 23 The main difference lies in the fact that the chronicler assigns the various reforms of this king to his eighth, twelfth, and eighteenth years; whereas the compiler of Kings groups them all together, in connection with the repair of the Temple and finding of the Book of the Law, in the eighteenth year of the reign. Our account, moreover, briefly describes the suppression of idolatry, and dwells at great length on the celebration of the Passover; in Kings the contrary is the case.
(1) Josiah was eight years old.—So 2 Kings 22:1, which adds, “and his mother’s name was Jedidah, the daughter of Adaiah of Boscath.”
(1, 2) Length and character of the reign.
(2) And declined . . . the left.—So Kings. Josiah is the only king upon whom this encomium is pronounced. It is equivalent to saying that his observance of the law was perfect. Comp. Deuteronomy 5:32; Deuteronomy 17:20 (the law of the king), 28:14.
In the eighth year.—The specifications of time in this verse are peculiar to the chronicler.
While he was yet young.—Being about sixteen.
He began to seek.—2 Chronicles 17:3-4; 1 Chronicles 13:3.
And in the twelfth year.—When, perhaps, he began to govern alone.
He began to purge.—It is not said that the whole work was completed in the twelfth year; indeed, 2 Chronicles 34:33 implies the contrary. But the writer having begun the story of the destruction of idolatrous objects, naturally continues it to its close, though that properly belongs to Josiah’s eighteenth year (2 Kings 22:3, compared with 2 Kings 23:4 seq.). It is not, therefore, clear (as Thenius asserts) that the chronicler has put the extirpation of idolatry first, simply to show that the pious king needed no special prompting to such a course; or that, as Noldeke supposes, the writer meant to clear this highly-extolled king from the reproach of having quietly put up with the abomination for full eighteen years.
The high places.—2 Kings 23:5; 2 Kings 23:8-9; 2 Kings 23:13.
The groves.—The Asherim (2 Kings 23:4; 2 Kings 6:7; 2 Kings 6:14). There was an Asherah in the Temple, as well as in the high places which Solomon built for Ashtoreth, Chemosh, and Milcom. The carved and molten images are not mentioned in the parallel passage, which, however, gives a much clearer and more original description of the different kinds of idolatry abolished by Josiah. (The Syriac has, “he began to root out the altars, and idols, and leopards, and chapels, and collars, and bells, and all the trees which they made for the idols.”)
(3-7) Idolatry extirpated. This brief account is parallel to 2 Kings 23:4-20.
(4) Of Baalim.—Of the Baals. 2 Kings 23:4-5, “the Baal.”
In his presence.—Comp. 2 Kings 23:16, from which it appears that Josiah personally superintended the work of demolition.
The images.—Sun statues (2 Chronicles 14:4).
That were on high above them, he cut down.—Or, that were above, from off them he hewed.
The molten images.—Rather, the maççebuth, or sacred pillars. (See 2 Kings 23:14.)
Made dust of them.—2 Kings 23:6 (of an Asherah).
And showed . . . unto them.—Literally, and sprinkled upon the face of the graves that used to sacrifice unto them, as if the graves were guilty. 2 Kings 23:6 relates this of the temple Asherah only.
(5) And he burnt . . . upon their altar.—See 2 Kings 23:13-14; 2 Kings 23:16; 2 Kings 23:20 for details. Literally, and bones of priests he burnt. They were bones taken from the graves of the idolatrous priests, who were thus punished, while their altars were irreparably defiled. (For the horror with which such a violation of the dead was then regarded, see Amos 2:1.)
And cleansed (i.e., “purged,” 2 Chronicles 34:3) Judah and Jerusalem.—This phrase does not occur at all in the parallel account.
(6) And so did he in the cities . . . unto Naphtali.—Sec 2 Kings 23:15; 2 Kings 23:19, according to which Josiah destroyed the sanctuary of Bethel, and the high places “in the cities of Samaria,” i.e., the northern kingdom.
Simeon is again mentioned somewhat strangely, as in 2 Chronicles 15:9, no doubt because Beersheba, a famous sanctuary within its territory, was a place of pilgrimage for the northern tribes.
Manasseh and Ephraim, i.e., the northern kingdom, as in 2 Chronicles 31:1; Isaiah 9:21.
