corner graphic   Hi,    
Finding the new version too difficult to understand? Go to

Bible Encyclopedias

The 1901 Jewish Encyclopedia


Resource Toolbox
Additional Links

— Biblical Data:

The sin-offering proper is a sacrifice consisting of either a beast or a fowl and offered on the altar to atone for a sin committed unwittingly. The rules concerning the sin-offering are as follows: If the anointed priest or the whole congregation commits a sin through ignorance, the sin-offering is a young bullock without blemish. Should the ruler so sin, his offering is a male kid without blemish. But when a private individual sins, his offering must be either a female kid or a female lamb without blemish, or, if he is too poor to provide one of these, a turtle-dove.

Sin-offerings were brought on other occasions also. On the Day of Atonement the high priest inaugurated the festival with two sin-offerings— a bullock as his own offering, and a male kid for the congregation. The flesh of these was not eaten, but after the fat had been removed the carcasses were burned outside the camp (Leviticus 16:3,5 , 10-11,25, 27). A woman, after the days of her purification had been fulfilled, was required to bring a dove for a sin-offering, in addition to a burnt offering. A leper, on the day of his cleansing, was required to bring, besides other offerings, a female lamb or, if he were too poor, a dove for a sin-offering (Leviticus 12:6 14:10,19 , 22).

Sin-offerings formed a part of inaugural and dedicatory ceremonies. Thus, when Aaron and his sons were inaugurated into the priesthood, one of the sacrifices was a sin-offering consisting of a bullock, the flesh of which was burned outside the camp (Exodus 29: Leviticus 8:14-17 ). Eight days later Aaron brought a calf, and the Israelites brought a small kid, as sin-offerings (Leviticus 9:2-10 ). At the dedication of the altar each of the twelve princes offered a male kid (Numbers 7:16 et passim ). The sacrifices of those who returned from captivity with Ezra included twelve he-goats (Ezra 8:35 ).

In Levitical Ritual.
Somewhat akin to the use of the sin-offering in these cases of consecration is its use in the Levitical ritual in ceremonies of purification, i.e. , in the removal of a taboo. Several of these taboos are connected with sexual matters, or mysterious diseases. Of these may be noted (1) cases of gonorrhea (Leviticus 15:14,15 ), in which the offering was a turtle-dove or a young pigeon (2) cases of menorrhagia (ib. 15:29,30), when also the offering was a turtle-dove or a young pigeon (3) purification after childbirth ( ib. 12:6), the offering being again a turtle-dove or a young pigeon (4) it formed a part of the ritual of a leper who had recovered ( ib. 14:19), the victim in this case being a ewe lamb (comp. ib. 5:10). With these may be classed (5) the use of the sin-offering as part of the ritual by which a Nazarite's vow was discharged ( Numbers 6:14 ), the victim in this case being a ewe lamb a year old. Evidently the sin-offering in the first four of these cases was offered as a recognition of the mysterious or supernatural character of sexual secretions, childbirth, and leprosy. While the vow of the Nazarite is not really in the same class, yet he also became taboo by virtue of his consecration to the Deity, symbolized by the great length of his hair.

Primitive Origin.
The cases thus far considered have their origin in very primitive thought. A more advanced conception may be looked for in cases where the sin-offering is associated with atonement for the nation. In this connection the Day of Atonement comes under consideration ( Leviticus 16 ), on which the high priest offered a bullock as a sin-offering for himself and for his house. This was done apparently that the priest might not be slain while performing public duty it had, therefore, a national significance. Two he-goats were then selected as a sin-offering for the congregation. One of these was selected by lot for Yhwh the remaining one was for Azazel . The priest then killed the bullock, took the blood together with incense, entered into the Holy Place, and sprinkled the blood on the east side of the mercyseat and "before the mercy-seat" seven times, "that he die not." The blood of the goat that was Yhwh 's was brought in and sprinkled in like manner, "to make atonement for the holy place, because of the uncleanness of the children of Israel, and because of their transgressions, even all their sins." The high priest then confessed the sins of the people over the head of the live goat, and it was driven away into the wilderness where Azazel might catch it. Azazel appears to have been a wilderness demon (comp. Ethiopian Book of Enoch, 8:1 10:4,8 et seq. ).

Akin to the sin-offering of the high priest on the Day of Atonement was the offering prescribed in one of the latest laws (Leviticus 4:3-12 ) and which an anointed priest was obliged to offer if he had sinned so as to bring guilt on the congregation. This offering also consisted of a bullock. The same law provided that, if the whole people sinned unwittingly, they should bring, when the sin was known, a young bullock for a sin-offering (ib. 4:13-21). These sin-offerings, like those of the Day of Atonement, were of a national character. That which the same law ( ib. 4:22-26) prescribed for the ruler may have partaken of the same public nature, because of the prominence of the ruler but this is not stated, and the offering may have been a purely personal one. The victim was in this case a he-goat.

Offenses Expiated.
In Leviticus 4 the laws descend finally to the individual. If one of the common people sinned unwittingly (verses 27-32), he was to offer a female goat or a ewe lamb as a sin-offering. The offenses which demanded a sin-offering are detailed in Leviticus 5:1-6 . They are for the most part of a non-moral nature, such as contact with a dead body, with an unclean reptile, or with an unclean discharge from a human being but two of them have more of a moral character. These latter are (1) cases where a man permits injustice by withholding information (ib. verse 1), and (2) cases of rash though ignorant swearing to that which turns out to be false ( ib. verse 4). A noticeable feature of Leviticus 4 and v. is that the expense of the sacrifice is graded according to the dignity or wealth of the offender. Thus in ch. iv. the offering may be a bullock, a he-goat, a she-goat, or a ewe lamb, while in ch. v. it may be a she-goat, a ewe lamb, a turtle-dove, a young pigeon, or the tenth part of an ephah of fine flour (comp. ib. verses 6,7, 11).

It is clear that the sin-offering was not primarily an offering for real sins, but for the unconscious violation of mere taboos. It was demanded in the case of actual sins only sporadically, and then only to a slight degree. There is an exception to this in the ritual of the Day of Atonement but the words in Leviticus 16:16 which make the sin-offering cover real sins are probably of late date.

Bibliography : W. R. Smith, Rel. of Sem. 2d ed., pp. 344-352, London. 1904 Baentsch, Exodus-Leviticus-Numeri , in Nowack's Hand-Kommentar , pp. 373 et seq. , Gö ttingen, 1903.E. G. H. G. A. B.

Copyright Statement
These files are public domain.

Bibliography Information
Singer, Isidore, Ph.D, Projector and Managing Editor. Entry for 'Sin-Offering'. 1901 The Jewish Encyclopedia. 1901.

Lectionary Calendar
Thursday, June 4th, 2020
the Week of Proper 4 / Ordinary 9
Search for…
Enter query in the box:
Choose a letter to browse:
A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M 
N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  Y  Z 

Prev Entry
Next Entry
To report dead links, typos, or html errors or suggestions about making these resources more useful use our convenient contact form
Powered by Lightspeed Technology