With their mattocks.—Rather, in their ruins; reading behorbuthêhem, instead of behorbôthêhem, which means “with their swords.” (Comp. Ezekiel 26:9.) The phrase qualifies the word “cities.” The cities of Israel had been ruined by the Assyrians, Sargon. and Shalmaneser, the latter of whom took Samaria, after a three years’ siege, and carried the people captive to Assyria, in 721 B.C., replacing them by foreign colonists. This explains how it was that Josiah was able to desecrate the northern sanctuaries, and slay their priests (2 Kings 23:20). The ordinary Hebrew text divides the word thus: behar bûtthêhem, so as to suggest the reading behar bûtthêhem, “in the hill of their houses.” The LXX. has “in their places round about”; the Vulg. omits the phrase; and the Syriac reads “in their streets around.” The whole verse should be connected with 2 Chronicles 34:7, thus: “And in the cities of Manasseh and Ephraim and Simeon, even unto Naphtali, to wit, in their ruins round about, he pulled down the altars and the Asherim; and the carven images he dashed into pieces unto pulverising.” Hedaq is an unusual form of the infinitive, not a perfect, as Bertheau supposes.
(7) The idols.—Sun-statues (2 Chronicles 34:4). The word does not occur in the parallel account; but 2 Chronicles 34:5 mentions sun-worship.
(8-13) The cleansing and repair of the Temple. (Comp. 2 Kings 22:3-7; and the similar account of the restoration by Joash in 2 Chronicles 24:11-13).
When he had purged.—Omit had. (Lĕtahçr is apparently co-ordinate with lĕmolkû, “in the eighteenth year to his reigning, to purging the land “; as if the work of purification had been co-extensive with the reign. The LXX., however, has, “in order to purge the land,” which may be right.)
He sent Shaphan.—Who was secretary of state (2 Kings 22:3, “the scribe”).
Maaseiah . . . Joah.—Kings mentions Shaphan only.
The governor of the city.—Sar ha’îr; praefectus urois. (Conp. 1 Chronicles 11:6.)
(9) And when they came . . . they delivered.—And they came . . . and they gave. In 2 Kings 22:3-7, the contents of 2 Chronicles 34:9-12 a are given in the form of the king’s instructions to Shaphan. Here we are told that those instructions were carried out. “They delivered (wayyittĕnû) is substituted for the difficult wĕyattçm of Kings (i.e., “and let him pay out”).
From the hand of Manasseh . . . Benjamin.—Kings, “from the people.” Reuss oddly imagines that these words denote “a kind of organised collection throughout all Palestine,” and then proceeds to draw an inference unfavourable to the chronicler.
And they returned to Jerusalem.—This is the meaning of the Qri or Hebrew margin. The Hebrew text has, “and the inhabitants of Jerusalem,” which is correct.
(10) Put it in.—Gave it into.
The workmen.—The doers of the work, i.e., the overseers or contractors. See Note on 2 Chronicles 24:12.
And they gave it to the workmen . . . the house.—So LXX. and Syriac. The Hebrew text says, and the doers of the work who were working in thehouse of Jehovah gave it for restoring and repairing the house. To whom the masters gave it is stated in next verse.
To repair.—Libdôq, here only. The term is so used in Syriac. The original form of the verse is 2 Kings 22:5, where “the doers of the work” are first the masters, and then the men.
(11) Even to . . . builders.—And they gave it to the craftsmen and to the builders.
For couplings.—For the couplings or girders; an explanation added by the chronicler.
And to floor . . . destroyed.—Kings, “to repair the house.” The reference to the defacement of the Temple buildings by idolatrous kings may be compared with the similar notice concerning Athaliah’s sons, 2 Chronicles 24:7, and Ahaz, 2 Chronicles 28:24. Perhaps, however, the expression “destroyed” does not mean more than “allowed to go to ruin.”
To floor.—To rafter, or joist. (See margin.)
The houses.—The chambers.
(12) And the men did the work faithfully.—Literally, And the men were working (or dealing) in good faith in the work. In 2 Kings 22:7 Josiah bids the High Priest not to require any account of the money delivered to the master-workmen, “because they work in good faith.”
And the overseers of them were.—And over them were set. The names of the overseers, and the details added in next verse, are peculiar to and characteristic of the chronicler.
To set it forward.—To lead, conduct, preside; usually a musical term. (Comp. 1 Chronicles 23:4.)
And other . . . music.—Literally, and the Levites, to wit, every one skilled in the instruments of song. (Comp. 1 Chronicles 15:16; 1 Chronicles 25:7.)
They.—The Levitical musicians-
Were over the bearers of burdens.—They probably cheered their labours with song and music; as was the practice in ancient Egypt.
And were overseers.—Leaders, conductors; see Note on 2 Chronicles 34:12. Notice the honourable position here assigned to the musical guilds of Levites.
And of the Levites . . . porters.—In connection, that is, with the work of restoration. But comp. 1 Chronicles 23:4-5. The writer may only intend to say that there were Levitical guilds of “scribes, officers, and porters,” as well as of musicians.
Scribes.—1 Chronicles 2:55.
(14) And when they brought out.—This verse is not in Kings. It supplements the older account, by assigning the occasion of the discovery.
Josephus makes Hilkiah find the book in the treasure-chamber of the Temple which he had entered to get gold and silver for making some sacred vessels. According to Rabbinical tradition it was found hidden under a heap of stones, where it had been placed to save it from being burnt by king Ahaz.
A book.—The book.
Given by Moses.—The Hebrew phrase, “by the hand of Moses,” belongs not to “the book,” but to “the Law (or teaching) of Jehovah”; and the meaning of the whole expression is, “the Law of Jehovah communicated through the medium or instrumentality of Moses.” (Comp. 2 Chronicles 33:8.)
To Shaphan.—Kings adds, “and he read it.” Those words need not mean that Shaphan read the book through, as Thenius suggests. (See Note on 2 Kings 22:3.)
(14-19) Hilkiah finds the Book of the Law, and delivers it to Shaphan, who reads it before the king. (Comp. 2 Kings 22:8-11.)
(16) Carried.—Brought in.
Committed to thy servants.—Given into the hand of thy servants; viz. the overseers of the repairs.
They do it.—They are doing.
“ And Shaphan brought the book in unto the king” is only a different pointing of, “and Shaphan the scribe came in unto the king,” 2 Kings 22:9. The rest of the verse is an addition of the chronicler’s. Perhaps the Notes on 2 Kings 12:11 and 2chron xxiv, 11 apply hero.
(17) Gathered together.—Poured out from the chest or chests. See 2 Kings 22:9, where “the doers of the work” are identified with “the overseers.”
And to . . . the workmen.—And to . . . the doers of the work.
Perhaps the and is explanatory (even, or that is).
(18) Then.—And. The verse is identical with 2 Kings 22:10, save that it substitutes “read in it” for “read it,” which may mean the same thing. It seems too much to assume that the chronicler altered the phrase, in order to insinuate that the book was of considerable size.
(20-28) The royal message to the prophetess Huldah, and her reply. Comp. 2 Kings 22:12-20.
Abdon the son of Micah.—Kings, “Achbor the son of Micaiah,” which appears right. The Syriac has Abachûr. (See Jeremiah 26:22; Jeremiah 36:12.)
(21) Go, enquire of the Lord.—The verse is virtually identical with 2 Kings 22:13.
For them that are left . . . Judah.—An alteration of, “and for the people and for all Judah” (Kings). The chronicler thinks of the remnant in the northern kingdom.
Poured out.—Kings, “kindled against.” (So LXX.) This was probably the original reading, as the wrath which Josiah dreaded had not yet been poured out upon Judah. But the chronicler remembered the ruin of the ten tribes.
Kept.—Kings, “hearkened to” shamĕ’û, as here, instead of shâmĕrû; and so LXX. and Syriac.
(22) And they that the king had appointed.—The Hebrew text is defective. We may restore it from the LXX., “and they whom the king had commanded”; or better, perhaps, from the Syriac and Vulg., “and all they whom the king sent,” Three MSS. read, “and the king’s princes,” a plausible correction. 2 Kings 22:14 adds the names (2 Chronicles 34:20 supra).
Son of Tikvath.—Heb., Tûkahath. Kings, “Tikvah.” The LXX., Θεκωε, the Syriac, Tekwa, and the Vulg., Thecuath, show that Tikvah or Tikvath is right. (The final h and th of Chronicles arise from blending these two equivalent spellings.)
Son of Hasrah.—Kings, son of Harhas. So the LXX., Apày; but the Syriac (Hasdâ) and Vulg. support Hasrah.
In the college.—In the second quarter y i.e., the lower city.
To that effect.—2 Chronicles 32:15 (“on this manner”). Added by the chronicler. The differences in the text of the oracle which follows are mostly due to alteration of the original, which is more exactly given in Kings.
(24) I will bring.—I am about to bring (participle).
All the curses . . . the book.—An explanatory paraphrase of “all the words of the book” (Kings). (See Deuteronomy 27:15 seq., 28:16 seq., 29:20, 21, 27, 30:19; and comp. Joshua 8:34.)
(25) Works.—“Work” (Kings), and some MSS. and the Syriac version here.
Poured out.—“Shall be kindled” (Kings), which agrees better with “shall not be quenched.” (See 2 Chronicles 34:21 for the same alteration. The LXX. here has (ἐξεκαύθη) “was kindled.”
Burned incense.—Hiphil, which is much commoner in the chronicle than piel, the form in Kings (the forms piel and hiphil of this word qatar are about equally used in Kings.)
(26) To enquire of the Lord.—Strictly, through the Lord. Kings has the accusative.
Against this place.—Kings adds, “that it should become an astonishment and a curse.”
And humbledst thyself before me.—Not in Kings. A characteristic repetition.
And weep.—Shorter form of the verb; a correction of Kings (wattçbk for wattebkeh).
I.—Emphatic. (Kings has the longer form ‘anokî for our ‘anî.)
Saith the Lord.—Is the utterance of Jehovah (ne’ûm Iahweh).
Grave.—Heb., graves. (Comp. 2 Chronicles 16:14.)
And upon the inhabitants of the same.—Added by the chronicler.
(29-33) The king reads the Book to the assembly, and renews the covenant. (Comp. 2 Kings 23:1)
(30) The Levites.—The chronicler substituted this for “the prophets” (Kings). It was a natural change to make, seeing that the prophetic order had long been extinct in his day. It may even be the result of an unconscious error, as the phrase “priests and Levites” is so frequent in his pages.
(31) In his place.—‘Al ‘omdô, “on his stand;” 2 Chronicles 23:13 (Authorised Version, “at his pillar”). Kings has ‘al hâ’ammûd, which appears to be synonymous; “on the dais.”
A covenant.—The covenant.
(32) And he caused . . . stand to it.—Kings, “and all the people stood into (i.e., came into) the covenant.” So Syriac: “And everyone that was found in Jerusalem and in Benjamin rose, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem entered into the covenant of the Lord God of their fathers.” (The chronicler’s reading may be accounted for by the fact that the verbs “he stood and” he caused to stand “differ only in the vowels, which anciently were not written at all. “All that were present in Jerusalem and Benjamin” is an unusual phrase; and it is likely that “and Benjamin” is really a corruption of “into the covenant” which is required by the context here as much as in Kings.)
And the inhabitants . . . fathers—i.e., after they had thus solemnly taken it upon them to do so. The statement is not read in Kings.
(33) And Josiah took away all the abominations.—Of idolatry.
Out of all the countries . . . Israel.—Out of the territories of the Ten Tribes. The statement glances back to 2 Chronicles 34:6, and summarises the account of the abolition of heathenish worships, which follows here in 2 Kings 23:4-20.
And made . . . to serve, even to serve.—And made to serve . . . so as to serve; a unique phrase. The style of the verse is the chronicler’s.
All his days they departed not.—The king’s will secured an outward conformity to the legitimate cultus, and open idolatry was for the time being a peril too serious to be thought of. But the unreality of these reformations by royal mandate is proved by the relapse which immediately followed upon the death of Josiah. The moral corruption which at this epoch was preying upon the vitals of the nation, and hurrying it swiftly to destruction, is revealed in the pathetic pages of the prophet Jeremiah. (See Jeremiah 11:1-23; Jeremiah 13:27; Jeremiah 16:20; Jeremiah 17:1-2, &c.)
These files are public domain.
Text Courtesy of BibleSupport.com. Used by Permission.
Ellicott, Charles John. "Commentary on 2 Chronicles 34". "Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers". https://www.studylight.org/
the Week of Proper 14 / Ordinary 19